Mikhail N Koffarnus1, Arlington George Wilson2, Warren K Bickel2. 1. Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, VA mickyk@vt.edu. 2. Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, VA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cigarette demand, or the change in cigarette consumption as a function of price, is a measure of reinforcement that is associated with level of tobacco dependence and other clinically relevant measures, but the effects of experimentally controlled income on real-world cigarette consumption have not been examined. METHODS: In this study, income available for cigarette purchases was manipulated to assess the effect on cigarette demand. Tobacco-dependent cigarette smokers (n = 15) who smoked 10-40 cigarettes per day completed a series of cigarette purchasing tasks under a variety of income conditions meant to mimic different weekly cigarette budgets: $280, approximately $127, $70, or approximately $32 per week. Prices of $0.12, $0.25, $0.50, and $1.00 per cigarette were assessed in each income condition. Participants were instructed to purchase as many cigarettes as they would like for the next week and to only consume cigarettes purchased in the context of the study. One price in 1 income condition was randomly chosen to be "real," and the cigarettes and the excess money in the budget for that condition were given to the participant. RESULTS: Results indicate that demand elasticity was negatively correlated with income. Demand intensity (consumption at low prices) was unrelated to income condition and remained high across incomes. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the amount of income that is available for cigarette purchases has a large effect on cigarette consumption, but only at high prices.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Cigarette demand, or the change in cigarette consumption as a function of price, is a measure of reinforcement that is associated with level of tobacco dependence and other clinically relevant measures, but the effects of experimentally controlled income on real-world cigarette consumption have not been examined. METHODS: In this study, income available for cigarette purchases was manipulated to assess the effect on cigarette demand. Tobacco-dependent cigarette smokers (n = 15) who smoked 10-40 cigarettes per day completed a series of cigarette purchasing tasks under a variety of income conditions meant to mimic different weekly cigarette budgets: $280, approximately $127, $70, or approximately $32 per week. Prices of $0.12, $0.25, $0.50, and $1.00 per cigarette were assessed in each income condition. Participants were instructed to purchase as many cigarettes as they would like for the next week and to only consume cigarettes purchased in the context of the study. One price in 1 income condition was randomly chosen to be "real," and the cigarettes and the excess money in the budget for that condition were given to the participant. RESULTS: Results indicate that demand elasticity was negatively correlated with income. Demand intensity (consumption at low prices) was unrelated to income condition and remained high across incomes. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the amount of income that is available for cigarette purchases has a large effect on cigarette consumption, but only at high prices.
Authors: Gregory J Madden; Bethany R Raiff; Carla H Lagorio; Andrea M Begotka; Angela M Mueller; Daniel J Hehli; Ashley A Wegener Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: James MacKillop; James G Murphy; Lara A Ray; Daniel T A Eisenberg; Stephen A Lisman; J Koji Lum; David S Wilson Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Michael T Amlung; John Acker; Monika K Stojek; James G Murphy; James MacKillop Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: James MacKillop; Robert Miranda; Peter M Monti; Lara A Ray; James G Murphy; Damaris J Rohsenow; John E McGeary; Robert M Swift; Jennifer W Tidey; Chad J Gwaltney Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2010-02
Authors: James G Murphy; James MacKillop; Jennifer W Tidey; Linda A Brazil; Suzanne M Colby Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Amanda J Quisenberry; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Leonard H Epstein; Warren K Bickel Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jeffrey S Stein; A George Wilson; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Michael C Judd; Warren K Bickel Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Amanda J Quisenberry; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Laura E Hatz; Leonard H Epstein; Warren K Bickel Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Mikhail N Koffarnus; Christopher T Franck; Jeffrey S Stein; Warren K Bickel Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 3.157