Yong-Fang Kuo1, James S Goodwin. 1. Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0177, USA. yokuo@utmb.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hospitalist care has grown rapidly, in part because it is associated with decreased length of stay and hospital costs. No national studies examining the effect of hospitalist care on hospital costs or on medical utilization and costs after discharge have been done. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of hospitalist care with hospital length of stay, hospital charges, and medical utilization and Medicare costs after discharge. DESIGN: Population-based national cohort study. SETTING: Hospital care of Medicare patients. PATIENTS: A 5% national sample of enrollees in Medicare parts A and B with a primary care physician who were cared for by their primary care physician or a hospitalist during medical hospitalizations from 2001 to 2006. MEASUREMENTS: Length of stay, hospital charges, discharge location and physician visits, emergency department visits, rehospitalization, and Medicare spending within 30 days after discharge. RESULTS: In propensity score analysis, hospital length of stay was 0.64 day less among patients receiving hospitalist care. Hospital charges were $282 lower, whereas Medicare costs in the 30 days after discharge were $332 higher (P < 0.001 for both). Patients cared for by hospitalists were less likely to be discharged to home (odds ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.86]) and were more likely to have emergency department visits (odds ratio, 1.18 [CI, 1.12 to 1.24]) and readmissions (odds ratio, 1.08 [CI, 1.02 to 1.14]) after discharge. They also had fewer visits with their primary care physician and more nursing facility visits after discharge. LIMITATION: Observational studies are subject to selection bias. CONCLUSION: Decreased length of stay and hospital costs associated with hospitalist care are offset by higher medical utilization and costs after discharge. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging and National Cancer Institute.
BACKGROUND: Hospitalist care has grown rapidly, in part because it is associated with decreased length of stay and hospital costs. No national studies examining the effect of hospitalist care on hospital costs or on medical utilization and costs after discharge have been done. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of hospitalist care with hospital length of stay, hospital charges, and medical utilization and Medicare costs after discharge. DESIGN: Population-based national cohort study. SETTING: Hospital care of Medicare patients. PATIENTS: A 5% national sample of enrollees in Medicare parts A and B with a primary care physician who were cared for by their primary care physician or a hospitalist during medical hospitalizations from 2001 to 2006. MEASUREMENTS: Length of stay, hospital charges, discharge location and physician visits, emergency department visits, rehospitalization, and Medicare spending within 30 days after discharge. RESULTS: In propensity score analysis, hospital length of stay was 0.64 day less among patients receiving hospitalist care. Hospital charges were $282 lower, whereas Medicare costs in the 30 days after discharge were $332 higher (P < 0.001 for both). Patients cared for by hospitalists were less likely to be discharged to home (odds ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.86]) and were more likely to have emergency department visits (odds ratio, 1.18 [CI, 1.12 to 1.24]) and readmissions (odds ratio, 1.08 [CI, 1.02 to 1.14]) after discharge. They also had fewer visits with their primary care physician and more nursing facility visits after discharge. LIMITATION: Observational studies are subject to selection bias. CONCLUSION: Decreased length of stay and hospital costs associated with hospitalist care are offset by higher medical utilization and costs after discharge. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging and National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Jorge T Go; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Andrew Auerbach; Jeffrey Schnipper; Tosha B Wetterneck; David Gonzalez; David Meltzer; Peter J Kaboli Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Gulshan Sharma; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Dong Zhang; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jean L Freeman; James S Goodwin Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: K Robin Yabroff; Elizabeth B Lamont; Angela Mariotto; Joan L Warren; Marie Topor; Angela Meekins; Martin L Brown Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Deborah E Barnes; Robert M Palmer; Denise M Kresevic; Richard H Fortinsky; Jerome Kowal; Mary-Margaret Chren; C Seth Landefeld Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Robert E Burke; Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga; Cari Levy; Allan V Prochazka; Eric A Coleman; Adit A Ginde Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Douglas J Koo; Tabitha N Goring; Leonard B Saltz; Marina Kerpelev; Chhavi B Kumar; Cori Salvit; Helen H Chung; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Steven C Martin; Barbara C Egan Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Jennifer P Stevens; David J Nyweide; Sha Maresh; Laura A Hatfield; Michael D Howell; Bruce E Landon Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Daniel T Coghlin; Joanna K Leyenaar; Mark Shen; Lora Bergert; Richard Engel; Daniel Hershey; Leah Mallory; Caroline Rassbach; Tess Woehrlen; David Cooperberg Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2014-01
Authors: John T Schousboe; Misti L Paudel; Brent C Taylor; Lih-Wen Mau; Beth A Virnig; Kristine E Ensrud; Bryan E Dowd Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 3.402