Literature DB >> 25164022

Embryo vitrification using a novel semi-automated closed system yields in vitro outcomes equivalent to the manual Cryotop method.

Tammie K Roy1, Susanna Brandi2, Naomi M Tappe2, Cara K Bradley2, Eduardo Vom3, Chester Henderson3, Craig Lewis3, Kristy Battista3, Ben Hobbs3, Simon Hobbs3, John Syer3, Sam R Lanyon2, Sacha M Dopheide3, Teija T Peura2, Steven J McArthur4, Mark C Bowman4, Tomas Stojanov4.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Can the equilibration steps prior to embryo vitrification be automated? SUMMARY ANSWER: We have developed the 'Gavi' system which automatically performs equilibration steps before closed system vitrification on up to four embryos at a time and gives in vitro outcomes equivalent to the manual Cryotop method. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Embryo cryopreservation is an essential component of a successful assisted reproduction clinic, with vitrification providing excellent embryo survival and pregnancy outcomes. However, vitrification is a manual, labour-intensive and highly skilled procedure, and results can vary between embryologists and clinics. A closed system whereby the embryo does not come in direct contact with liquid nitrogen is preferred by many clinics and is a regulatory requirement in some countries. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The Gavi system, an automation instrument with a novel closed system device, was used to equilibrate embryos prior to vitrification. Outcomes for embryos automatically processed with the Gavi system were compared with those processed with the manual Cryotop method and with fresh (non-vitrified) controls. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: The efficacy of the Gavi system (Alpha model) was assessed for mouse (Quackenbush Swiss and F1 C57BL/6J x CBA) zygotes, cleavage stage embryos and blastocysts, and for donated human vitrified-warmed blastocysts. The main outcomes assessed included recovery, survival and in vitro embryo development after vitrification-warming. Cooling and warming rates were measured using a thermocouple probe. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Mouse embryos vitrified after processing with the automated Gavi system achieved equivalent in vitro outcomes to that of Cryotop controls. For example, for mouse blastocysts both the Gavi system (n = 176) and manual Cryotop method (n = 172) gave a 99% recovery rate, of which 54 and 50%, respectively, progressed to fully hatched blastocysts 48 h after warming. The outcomes for human blastocysts processed with the Gavi system (n = 23) were also equivalent to Cryotop controls (n = 13) including 100% recovery for both groups, of which 17 and 15%, respectively, progressed to fully hatched blastocysts 48 h after warming. The cooling and warming rates achieved with the Gavi system were 14 136°C/min and 11 239°C/min, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Testing of the Gavi system described here was limited to in vitro development of embryos from two mouse strains and a limited number of human embryos. Validation of Gavi system advanced production models is now required to confirm the success of semi-automated vitrification, including clinical evaluation of pregnancy outcomes from the transfer of Gavi vitrified-warmed human embryos. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The Gavi system has the potential to revolutionize and standardize vitrification of embryos and oocytes. The success of the Gavi system shows that it is possible to semi-automate complicated labour-intensive ART methods and processes, and opens up the possibility for further improvements in clinical outcomes and efficiencies in the ART clinic. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by Genea Ltd. S.B., N.M.T., T.T.P., S.J.M., M.C.B. and T.S. are shareholders of Genea Ltd. E.V., C.H., C.L., S.R.L. and S.M.D. are shareholders of Planet Innovation Pty Ltd. The remaining authors are employees of either Genea Ltd. or Planet Innovation Pty Ltd.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; automation; embryo; standardization; vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25164022     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  14 in total

Review 1.  Application of microfluidic technologies to human assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Gary D Smith; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  A new, simple, automatic vitrification device: preliminary results with murine and bovine oocytes and embryos.

Authors:  Amir Arav; Yehudit Natan; Dorit Kalo; Alisa Komsky-Elbaz; Zvika Roth; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Milton Leong; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Semi-automated versus manual embryo vitrification: inter-operator variability, time-saving, and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Nicolas Gatimel; Jessika Moreau; Célia Bettiol; Jean Parinaud; Roger D Léandri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Comparison of open and a novel closed vitrification system with slow freezing for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation.

Authors:  Yodo Sugishita; Enes Taylan; Tai Kawahara; Bunyad Shahmurzada; Nao Suzuki; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.357

5.  Fertility Preservation Options for Men and Women With Cancer.

Authors:  Malgorzata E Skaznik-Wikiel; Sara Babcock Gilbert; Randall B Meacham; Laxmi A Kondapalli
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

6.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Fine morphological assessment of quality of human mature oocytes after slow freezing or vitrification with a closed device: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Veronica Bianchi; Guido Macchiarelli; Andrea Borini; Michela Lappi; Sandra Cecconi; Selenia Miglietta; Giuseppe Familiari; Stefania A Nottola
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 8.  Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Clarisa Gracia; Roberta Maggiulli; Andrew R LaBarbera; Daniel J Kaser; Filippo M Ubaldi; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Development of Cheaper Embryo Vitrification Device Using the Minimum Volume Method.

Authors:  Francisco Marco-Jiménez; Estrella Jiménez-Trigos; Victoria Almela-Miralles; José Salvador Vicente
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Rapid freezing versus Cryotop vitrification of mouse two-cell embryos.

Authors:  Namfon Inna; Usanee Sanmee; Ubol Saeng-Anan; Waraporn Piromlertamorn; Teraporn Vutyavanich
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2018-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.