| Literature DB >> 25160730 |
Kathryn M Broadhouse, Anna E Finnemore, Anthony N Price, Giuliana Durighel, David J Cox, Anthony David Edwards, Joseph V Hajnal, Alan M Groves.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many pathologies seen in the preterm population are associated with abnormal blood supply, yet robust evaluation of preterm cardiac function is scarce and consequently normative ranges in this population are limited. The aim of this study was to quantify and validate left ventricular dimension and function in preterm infants using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). An initial investigation of the impact of the common congenital defect patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) was then carried out.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25160730 PMCID: PMC4145259 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-014-0054-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Figure 1Comparison of a 4 chamber and short axis view at end diastole in a 1.4 kg control infant (left) and 1.4 kg PDA (right) infant with a shunt volume of 62% of LVO. Apex-base and mid cavity diameter measurements have been included for scale. Figure shows the apparent increase in left ventricular dimensions.
Bland-Altman intra- and inter-observer analysis for EDV, ESV, SV, LVO, EF, LVmass and LAC in 10 control infants
| | | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.6 | 7.1 | −0.2 – 0.5 | −0.5 | 11.6 | −0.4 – 0.6 | |
| 9.2 | 13.6 | −0.1 – 0.3 | 8.3 | 19.0 | −0.1 – 0.4 | |
| 1.6 | 8.7 | −0.3 – 0.4 | −3.5 | 12.7 | −0.6 – 0.4 | |
| 1.8 | 8.9 | −38.3 – 56.9 | −3.6 | 12.5 | −87.7 – 48.8 | |
| −1.9 | 4.2 | −4.6 – 1.7 | −3.2 | 6.6 | −7.3 – 2.5 | |
| 9.2 | 13.9 | −0.1 – 0.7 | 18.1 | 16.2 | 0.1 – 1.0 | |
| −3.4 | 12.7 | −0.9 – 0.5 | −11.11 | 23.1 | −2.2 – 1.0 | |
Mean and range of LVO, SV, EDV, LVmass (normalized by weight at scan), EF and HR in control infants
| 260 | 137 - 360 | |
| 1.83 | 1.31 - 2.29 | |
| 2.47 | 1.73 - 2.29 | |
| 1.39 | 0.85 - 1.91 | |
| 74 | 68 - 81 | |
| 141 | 101 - 176 |
Figure 2Normative ranges with trend line and 95% confidence limits of a: end diastolic volume (EDV), b: stroke volume (SV), c: left ventricular output (LVO), d: left ventricular (LV) mass, e: heart rate (HR) and f: ejection fraction (EF) in 45 infants with (●) and without (+) PDA.
Ductal shunt volumes: GA, cGA, birth weight (BW), weight (Wt) at scan and corresponding ductal shunt values as determined by PC CMR for 13 infants with PDA
| 24+3 | 27+3 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 74.2 | 435 |
| 26+3 | 28+3 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 66.5 | 336 |
| 28+4 | 31+4 | 1.40 | 1.43 | 62.0 | 359 |
| 25+4 | 31+6 | 0.68 | 1.13 | 52.7 | 275 |
| 26+1 | 30+1 | 0.99 | 1.08 | 51.6 | 221 |
| 27 | 29+2 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 48.7 | 169 |
| 27 | 29+1 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 26.0 | 86 |
| 26+2 | 36+1 | 0.91 | 2.40 | 23.5 | 72 |
| 25+5 | 27+5 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 15.5 | 45 |
| 25+3 | 30+4 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 15.0 | 58 |
| 27 | 29+1 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 13.5 | 46 |
| 27+2 | 31+6 | 0.90 | 1.22 | 12.1 | 39 |
| 31+3 | 32+1 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 3.4 | 17 |
t-test analysis of left ventricular output, function and hypertrophic measures showing mean and p-values for control and PDA groups
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 260(56) | 432(127) | <0.001 | |
| 1.82(0.29) | 2.81(0.83) | <0.001 | |
| 2.47(0.38) | 3.83(1.34) | 0.001 | |
| 1.39(0.23) | 2.46(0.59) | <0.001 | |
| 1.07 | 2.07 | <0.001 | |
| 0.54(0.08) | 0.68(0.17) | 0.02 | |
| 74(4) | 75(8) | 0.80 | |
| 77 | 80 | 0.69 | |
Figure 3Analysis of left ventricular mass. a: Population Frank Starling curve and b: left ventricular (LV) mass plotted against ejection fraction (EF) for infants with (●) and without (+) PDA.
Figure 4Normative range of the myocardial volume to end diastolic volume (LVmass/EDV) ratio against EDV in infants with (●) and without (+) PDA. The relationship between increased LVmass/EDV ratio and decreased EDV is illustrated.