Literature DB >> 25165456

Marching into battle: synchronized walking diminishes the conceptualized formidability of an antagonist in men.

Daniel M T Fessler1, Colin Holbrook2.   

Abstract

Paralleling behaviours in other species, synchronized movement is central to institutionalized collective human activities thought to enhance cooperation, and experiments demonstrate that synchrony has this effect. The influence of synchrony on cooperation may derive from an evolutionary history wherein such actions served to signal coalitional strength to both participants and observers-including adversaries. If so, then synchronous movement should diminish individuals' estimations of a foe's formidability. Envisioned physical size and strength constitute the dimensions of a representation that summarizes relative fighting capacity. Experiencing synchrony should therefore lead individuals to conceptualize an antagonist as smaller and weaker. We found that men who walked synchronously with a male confederate indeed envisioned a purported criminal as less physically formidable than did men who engaged in this task without synchronizing.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alliance; fighting capacity; synchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25165456      PMCID: PMC4155918          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  16 in total

Review 1.  Is music an evolutionary adaptation?

Authors:  D Huron
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Living large: the powerful overestimate their own height.

Authors:  Michelle M Duguid; Jack A Goncalo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14

Review 3.  The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-01-17

4.  The role of synchronized swimming as affiliative and anti-predatory behavior in long-finned pilot whales.

Authors:  Valeria Senigaglia; Renaud de Stephanis; Phillippe Verborgh; David Lusseau
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Physio-behavioral coupling in a cooperative team task: contributors and relations.

Authors:  Adam J Strang; Gregory J Funke; Sheldon M Russell; Allen W Dukes; Matthew S Middendorf
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Friends shrink foes: the presence of comrades decreases the envisioned physical formidability of an opponent.

Authors:  Daniel M T Fessler; Colin Holbrook
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-28

7.  How do rituals affect cooperation? An experimental field study comparing nine ritual types.

Authors:  Ronald Fischer; Rohan Callander; Paul Reddish; Joseph Bulbulia
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-06

8.  Men's physical strength moderates conceptualizations of prospective foes in two disparate societies.

Authors:  Daniel M T Fessler; Colin Holbrook; Matthew M Gervais
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-09

9.  Dressed to kill? Visible markers of coalitional affiliation enhance conceptualized formidability.

Authors:  Daniel M T Fessler; Colin Holbrook; David Dashoff
Journal:  Aggress Behav       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.917

10.  Let's dance together: synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation.

Authors:  Paul Reddish; Ronald Fischer; Joseph Bulbulia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Cohesion and Joint Speech: Right Hemisphere Contributions to Synchronized Vocal Production.

Authors:  Kyle M Jasmin; Carolyn McGettigan; Zarinah K Agnew; Nadine Lavan; Oliver Josephs; Fred Cummins; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Acoustic coordination by allied male dolphins in a cooperative context.

Authors:  Bronte L Moore; Richard C Connor; Simon J Allen; Michael Krützen; Stephanie L King
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Effects of sounds of locomotion on speech perception.

Authors:  Matz Larsson; Seth Reino Ekström; Parivash Ranjbar
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

Review 4.  Prosocial Consequences of Interpersonal Synchrony: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Miriam Rennung; Anja S Göritz
Journal:  Z Psychol       Date:  2016-10-28

5.  Common marmosets show social plasticity and group-level similarity in personality.

Authors:  Sonja E Koski; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Synchrony and Physiological Arousal Increase Cohesion and Cooperation in Large Naturalistic Groups.

Authors:  Joshua Conrad Jackson; Jonathan Jong; David Bilkey; Harvey Whitehouse; Stefanie Zollmann; Craig McNaughton; Jamin Halberstadt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Brain-to-brain synchronization across two persons predicts mutual prosociality.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Yinying Hu; Xianchun Li; Yafeng Pan; Xiaojun Cheng
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Joint action aesthetics.

Authors:  Staci Vicary; Matthias Sperling; Jorina von Zimmermann; Daniel C Richardson; Guido Orgs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Silent disco: dancing in synchrony leads to elevated pain thresholds and social closeness.

Authors:  Bronwyn Tarr; Jacques Launay; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.178

10.  Self-other overlap and interpersonal neural synchronization serially mediate the effect of behavioral synchronization on prosociality.

Authors:  Xiaodan Feng; Binghai Sun; Chuansheng Chen; Weijian Li; Ying Wang; Wenhai Zhang; Weilong Xiao; Yuting Shao
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.