Literature DB >> 25160508

Small colony variants have a major role in stability and persistence of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Zulfiqar Ali Mirani1, Mubashir Aziz2, Seema Ismat Khan1.   

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the significance of small colony variants (SCVs) in biofilm life cycle of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). All of these MRSA and MSSA isolates were recovered from different food commodities. Molecular typing showed that 21 MRSA isolates carry SCCmecA type IV and belong to agr type II. Out of 15 MSSA isolates, 7 were found to carry agr type II, 5 agr type I and 2 agr type III. All of the MRSA isolates studied adopted biofilm mode of growth after exposure to sublethal doses of oxacillin. MSSA isolates, on the other hand, were biofilm producers by nature, that is, without exposure to any stress. The biomass of the biofilm reaches its maximum thickness after 48 h of incubation at 35 °C. It was noticed that biofilm population consists of wild type and SCVs. Moreover, the number of SCVs increases with the age of biofilm. The SCVs of MRSA were unable to readopt biofilm mode of growth independently, irrespective of the presence or absence of oxacillin. The SCVs of MSSA, on the other hand, quickly revert to normal life just after a single subculture and show biofilm formation without any stress. Molecular studies showed a parallel reduction in the expression of the genes icaA, sigβ and sarA, and also in the extracellular matrix production in SCVs of MRSA. This might be due to oxacillin as it seems to be a stress factor responsible for induction of biofilm formation in MRSA isolates. Contrary to the wild type, SCVs are metabolically inactive and do not respond to oxacillin, which is only active against the growing cells. Therefore, stress-responsive genes, that is, sigβ and sarA, are not induced. Conversely, MSSA isolates are natural biofilm producers without induction through any known factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25160508     DOI: 10.1038/ja.2014.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)        ISSN: 0021-8820            Impact factor:   2.649


  37 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Matthew R Parsek; Pradeep K Singh
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 15.500

2.  Direct demonstration of viable Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in an infected total joint arthroplasty. A case report.

Authors:  Paul Stoodley; Laura Nistico; Sandra Johnson; Leslie-Ann Lasko; Mark Baratz; Vikram Gahlot; Garth D Ehrlich; Sandeep Kathju
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNA III-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis.

Authors:  Philippe Gilot; Gérard Lina; Thierry Cochard; Bernard Poutrel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Method of evaluating effects of antibiotics on bacterial biofilm.

Authors:  B L Prosser; D Taylor; B A Dix; R Cleeland
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Biofilm bacteria: formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics.

Authors:  Merle E Olson; Howard Ceri; Douglas W Morck; Andre G Buret; Ronald R Read
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.310

6.  Characterization of colony morphology variants isolated from Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilms.

Authors:  Magee Allegrucci; Karin Sauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Effect of sub-lethal doses of vancomycin and oxacillin on biofilm formation by vancomycin intermediate resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Zulfiqar Ali Mirani; Nusrat Jamil
Journal:  J Basic Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.281

8.  Association between methicillin susceptibility and biofilm regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from device-related infections.

Authors:  Eoghan O'Neill; Clarissa Pozzi; Patrick Houston; Davida Smyth; Hilary Humphreys; D Ashley Robinson; James P O'Gara
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Triclosan resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressed as small colony variants: a novel mode of evasion of susceptibility to antiseptics.

Authors:  Roger Bayston; Waheed Ashraf; Toni Smith
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Effect of cinnamon oil on icaA expression and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Titik Nuryastuti; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher; Susi Iravati; Abu T Aman; Bastiaan P Krom
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  16 in total

1.  Antibacterial fatty acids destabilize hydrophobic and multicellular aggregates of biofilm in S. aureus.

Authors:  Zulfiqar Ali Mirani; Shagufta Naz; Fouzia Khan; Mubashir Aziz; Muhammad Naseem Khan; Seema Ismat Khan
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Maria Magana; Christina Sereti; Anastasios Ioannidis; Courtney A Mitchell; Anthony R Ball; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Michael R Hamblin; Maria Hadjifrangiskou; George P Tegos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  The ω Subunit Governs RNA Polymerase Stability and Transcriptional Specificity in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Andy Weiss; Brittney D Moore; Miguel H J Tremblay; Dale Chaput; Astrid Kremer; Lindsey N Shaw
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Posttranslational modification of a histone-like protein regulates phenotypic resistance to isoniazid in mycobacteria.

Authors:  Alexandra Sakatos; Gregory H Babunovic; Michael R Chase; Alexander Dills; John Leszyk; Tracy Rosebrock; Bryan Bryson; Sarah M Fortune
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 5.  Adaptive Metabolism in Staphylococci: Survival and Persistence in Environmental and Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Laura A Onyango; Mousa M Alreshidi
Journal:  J Pathog       Date:  2018-09-20

6.  Genomic and transcriptomic characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa small colony variants derived from a chronic infection model.

Authors:  Sharon Irvine; Boyke Bunk; Hannah K Bayes; Cathrin Spröer; James P R Connolly; Anne Six; Thomas J Evans; Andrew J Roe; Jörg Overmann; Daniel Walker
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2019-03-28

7.  Biofilm-Forming Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Survive in Kupffer Cells and Exhibit High Virulence in Mice.

Authors:  Takuto Oyama; Motoyasu Miyazaki; Michinobu Yoshimura; Tohru Takata; Hiroyuki Ohjimi; Shiro Jimi
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Ascorbic acid augments colony spreading by reducing biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Zulfiqar Ali Mirani; Muhammad Naseem Khan; Anila Siddiqui; Fouzia Khan; Mubashir Aziz; Shagufta Naz; Ayaz Ahmed; Seema Ismat Khan
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.699

9.  Relationship of cell surface hydrophobicity with biofilm formation and growth rate: A study on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Zulfiqar Ali Mirani; Aiman Fatima; Shaista Urooj; Mubashir Aziz; Mohammad Naseem Khan; Tanveer Abbas
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.699

Review 10.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Antimicrobial Peptides to Better Predict Efficacy.

Authors:  Derry K Mercer; Marcelo D T Torres; Searle S Duay; Emma Lovie; Laura Simpson; Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede; Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez; Deborah A O'Neil; Alfredo M Angeles-Boza
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.