Literature DB >> 25162414

Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a decade of experience.

Mohammad Javed Ali1, Alkis James Psaltis, Jae Murphy, Peter John Wormald.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a decade long experience with powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).
METHODS: A retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing powered endoscopic DCR was performed at this institution over a period of 11 years from 2002 to 2013. All patients completed a minimum of 3 months follow up following stent removal. Patient records were reviewed for demographic data, clinical and surgical profiles, adjunctive procedures, complications, and success rates at the last follow up. Anatomical success was defined as patent ostium on irrigation and functional success as free flow of dye into ostium on functional endoscopic dye test and resolution of epiphora.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-three powered endoscopic DCRs were performed on 214 patients. The mean age at surgery was 59.5 years (range, 3-95 years). All patients presented with epiphora. A total of 91.6% patients (196/214) had a primary DCR and 8.4% (18/214) had a revision DCR. In all, 50.4% patients (108/214) underwent adjunctive endonasal procedures. The mean follow up was 17.1 months (range, 3-103 months). At the last follow up, the final anatomical success was achieved in 96.9% cases of primary DCRs and 91.3% cases of revision DCRs. Functional success was achieved in 93% cases of primary DCRs and 86.9% cases of revision DCRs.
CONCLUSIONS: Powered endoscopic DCR is a safe procedure and offers excellent results both in primary and revision DCRs. The threshold to perform adjunctive endonasal procedures should be very low when indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25162414     DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0740-9303            Impact factor:   1.746


  7 in total

1.  Multifactorial assessment is essential to maximize the likelihood of good outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Serendipitous use of light source of operating microscope in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Swati Singh; Mohinder Singh; Vikas Mittal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Factors influencing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy outcome.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Nomura; Kazuya Arakawa; Mitsuru Sugawara; Hiroshi Hidaka; Jun Suzuki; Yukio Katori
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparison of the extrusion rate of Crawford tubes.

Authors:  Kira L Segal; Sarah H Van Tassel; Charles Kim; Nicole Hsu; Ashutosh Kacker; Gary J Lelli
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with circumostial mitomycin C injection, simultaneous limited septoplasty and the use of tissue glue.

Authors:  Rafal Nowak; Iwona Nowak
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-10

6.  Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy combined with canaliculus repair for the management of dacryocystitis with canalicular obstruction.

Authors:  Yunhai Tu; Zhenbin Qian; Jiao Zhang; Wencan Wu; Tianlin Xiao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy to treat congenital nasolacrimal canal dysplasia: a retrospective analysis in 40 children.

Authors:  Yan-Hui Cui; Cheng-Yue Zhang; Wen Liu; Qian Wu; Gang Yu; Li Li; Wen-Bin Wei
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.