RATIONALE: Although striatal dopamine (DA) is important in alcohol abuse, the nature of DA release during actual alcohol drinking is unclear, since drinking includes self-administration of both conditioned flavor stimuli (CS) of the alcoholic beverage and subsequent intoxication, the unconditioned stimulus (US). OBJECTIVES: Here, we used a novel self-administration analog to distinguish nucleus accumbens (NAcc) DA responses specific to the CS and US. METHODS: Right-handed male heavy drinkers (n = 26) received three positron emission tomography (PET) scans with the D2/D3 radioligand [(11)C]raclopride (RAC) and performed a pseudo self-administration task that separately administered a flavor CS of either a habitually consumed beer or the appetitive control Gatorade®, concomitant with the US of ethanol intoxication (0.06 g/dL intravenous (IV) administration) or IV saline. Scan conditions were Gatorade flavor + saline (Gat&Sal), Gatorade flavor + ethanol (Gat&Eth), and beer flavor + ethanol (Beer&Eth). RESULTS: Ethanol (US) reduced RAC binding (inferring DA release) in the left (L) NAcc [Gat&Sal > Gat&Eth]. Beer flavor (CS) increased DA in the right (R) NAcc [Gat&Eth > Beer&Eth]. The combination of beer flavor and ethanol (CS + US), [Gat&Sal > Beer&Eth], induced DA release in bilateral NAcc. Self-reported intoxication during scanning correlated with L NAcc DA release. Relative to saline, infusion of ethanol increased alcoholic drink wanting. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest lateralized DA function in the NAcc, with L NAcc DA release most reflecting intoxication, R NAcc DA release most reflecting the flavor CS, and the conjoint CS + US producing a bilateral NAcc response.
RATIONALE: Although striatal dopamine (DA) is important in alcohol abuse, the nature of DA release during actual alcohol drinking is unclear, since drinking includes self-administration of both conditioned flavor stimuli (CS) of the alcoholic beverage and subsequent intoxication, the unconditioned stimulus (US). OBJECTIVES: Here, we used a novel self-administration analog to distinguish nucleus accumbens (NAcc) DA responses specific to the CS and US. METHODS: Right-handed male heavy drinkers (n = 26) received three positron emission tomography (PET) scans with the D2/D3 radioligand [(11)C]raclopride (RAC) and performed a pseudo self-administration task that separately administered a flavor CS of either a habitually consumed beer or the appetitive control Gatorade®, concomitant with the US of ethanol intoxication (0.06 g/dL intravenous (IV) administration) or IV saline. Scan conditions were Gatorade flavor + saline (Gat&Sal), Gatorade flavor + ethanol (Gat&Eth), and beer flavor + ethanol (Beer&Eth). RESULTS:Ethanol (US) reduced RAC binding (inferring DA release) in the left (L) NAcc [Gat&Sal > Gat&Eth]. Beer flavor (CS) increased DA in the right (R) NAcc [Gat&Eth > Beer&Eth]. The combination of beer flavor and ethanol (CS + US), [Gat&Sal > Beer&Eth], induced DA release in bilateral NAcc. Self-reported intoxication during scanning correlated with L NAcc DA release. Relative to saline, infusion of ethanol increased alcoholic drink wanting. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest lateralized DA function in the NAcc, with L NAcc DA release most reflecting intoxication, R NAcc DA release most reflecting the flavor CS, and the conjoint CS + US producing a bilateral NAcc response.
Authors: Juho Joutsa; Jarkko Johansson; Solja Niemelä; Antti Ollikainen; Mika M Hirvonen; Petteri Piepponen; Eveliina Arponen; Hannu Alho; Valerie Voon; Juha O Rinne; Jarmo Hietala; Valtteri Kaasinen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Dean F Wong; Hiroto Kuwabara; David J Schretlen; Katherine R Bonson; Yun Zhou; Ayon Nandi; James R Brasić; Alane S Kimes; Marika A Maris; Anil Kumar; Carlo Contoreggi; Jonathan Links; Monique Ernst; Olivier Rousset; Stephen Zukin; Anthony A Grace; Jae Sung Lee; Charles Rohde; Donald R Jasinski; Albert Gjedde; Edythe D London Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2006-09-13 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Zheng-Xiong Xi; Amy Hauck Newman; Jeremy G Gilbert; Arlene C Pak; Xiao-Qing Peng; Charles R Ashby; Leah Gitajn; Eliot L Gardner Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Karmen K Yoder; Evan D Morris; Cristian C Constantinescu; Tee-Ean Cheng; Marc D Normandin; Sean J O'Connor; David A Kareken Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Hans S Crombag; Jennifer M Bossert; Eisuke Koya; Yavin Shaham Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2008-10-12 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Anouk Schrantee; Lena Václavů; Dennis F R Heijtel; Matthan W A Caan; Willy Gsell; Paul J Lucassen; Aart J Nederveen; Jan Booij; Liesbeth Reneman Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Martin H Plawecki; Kyle A Windisch; Leah Wetherill; Ann E K Kosobud; Mario Dzemidzic; David A Kareken; Sean J O'Connor Journal: Alcohol Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: Marta Karas; Damian Brzyski; Mario Dzemidzic; Joaquín Goñi; David A Kareken; Timothy W Randolph; Jaroslaw Harezlak Journal: Stat Biosci Date: 2017-12-06
Authors: Brandon G Oberlin; Mario Dzemidzic; Jaroslaw Harezlak; Maria A Kudela; Stella M Tran; Christina M Soeurt; Karmen K Yoder; David A Kareken Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Judith Charpentier; Mario Dzemidzic; John West; Brandon G Oberlin; William J A Eiler; Andrew J Saykin; David A Kareken Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 2.376