Literature DB >> 25168448

Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: searching for cognitive mechanisms.

Iris Blandón-Gitlin1, Elise Fenn2, Jaume Masip3, Aspen H Yoo4.   

Abstract

A current focus in deception research is on developing cognitive-load approaches (CLAs) to detect deception. The aim is to improve lie detection with evidence-based and ecologically valid procedures. Although these approaches show great potential, research on cognitive processes or mechanisms explaining how they operate is lacking. Potential mechanisms underlying the most popular techniques advocated for field application are highlighted. Cognitive scientists are encouraged to conduct basic research that qualifies the 'cognitive' in these new approaches.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25168448      PMCID： PMC4309739          DOI： 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN： 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  8 in total

1.  Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load.

Authors:  Aldert Vrij; Ronald Fisher; Samantha Mann; Sharon Leal
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses.

Authors:  Shawn E Christ; David C Van Essen; Jason M Watson; Lindsay E Brubaker; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Inhibitory spillover: increased urination urgency facilitates impulse control in unrelated domains.

Authors:  Mirjam A Tuk; Debra Trampe; Luk Warlop
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-04-05

4.  Forward and backward recall: different response time patterns, same retrieval order.

Authors:  John G Thomas; Haley R Milner; Karl F Haberlandt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

5.  Reading between the lies: identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions.

Authors:  Stephen Porter; Leanne ten Brinke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-05

6.  Deliberation's blindsight: how cognitive load can improve judgments.

Authors:  Janina A Hoffmann; Bettina von Helversen; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-10

7.  The hippocampus and imagining the future: where do we stand?

Authors:  Donna Rose Addis; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: a review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walczyk; Frank P Igou; Alexa P Dixon; Talar Tcholakian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-01
  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  The effects of the putative confession and evidence presentation on maltreated and non-maltreated 9- to 12-year-olds' disclosures of a minor transgression.

Authors:  Angela D Evans; Thomas D Lyon
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2019-08-30

2.  Spontaneous dishonesty does not specifically engage the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Shanshan Zhen; Rongjun Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.

Authors:  Elise Fenn; Iris Blandón-Gitlin; Jennifer Coons; Catherine Pineda; Reinalyn Echon
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2015-09-11

4.  A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.

Authors:  Elise Fenn; Mollie McGuire; Sara Langben; Iris Blandón-Gitlin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-31

5.  Hiding true emotions: micro-expressions in eyes retrospectively concealed by mouth movements.

Authors:  Miho Iwasaki; Yasuki Noguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.

Authors:  Jaume Masip; Iris Blandón-Gitlin; Carmen Martínez; Carmen Herrero; Izaskun Ibabe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  Lie Detection Using fNIRS Monitoring of Inhibition-Related Brain Regions Discriminates Infrequent but not Frequent Liars.

Authors:  Fang Li; Huilin Zhu; Jie Xu; Qianqian Gao; Huan Guo; Shijing Wu; Xinge Li; Sailing He
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Deception and Cognitive Load: Expanding Our Horizon with a Working Memory Model.

Authors:  Siegfried L Sporer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-07

9.  When deception becomes easy: the effects of task switching and goal neglect on the truth proportion effect.

Authors:  Bram Van Bockstaele; Christine Wilhelm; Ewout Meijer; Evelyne Debey; Bruno Verschuere
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-03

10.  Memory-Based Deception Detection: Extending the Cognitive Signature of Lying From Instructed to Self-Initiated Cheating.

Authors:  Linda M Geven; Gershon Ben-Shakhar; Merel Kindt; Bruno Verschuere
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.