BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is the standard of care for high-grade corrosive esophageal necrosis as assessed endoscopically. However, the inaccuracy of endoscopy in determining the depth of intramural necrosis may lead to unnecessary esophageal resection, with devastating consequences. Our aim was to evaluate the use of computed tomography (CT) for the emergency diagnostic workup of endoscopic high-grade corrosive esophageal necrosis. METHODS: In a before (2000-2007)/after (2007-2012) study of patients with grade 3b endoscopic esophageal necrosis, we compared outcomes after routine emergency esophagectomy versus selection for emergency esophagectomy based on CT evidence of transmural necrosis, defined as at least two of the following: esophageal-wall blurring, periesophageal-fat blurring, and the absence of esophageal-wall enhancement. Survival estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Compared to the routine-esophagectomy group (n = 125), the CT group (n = 72) had better overall survival in the crude analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI], 0.21-0.85; P = 0.015) and in the analysis matched on gender, age, and ingested agent (HR, 0.36; 95 %CI, 0.16-0.79; P = 0.011). No deaths occurred among patients managed without emergency esophagectomy based on CT findings, and one-third of CT-group patients had their functioning native esophagus at last follow-up. Self-sufficiency for eating and breathing was more common (84 % vs. 65 %; relative risk [RR], 1.27; 95 %CI, 1.04-1.55; P = 0.016) and repeat suicide less common (4 % vs. 15 %; RR, 0.27; 95 %CI, 0.09-0.82; P = 0.019) in the CT group. CONCLUSION: The decision to perform emergency esophagectomy for endoscopic high-grade corrosive esophageal injury should rely on CT findings.
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is the standard of care for high-grade corrosive esophageal necrosis as assessed endoscopically. However, the inaccuracy of endoscopy in determining the depth of intramural necrosis may lead to unnecessary esophageal resection, with devastating consequences. Our aim was to evaluate the use of computed tomography (CT) for the emergency diagnostic workup of endoscopic high-grade corrosive esophageal necrosis. METHODS: In a before (2000-2007)/after (2007-2012) study of patients with grade 3b endoscopic esophageal necrosis, we compared outcomes after routine emergency esophagectomy versus selection for emergency esophagectomy based on CT evidence of transmural necrosis, defined as at least two of the following: esophageal-wall blurring, periesophageal-fat blurring, and the absence of esophageal-wall enhancement. Survival estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Compared to the routine-esophagectomy group (n = 125), the CT group (n = 72) had better overall survival in the crude analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI], 0.21-0.85; P = 0.015) and in the analysis matched on gender, age, and ingested agent (HR, 0.36; 95 %CI, 0.16-0.79; P = 0.011). No deaths occurred among patients managed without emergency esophagectomy based on CT findings, and one-third of CT-group patients had their functioning native esophagus at last follow-up. Self-sufficiency for eating and breathing was more common (84 % vs. 65 %; relative risk [RR], 1.27; 95 %CI, 1.04-1.55; P = 0.016) and repeat suicide less common (4 % vs. 15 %; RR, 0.27; 95 %CI, 0.09-0.82; P = 0.019) in the CT group. CONCLUSION: The decision to perform emergency esophagectomy for endoscopic high-grade corrosive esophageal injury should rely on CT findings.
Authors: Amadeu C R Nunes; José M Romãozinho; José M Pontes; Vitor Rodrigues; Manuela Ferreira; Dário Gomes; Diniz Freitas Journal: Hepatogastroenterology Date: 2002 Nov-Dec
Authors: Hyun Ho Ryu; Kyung Woon Jeung; Byung Kook Lee; Jun Hwan Uhm; Young Hun Park; Min Ho Shin; Hyun Lee Kim; Tag Heo; Yong Il Min Journal: Clin Toxicol (Phila) Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.467
Authors: E Sarfati; L Jacob; J M Servant; B d'Acremont; E Roland; T Ghidalia; M Celerier Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Mircea Chirica; Cécile de Chaisemartin; Nicolas Goasguen; Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Sarah Zohar; Pierre Cattan; Marie-Dominique Brette; Emile Sarfati Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Oscar Núñez; Cecilia González-Asanza; Gema de la Cruz; Gerardo Clemente; Rafael Bañares; Enrique Cos; Pedro Menchén Journal: Med Clin (Barc) Date: 2004-11-06 Impact factor: 1.725
Authors: Giuseppe Cutaia; Marianna Messina; Sara Rubino; Elisabetta Reitano; Leonardo Salvaggio; Ilenia Costanza; Francesco Agnello; Ludovico La Grutta; Massimo Midiri; Giuseppe Salvaggio; Rosalia Gargano Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2021-03-08
Authors: Romain Ducoudray; Antoine Mariani; Helene Corte; Aurore Kraemer; Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Emile Sarfati; Pierre Cattan; Mircea Chirica Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Mircea Chirica; Michael D Kelly; Stefano Siboni; Alberto Aiolfi; Carlo Galdino Riva; Emanuele Asti; Davide Ferrari; Ari Leppäniemi; Richard P G Ten Broek; Pierre Yves Brichon; Yoram Kluger; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Gil Frey; Nelson Adami Andreollo; Federico Coccolini; Cristina Frattini; Ernest E Moore; Osvaldo Chiara; Salomone Di Saverio; Massimo Sartelli; Dieter Weber; Luca Ansaloni; Walter Biffl; Helene Corte; Imtaz Wani; Gianluca Baiocchi; Pierre Cattan; Fausto Catena; Luigi Bonavina Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Manuel F Struck; André Beilicke; Albrecht Hoffmeister; Ines Gockel; André Gries; Hermann Wrigge; Michael Bernhard Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 2.953