Peter A Ferrazzano1, Bedda L Rosario2, Stephen R Wisniewski2, Nadeem I Shafi3, Heather M Siefkes4, Darryl K Miles5, Andrew L Alexander6,7, Michael J Bell8. 1. Departments of1Pediatrics. 2. 4Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. 5Pediatrics, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee. 4. 6Pediatrics, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California. 5. 7Pediatrics, University of Texas-Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; and. 6. 2Medical Physics, and. 7. 3Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. 8. 8Pediatrics, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on the optimal timing and specific brain MRI sequences in the evaluation and management of severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI), and information on current practices is lacking. The authors performed a survey of MRI practices among sites participating in a multicenter study of severe pediatric TBI to provide information for designing future clinical trials using MRI to assess brain injury after severe pediatric TBI. METHODS: Information on current imaging practices and resources was collected from 27 institutions participating in the Approaches and Decisions after Pediatric TBI Trial. Multiple-choice questions addressed the percentage of patients with TBI who have MRI studies, timing of MRI, MRI sequences used to investigate TBI, as well as the magnetic field strength of MR scanners used at the participating institutions and use of standardized MRI protocols for imaging after severe pediatric TBI. RESULTS: Overall, the reported use of MRI in pediatric patients with severe TBI at participating sites was high, with 40% of sites indicating that they obtain MRI studies in > 95% of this patient population. Differences were observed in the frequency of MRI use between US and international sites, with the US sites obtaining MRI in a higher proportion of their pediatric patients with severe TBI (94% of US vs 44% of international sites reported MRI in at least 70% of patients with severe TBI). The reported timing and composition of MRI studies was highly variable across sites. Sixty percent of sites reported typically obtaining an MRI study within the first 7 days postinjury, with the remainder of responses distributed throughout the first 30-day postinjury period. Responses indicated that MRI sequences sensitive for diffuse axonal injury and ischemia are frequently obtained in patients with TBI, whereas perfusion imaging and spectroscopy techniques are less common. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this survey suggest that despite the lack of consensus or guidelines, MRI is commonly obtained during the acute clinical setting after severe pediatric TBI. The variation in MRI practices highlights the need for additional studies to determine the utility, optimal timing, and composition of clinical MRI studies after TBI. The information in this survey describes current clinical MRI practices in children with severe TBI and identifies important challenges and objectives that should be considered when designing future studies.
OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on the optimal timing and specific brain MRI sequences in the evaluation and management of severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI), and information on current practices is lacking. The authors performed a survey of MRI practices among sites participating in a multicenter study of severe pediatric TBI to provide information for designing future clinical trials using MRI to assess brain injury after severe pediatric TBI. METHODS: Information on current imaging practices and resources was collected from 27 institutions participating in the Approaches and Decisions after Pediatric TBI Trial. Multiple-choice questions addressed the percentage of patients with TBI who have MRI studies, timing of MRI, MRI sequences used to investigate TBI, as well as the magnetic field strength of MR scanners used at the participating institutions and use of standardized MRI protocols for imaging after severe pediatric TBI. RESULTS: Overall, the reported use of MRI in pediatric patients with severe TBI at participating sites was high, with 40% of sites indicating that they obtain MRI studies in > 95% of this patient population. Differences were observed in the frequency of MRI use between US and international sites, with the US sites obtaining MRI in a higher proportion of their pediatric patients with severe TBI (94% of US vs 44% of international sites reported MRI in at least 70% of patients with severe TBI). The reported timing and composition of MRI studies was highly variable across sites. Sixty percent of sites reported typically obtaining an MRI study within the first 7 days postinjury, with the remainder of responses distributed throughout the first 30-day postinjury period. Responses indicated that MRI sequences sensitive for diffuse axonal injury and ischemia are frequently obtained in patients with TBI, whereas perfusion imaging and spectroscopy techniques are less common. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this survey suggest that despite the lack of consensus or guidelines, MRI is commonly obtained during the acute clinical setting after severe pediatric TBI. The variation in MRI practices highlights the need for additional studies to determine the utility, optimal timing, and composition of clinical MRI studies after TBI. The information in this survey describes current clinical MRI practices in children with severe TBI and identifies important challenges and objectives that should be considered when designing future studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
ACR = American College of Radiology; ADAPT = Approaches and Decisions after Pediatric TBI; DAI = diffuse axonal injury; DTI = diffusion tensor imaging; DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; GOS-E Peds = Pediatric Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended; GRE = gradient recalled echo; ICP = intracranial pressure; MRS = MR spectroscopy; PICU = pediatric intensive care unit; PWI = perfusion-weighted imaging; SWI = susceptibility-weighted imaging; TBI = traumatic brain injury; magnetic resonance imaging; pediatric traumatic brain injury; survey; trauma
Authors: Talin Babikian; M Catherin Freier; Karen A Tong; Joshua P Nickerson; Christopher J Wall; Barbara A Holshouser; Todd Burley; Matt L Riggs; Stephen Ashwal Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Bram Jacobs; Tjemme Beems; Ton M van der Vliet; Arie B van Vugt; Cornelia Hoedemaekers; Janneke Horn; Gaby Franschman; Ian Haitsma; Joukje van der Naalt; Teuntje M J C Andriessen; George F Borm; Pieter E Vos Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Patrick M Kochanek; Nancy Carney; P David Adelson; Stephen Ashwal; Michael J Bell; Susan Bratton; Susan Carson; Randall M Chesnut; Jamshid Ghajar; Brahm Goldstein; Gerald A Grant; Niranjan Kissoon; Kimberly Peterson; Nathan R Selden; Robert C Tasker; Karen A Tong; Monica S Vavilala; Mark S Wainwright; Craig R Warden Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Carlos Marquez de la Plata; Andreea Ardelean; Della Koovakkattu; Priya Srinivasan; Anna Miller; Viet Phuong; Caryn Harper; Carol Moore; Anthony Whittemore; Christopher Madden; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Michael Devous Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Gemma Claret Teruel; Antonio Palomeque Rico; Francisco José Cambra Lasaosa; Albert Català Temprano; Antoni Noguera Julian; Josep Maria Costa Clarà Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: William J Powers; Colin P Derdeyn; José Biller; Christopher S Coffey; Brian L Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; S Claiborne Johnston; Alexander A Khalessi; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dileep R Yavagal Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 10.170
Authors: Anna M Janas; FeiFei Qin; Scott Hamilton; Bin Jiang; Nicole Baier; Max Wintermark; Zachary Threlkeld; Sarah Lee Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 3.532
Authors: Peter Ferrazzano; Benjamin Yeske; Jeanette Mumford; Gregory Kirk; Erin D Bigler; Katherine Bowen; Nicole O'Brien; Bedda Rosario; Sue R Beers; Paul Rathouz; Michael J Bell; Andrew L Alexander Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 4.869
Authors: Nikki Miller Ferguson; Susan Rebsamen; Aaron S Field; Jose M Guerrero; Bedda L Rosario; Aimee T Broman; Paul J Rathouz; Michael J Bell; Andrew L Alexander; Peter A Ferrazzano Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-07-21
Authors: Jose M Guerrero-Gonzalez; Benjamin Yeske; Gregory R Kirk; Michael J Bell; Peter A Ferrazzano; Andrew L Alexander Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 7.400