Literature DB >> 25163901

Revisiting renovascular imaging for renal sympathetic denervation: current techniques and applications.

Uei Pua1, Cher Heng Tan, Hee Hwa Ho, Julian Ko Beng Tan, Paul Jau Leong Ong.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is an emerging technique in the treatment of resistant hypertension, most commonly performed using an endovascular approach. Clinical and anatomical criteria for RDN are well established and imaging plays an integral role in selecting patients with suitable anatomy, procedural planning and device selection. Nevertheless, the current body of literature surrounding imaging related to RDN remains limited. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the expectations and limitations of various imaging techniques, including Doppler ultrasound, CT angiography, MR angiography and newer techniques such as non-contrast MR angiography, in the context of RDN. KEY POINTS: • To understand the role of imaging in renal denervation • To understand strengths and weaknesses of current imaging techniques • To understand the relevant imaging findings in the context of renal denervation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25163901     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3392-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  38 in total

Review 1.  Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group IV: imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Olin; John A Kaufman; David A Bluemke; Robert O Bonow; Marie D Gerhard; Michael R Jaff; Geoffrey D Rubin; Winthrop Hall
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: established techniques.

Authors:  Mitsue Miyazaki; Masaaki Akahane
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  James F Glockner; Naoki Takahashi; Akira Kawashima; David A Woodrum; David W Stanley; Naoyuki Takei; Mitsuharu Miyoshi; Wei Sun
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Potential new indications and future studies.

Authors:  Isabella Sudano; Georg Noll; Thomas F Luscher
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.534

Review 5.  Imaging for renovascular disease.

Authors:  W Charles O'Neill; Moreno Bardelli; Alexander S Yevzlin
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.299

6.  Renal artery stenosis after renal sympathetic denervation.

Authors:  Benjamin Kaltenbach; Dani Id; Jennifer C Franke; Horst Sievert; Marcus Hennersdorf; Jens Maier; Stefan C Bertog
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  A prospective comparison of duplex ultrasonography, captopril renography, MRA, and CTA in assessing renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  H Eklöf; H Ahlström; A Magnusson; L-G Andersson; B Andrén; A Hägg; D Bergqvist; R Nyman
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Percutaneous renal denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: final 3-year report of the Symplicity HTN-1 study.

Authors:  Henry Krum; Markus P Schlaich; Paul A Sobotka; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud; Krishna Rocha-Singh; Richard Katholi; Murray D Esler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Safety aspects of gadofosveset in clinical practice--analysis of acute and long-term complications.

Authors:  Alaa Alhadad; Michael Akesson; Leena Lehti; Peter Leander; Gunnar Sterner; Per Akeson; Johan Wassélius
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Sympatho-renal axis in chronic disease.

Authors:  Paul A Sobotka; Felix Mahfoud; Markus P Schlaich; Uta C Hoppe; Michael Böhm; Henry Krum
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 5.460

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.372

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.