Literature DB >> 25164794

ACR Appropriateness Criteria head trauma--child.

Maura E Ryan1, Susan Palasis2, Gaurav Saigal3, Adam D Singer4, Boaz Karmazyn5, Molly E Dempsey6, Jonathan R Dillman7, Christopher E Dory8, Matthew Garber9, Laura L Hayes10, Ramesh S Iyer11, Catherine A Mazzola12, Molly E Raske13, Henry E Rice14, Cynthia K Rigsby15, Paul R Sierzenski16, Peter J Strouse7, Sjirk J Westra17, Sandra L Wootton-Gorges18, Brian D Coley19.   

Abstract

Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. CT is considered the first line of study for suspected intracranial injury because of its wide availability and rapid detection of acute hemorrhage. However, the majority of childhood head injuries occur without neurologic complications, and particular consideration should be given to the greater risks of ionizing radiation in young patients in the decision to use CT for those with mild head trauma. MRI can detect traumatic complications without radiation, but often requires sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment and exposes the patient to potential anesthesia risks. MRI may be helpful in patients with suspected nonaccidental trauma, with which axonal shear injury and ischemia are more common and documentation is critical, as well as in those whose clinical status is discordant with CT findings. Advanced techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging, may identify changes occult by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appropriateness criteria; CT; MRI; head trauma; nonaccidental injury; pediatric

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25164794     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of non-sedated brain MRI and CT for the detection of acute traumatic injury in children 6 years of age or less.

Authors:  Joseph Yeen Young; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Paul Albert Caruso; Sandra Patricia Rincon
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-05-11

2.  The Think A-Head campaign: an introduction to ImageGently 2.0.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Lee S Benjamin; Nadia Kadom; Charles G Macias; Sally K Snow; Sarah J Gaskill; Emilee Palmer; Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04

3.  Comparison of Iterative Model Reconstruction versus Filtered Back-Projection in Pediatric Emergency Head CT: Dose, Image Quality, and Image-Reconstruction Times.

Authors:  R N Southard; D M E Bardo; M H Temkit; M A Thorkelson; R A Augustyn; C A Martinot
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Use of magnetic resonance imaging in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: assessment of current practice.

Authors:  Peter A Ferrazzano; Bedda L Rosario; Stephen R Wisniewski; Nadeem I Shafi; Heather M Siefkes; Darryl K Miles; Andrew L Alexander; Michael J Bell
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Comparison of Machine Learning Optimal Classification Trees With the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Head Trauma Decision Rules.

Authors:  Dimitris Bertsimas; Jack Dunn; Dale W Steele; Thomas A Trikalinos; Yuchen Wang
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 6.  Neuroimaging Wisely.

Authors:  J Buethe; J Nazarian; K Kalisz; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hannah M Lindsey; Cooper B Hodges; Kaitlyn M Greer; Elisabeth A Wilde; Tricia L Merkley
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  A systematic review and quality analysis of pediatric traumatic brain injury clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Roselyn Appenteng; Taylor Nelp; Jihad Abdelgadir; Nelly Weledji; Michael Haglund; Emily Smith; Oscar Obiga; Francis M Sakita; Edson A Miguel; Carolina M Vissoci; Henry Rice; Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci; Catherine Staton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.