Literature DB >> 25163629

The locus of the Gratton effect in picture-word interference.

Leendert van Maanen1, Hedderik van Rijn.   

Abstract

Between-trial effects in Stroop-like interference tasks are linked to differences in the amount of cognitive control. Trials following an incongruent trial show less interference, an effect suggested to result from the increased control caused by the incongruent previous trial (known as the Gratton effect). In this study, we show that cognitive control not only results in a different amount of interference but also in a different locus of the interference. That is, the stage of the task that shows the most interference changes as a function of the preceding trial. Using computational cognitive modeling, we explain these effects by a difference in the amount of processing of the irrelevant dimension of the stimulus.
Copyright © 2009 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Keywords:  ACT-R; Accumulator models; Gratton effect; Picture-word interference; Psychological refractory period (PRP); RACE/A

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 25163629     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01069.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  11 in total

1.  Semantic picture-word interference is a postperceptual effect.

Authors:  Tatiana T Schnur; Randi Martin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Approaches to Analysis in Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Birte U Forstmann; Bradley C Love; Thomas J Palmeri; Leendert Van Maanen
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Task difficulty modulates brain-behavior correlations in language production and cognitive control: Behavioral and fMRI evidence from a phonological go/no-go picture-naming paradigm.

Authors:  Haoyun Zhang; Anna Eppes; Anne Beatty-Martínez; Christian Navarro-Torres; Michele T Diaz
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Scott D Brown; Tom Eichele; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Tiffany Ho; John Serences; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Modeling fan effects on the time course of associative recognition.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Cognitive control in processing ambiguous idioms: evidence from a self-paced reading study.

Authors:  Tamar Arnon; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2022-03-22

8.  Piéron's Law and Optimal Behavior in Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Raoul P P P Grasman; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Pupil dilation co-varies with memory strength of individual traces in a delayed response paired-associate task.

Authors:  Hedderik van Rijn; Jelle R Dalenberg; Jelmer P Borst; Simone A Sprenger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How to assess the existence of competing strategies in cognitive tasks: a primer on the fixed-point property.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Ritske de Jong; Hedderik van Rijn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.