Jeongyoung Park1, Karen Jones. 1. Center for Workforce Studies, Association of American Medical Colleges, 655 K Street NW Suite 100, Washington, DC, 20001-2399, USA, jpark14@gwu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Growth in the care of hospitalized patients by hospitalists has the potential to increase the productivity of office-based primary care physicians (PCPs) by allowing them to focus on outpatient practice. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine the association between utilization of hospitalists and the productivity of office-based PCPs. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: The cross-sectional study was conducted using the 2008 Health Tracking Physician Survey Restricted Use File linked to the Area Resource File. We analyzed a total of 1,158 office-based PCPs representing a weighted total of 97,355 physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Utilization of hospitalists was defined as the percentage of a PCP's hospitalized patients treated by a hospitalist. The measures of PCPs' productivity were: (1) number of hospital visits per week, (2) number of office and outpatient clinic visits per week, and (3) direct patient care time per visit. KEY RESULTS: We found that the use of hospitalists was significantly associated with a decreased number of hospital visits. The use of hospitalists was also associated with an increased number of office visits, but this was only significant for high users. Physicians who used hospitalists for more than three-quarters of their hospitalized patients had an extra 8.8 office visits per week on average (p = 0.05), which was equivalent to a 10 % increase in productivity over the predicted mean of 87 visits for physicians who did not use hospitalists. We did not find any significant differences in direct patient care time per visit. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the increase in productivity for the one-third of PCPs who use hospitalists extensively may not be sufficient to offset the current loss of PCP workforce. However, our findings provide cautious optimism that if more PCPs effectively and efficiently used hospitalists, this could help mitigate a PCP shortage and improve access to primary care services.
BACKGROUND: Growth in the care of hospitalized patients by hospitalists has the potential to increase the productivity of office-based primary care physicians (PCPs) by allowing them to focus on outpatient practice. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine the association between utilization of hospitalists and the productivity of office-based PCPs. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: The cross-sectional study was conducted using the 2008 Health Tracking Physician Survey Restricted Use File linked to the Area Resource File. We analyzed a total of 1,158 office-based PCPs representing a weighted total of 97,355 physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Utilization of hospitalists was defined as the percentage of a PCP's hospitalized patients treated by a hospitalist. The measures of PCPs' productivity were: (1) number of hospital visits per week, (2) number of office and outpatient clinic visits per week, and (3) direct patient care time per visit. KEY RESULTS: We found that the use of hospitalists was significantly associated with a decreased number of hospital visits. The use of hospitalists was also associated with an increased number of office visits, but this was only significant for high users. Physicians who used hospitalists for more than three-quarters of their hospitalized patients had an extra 8.8 office visits per week on average (p = 0.05), which was equivalent to a 10 % increase in productivity over the predicted mean of 87 visits for physicians who did not use hospitalists. We did not find any significant differences in direct patient care time per visit. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the increase in productivity for the one-third of PCPs who use hospitalists extensively may not be sufficient to offset the current loss of PCP workforce. However, our findings provide cautious optimism that if more PCPs effectively and efficiently used hospitalists, this could help mitigate a PCP shortage and improve access to primary care services.
Authors: Vineet M Arora; Megan L Prochaska; Jeanne M Farnan; Michael J D'Arcy; Korry J Schwanz; Lisa M Vinci; Andrew M Davis; David O Meltzer; Julie K Johnson Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Andrew D Auerbach; Robert M Wachter; Patricia Katz; Jonathan Showstack; Robert B Baron; Lee Goldman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-12-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Gulshan Sharma; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Dong Zhang; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jean L Freeman; James S Goodwin Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 56.272