Literature DB >> 25163672

Recovery of precision grasping after motor cortex lesion does not require forced use of the impaired hand in Macaca mulatta.

Warren G Darling1, Robert J Morecraft, Diane L Rotella, Marc A Pizzimenti, Jizhi Ge, Kimberly S Stilwell-Morecraft, Hongyu Zhang, Hesham Soliman, Dave Seecharan, Ian Edwards, David McNeal, Randolph J Nudo, Paul Cheney.   

Abstract

We investigated recovery of precision grasping of small objects between the index finger and thumb of the impaired hand without forced use after surgically placed lesions to the hand/arm areas of M1 and M1 + lateral premotor cortex in two monkeys. The unilateral lesions were contralateral to the monkey's preferred hand, which was established in prelesion testing as the hand used most often to acquire raisins in a foraging board (FB) task in which the monkey was free to use either hand to acquire treats. The lesions initially produced a clear paresis of the contralesional hand and use of only the ipsilesional hand to acquire raisins in the FB task. However, beginning about 3 weeks after the lesion both monkeys spontaneously began using the impaired contralesional hand in the FB task and increased use of that hand over the next few tests. Moreover, the monkeys clearly used precision grasp to acquire the raisins in a similar manner to prelesion performances, although grasp durations were longer. Although the monkeys used the contralesional hand more often than the ipsilesional hand in some postlesion testing sessions, they did not recover to use the hand as often as in prelesion testing when the preferred hand was used almost exclusively. These findings suggest that recovery of fine hand/digit motor function after localized damage to the lateral frontal motor areas in rhesus monkeys does not require forced use of the impaired hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25163672      PMCID: PMC4241169          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4068-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Reduced-intensity modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus conventional therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke: a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Nicola Smania; Marialuisa Gandolfi; Stefano Paolucci; Marco Iosa; Patrizia Ianes; Serena Recchia; Chiara Giovanzana; Franco Molteni; Renato Avesani; Pietro Di Paolo; Massimo Zaccala; Michela Agostini; Cristina Tassorelli; Antonio Fiaschi; Daniela Primon; Maria Grazia Ceravolo; Simona Farina
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Reorganization of remote cortical regions after ischemic brain injury: a potential substrate for stroke recovery.

Authors:  S B Frost; S Barbay; K M Friel; E J Plautz; R J Nudo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Dexterous finger movements in primate without monosynaptic corticomotoneuronal excitation.

Authors:  Shigeto Sasaki; Tadashi Isa; Lars-Gunnar Pettersson; Bror Alstermark; Kimisato Naito; Kazuya Yoshimura; Kazuhiko Seki; Yukari Ohki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Subdivisions of primary motor cortex based on cortico-motoneuronal cells.

Authors:  Jean-Alban Rathelot; Peter L Strick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct.

Authors:  R J Nudo; B M Wise; F SiFuentes; G W Milliken
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Volumetric effects of motor cortex injury on recovery of ipsilesional dexterous movements.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Marc A Pizzimenti; Stephanie M Hynes; Diane L Rotella; Grant Headley; Jizhi Ge; Kimberly S Stilwell-Morecraft; David W McNeal; Kathryn M Solon-Cline; Robert J Morecraft
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 7.  The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  E Taub; G Uswatte; V W Mark; D M M Morris
Journal:  Eura Medicophys       Date:  2006-09

8.  Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R J Nudo; G W Milliken
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Minimal forced use without constraint stimulates spontaneous use of the impaired upper extremity following motor cortex injury.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Marc A Pizzimenti; Diane L Rotella; Stephanie M Hynes; Jizhi Ge; Kimberly S Stilwell-Morecraft; Tyler Vanadurongvan; David W McNeal; Kathryn M Solon-Cline; Robert J Morecraft
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dissociation of the Reach and the Grasp in the destriate (V1) monkey Helen: a new anatomy for the dual visuomotor channel theory of reaching.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Jenni M Karl; Nicholas K Humphrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Greater Reduction in Contralesional Hand Use After Frontoparietal Than Frontal Motor Cortex Lesions in Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Marc A Pizzimenti; Diane L Rotella; Jizhi Ge; Kimberly S Stilwell-Morecraft; Robert J Morecraft
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.