| Literature DB >> 25160716 |
Jo Cecil1, Calum McHale1, Jo Hart2, Anita Laidlaw3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Burnout is prevalent in doctors and can impact on job dissatisfaction and patient care. In medical students, burnout is associated with poorer self-rated health; however, it is unclear what factors influence its development. This study investigated whether health behaviours predict burnout in medical students.Entities:
Keywords: alcohol; burnout; diet; lifestyle; medical students; physical activity
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25160716 PMCID: PMC4145104 DOI: 10.3402/meo.v19.25209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Educ Online ISSN: 1087-2981
Participant demographics
| Variable |
| % of respondents |
|---|---|---|
| Institution | ||
| St Andrews only | 128 | 36 |
| Manchester only | 195 | 54.8 |
| St Andrews then Manchester | 27 | 7.6 |
| Other University then Manchester | 6 | 1.7 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 124 | 34.8 |
| Female | 232 | 65.2 |
| Age group | ||
| 18–23 | 321 | 90.2 |
| 24–29 | 30 | 8.4 |
| ≥30 | 5 | 1.4 |
| Year of study | ||
| First | 141 | 39.6 |
| Second | 77 | 21.6 |
| Third | 66 | 18.5 |
| Fourth | 47 | 13.2 |
| Fifth | 25 | 7 |
MBI scoring for components of burnout and burned out prevalence by institution(s) attended, gender and year of study
| Emotional exhaustion (EE) | Depersonalisation (DP) | Personal accomplishment (PA) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
| Burned out | |
| All participants ( | 28.26 (10.08) | 195 (54.8) | 9.08 (4.30) | 121 (34) | 38.07 (9.39) | 166 (46.6) | 95 (26.7) |
| Institution | |||||||
| St Andrews ( | 28.59 (10.39) | 70 (54.7) | 9.26 (4.47) | 50 (39.1) | 38.16 (9.72) | 60 (46.9) | 39 (30.5) |
| Manchester ( | 28.15 (10.13) | 106 (54.4) | 8.76 (4.15) | 56 (28.7) | 37.31 (9.36) | 84 (43.1) | 45 (23.1) |
| St Andrews then Manchester ( | 27.96 (9.02) | 16 (59.3) | 10.22 (4.33) | 12 (44.4) | 42.37 (7.46) | 18 (66.7) | 9 (33.3) |
| Other than Manchester ( | 26 (7.77) | 3 (50) | 10.83 (4.92) | 3 (50) | 41.67 (5.32) | 4 (66.7) | 2 (33.3) |
| |
|
| 0.049 |
| |||
| Gender | |||||||
| Male ( | 27.68 (11.01) | 65 (52.4) | 9.85 (4.86) | 50 (40.3) | 36.28 (10.16) | 52 (31.3) | 38 (30.6) |
| Female ( | 28.57 (9.56) | 130 (56) | 8.68 (3.68) | 71 (30.6) | 39.03 (8.83) | 114 (68.7) | 57 (24.6) |
| |
| 0.014 | 0.008 |
| |||
| Year of study | |||||||
| 1 ( | 28.67 (10.36) | 79 (56) | 8.68 (4.30) | 42 (29.8) | 35.98 (10.14) | 52 (31.3) | 35 (24.8) |
| 2 ( | 29.42 (9.72) | 46 (59.7) | 9.05 (4.11) | 27 (35.1) | 37.25 (9.78) | 35 (21.1) | 21 (27.3) |
| 3 ( | 26.33 (9.69) | 34 (51.5) | 8.85 (4.08) | 20 (30.3) | 39.56 (7.84) | 38 (22.9) | 16 (24.2) |
| 4 ( | 26.74 (10.08) | 21 (44.7) | 9.62 (4.18) | 19 (40.4) | 40.13 (7.60) | 22 (13.3) | 13 (27.7) |
| 5 ( | 30.32 (10.29) | 15 (60) | 11.08 (5.28) | 13 (52) | 44.64 (6.02) | 19 (11.4) | 10 (40) |
| |
|
| <0.001 |
| |||
SD=standard deviation.
MBI cut-offs: high EE≥27; high DP≥10; low PA≤33; burned out if high in EE and DP; ns=not significance.
Final model in an 18-step backward stepwise regression analysis predicting MBI emotional exhaustion (EE) scores
| Variable (variable type/reference category) |
| 95% CI |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 27.16 (0.87) | 25.45; 28.87 | ||
| Year of study (categorical) | ||||
| Third year (reference: first year) | −3.36 (1.43) | −6.17; −0.54 | −0.13 | 0.020 |
| Level of physical activity (categorical) | ||||
| Low level (reference: high level) | 5.62 (1.99) | 1.69; 9.55 | 0.15 | 0.005 |
| FFQ Sweet Foods Score (continuous) | 0.09 (0.05) | −0.01; 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.081 |
| Smoking status (categorical) | ||||
| Ex-smoker (reference: never smoked) | 5.81 (2.29) | 1.29; 10.33 | 0.14 | 0.012 |
R 2 for step 1=0.096, ΔR 2 for final step=−0.005 (final model p<0.001).
p<0.05
p<0.01.
Final model in a 17-step backward stepwise regression analysis predicting MBI depersonalisation (DP) scores
| Variable (variable type/reference category) |
| 95% CI |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 7.17 (0.51) | 6.17; 8.16 | ||
| Institution (categorical) | ||||
| St Andrews only (reference: Manchester only) | 1.32 (0.53) | 0.27; 2.36 | 0.15 | 0.014 |
| Gender (categorical) | ||||
| Male (reference: female) | 1.05 (0.51) | 0.04; 2.06 | 0.12 | 0.041 |
| Year of study (categorical) | ||||
| Fourth year (reference first year) | 1.35 (0.73) | −0.08; 2.78 | 0.11 | 0.064 |
| Fifth year of study (reference: first year) | 3.06 (0.91) | 1.27; 4.86 | 0.19 | 0.001 |
| FFQ Savoury Foods Scores (continuous) | 0.04 (0.02) | −0.003; 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.066 |
R 2 for step 1=0.096, ΔR 2 for final step=−0.004 (final model p=0.001).
p<0.05
p<0.01.
Final model in a 15-step backward stepwise regression analysis predicting MBI personal accomplishment (PA) scores
| Variable (variable type/reference category) |
| 95% CI |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 33.99 (2.05) | 29.95; 38.04 | ||
| Gender (categorical) | ||||
| Male (reference: female) | −2.92 (1.11) | −5.09; −0.74 | −0.14 | 0.009 |
| Year of study (categorical) | ||||
| Third year (reference: first year) | 3.13 (1.34) | 0.50; 5.76 | 0.13 | 0.020 |
| Fourth year (reference first year) | 3.99 (1.54) | 0.96; 7.03 | 0.14 | 0.010 |
| Fifth year (reference: first year) | 8.69 (1.95) | 4.85; 12.54 | 0.24 | <0.001 |
| AUQ binge score (continuous) | 0.14 (0.05) | 0.04; 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.005 |
| Level of physical activity (categorical) | ||||
| Moderate level (reference: high level) | −2.37 (1.07) | −4.48; −0.27 | −0.12 | 0.027 |
| Low level (reference: high level) | −5.97 (1.91) | −9.73; −2.19 | −0.17 | 0.002 |
R 2 for step 1=0.162, ΔR 2 for final step=−0.005 (final model p<0.001).
p<0.05
p<0.01
p<0.001.