Literature DB >> 26470723

The Experimental Tobacco Marketplace I: Substitutability as a Function of the Price of Conventional Cigarettes.

Amanda J Quisenberry1, Mikhail N Koffarnus1, Laura E Hatz1, Leonard H Epstein2, Warren K Bickel3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Behavioral economic studies of nicotine product consumption have traditionally examined substitution between two products and rarely examined substitution with more products. Increasing numbers of tobacco products available for commercial sale leads to more possible cross-product interactions, indicating a need to examine substitution in more complex arrangements that closely mirror the tobacco marketplace.
METHODS: The experimental tobacco marketplace (ETM) is an experimental online store that displays pictures, information, and prices for several tobacco products. Smokers were endowed with an account balance based on their weekly tobacco purchases. Participants then made potentially real purchases for seven (Experiment 1) or six (Experiment 2) tobacco/nicotine products under four price conditions for conventional cigarettes while prices for other products remained constant. Smokers returned 1 week later to report tobacco/nicotine use and return unused products for a refund.
RESULTS: In Experiment 1 (n = 22), cigarette purchasing decreased as a function of price. Substitution was greatest for electronic cigarettes and cigarillos and significant for electronic cigarettes. Experiment 2 (n = 34) was a replication of Experiment 1, but with cigarillos unavailable in the ETM. In Experiment 2, cigarette purchases decreased as a function of price. Substitution was robust and significant for electronic cigarettes and Camel Snus.
CONCLUSIONS: The ETM is a novel, practical assay that mimics the real-world marketplace, and functions as a simple research tool for both researchers and participants. Across the two experiments the product mix in the ETM altered which products functioned as substitutes suggesting complex interactions between purchasing and product availability. IMPLICATIONS: This article adds a novel method of collecting purchasing data that mimics real world purchasing to the existing literature. The ETM is a practical avenue by which to study both hypothetical and potentially real purchasing.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26470723      PMCID: PMC4902880          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  18 in total

1.  Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients.

Authors:  E A Jacobs; W K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 2.  Macro-social influences: the effects of prices and tobacco-control policies on the demand for tobacco products.

Authors:  F J Chaloupka
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  Experimental research on the relation between food price changes and food-purchasing patterns: a targeted review.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Noelle Jankowiak; Chantal Nederkoorn; Hollie A Raynor; Simone A French; Eric Finkelstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. IV. The effects of response requirement on the consumption of and interaction between concurrently available coffee and cigarettes.

Authors:  W K Bickel; J R Hughes; R J DeGrandpre; S T Higgins; P Rizzuto
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers.

Authors:  James G Murphy; James MacKillop
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Further validation of a cigarette purchase task for assessing the relative reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in college smokers.

Authors:  James MacKillop; James G Murphy; Lara A Ray; Daniel T A Eisenberg; Stephen A Lisman; J Koji Lum; David S Wilson
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Nicotine gum as a substitute for cigarettes: a behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  T A Shahan; A L Odum; W K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.293

8.  Behavioral Economics of Cigarette Purchase Tasks: Within-Subject Comparison of Real, Potentially Real, and Hypothetical Cigarettes.

Authors:  A George Wilson; Christopher T Franck; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Behavioral economics and empirical public policy.

Authors:  Steven R Hursh; Peter G Roma
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  The behavioral economics of substance use disorders: reinforcement pathologies and their repair.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Matthew W Johnson; Mikhail N Koffarnus; James MacKillop; James G Murphy
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 18.561

View more
  24 in total

1.  The experimental tobacco marketplace: Narrative influence on electronic cigarette substitution.

Authors:  W Brady DeHart; Brent A Kaplan; Derek A Pope; Alexandra M Mellis; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Behavioral economic substitutability of e-cigarettes, tobacco cigarettes, and nicotine gum.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Patrick S Johnson; Olga Rass; Lauren R Pacek
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.153

3.  The Experimental Tobacco Marketplace II: Substitutability and sex effects in dual electronic cigarette and conventional cigarette users.

Authors:  Amanda J Quisenberry; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Leonard H Epstein; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 4.  A framework for evaluating the public health impact of e-cigarettes and other vaporized nicotine products.

Authors:  David T Levy; K Michael Cummings; Andrea C Villanti; Ray Niaura; David B Abrams; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Naturalistic assessment of demand for cigarettes, snus, and nicotine gum.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stein; A George Wilson; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Michael C Judd; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Substitutability of nicotine alone and an electronic cigarette liquid using a concurrent choice assay in rats: A behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  John R Smethells; Andrew C Harris; Danielle Burroughs; Steven R Hursh; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  The Experimental Tobacco Marketplace: Narratives engage cognitive biases to increase electronic cigarette substitution.

Authors:  William Brady DeHart; Alexandra M Mellis; Brent A Kaplan; Derek A Pope; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Technology-based contingency management and e-cigarettes during the initial weeks of a smoking quit attempt.

Authors:  Sarah G Martner; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2019-10-02

9.  Development and Piloting Testing of an Experimental Tobacco and Nicotine Product Marketplace.

Authors:  Dana Mowls Carroll; Lori Strayer; Natalie Nardone; Lauren R Pacek; Rachel V Kozink; Katelyn Tessier; Joseph McClernon; Neal Benowitz; Warren K Bickel; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 10.  Clinical models of decision making in addiction.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.