| Literature DB >> 25157978 |
Stephan Wessels1, Reza Ahmad Sharifi2, Liane Magdalena Luehmann1, Sawichaya Rueangsri3, Ina Krause1, Sabrina Pach4, Gabriele Hoerstgen-Schwark1, Christoph Knorr5.
Abstract
Owing to the demand for sustainable sex-control protocols in aquaculture, research in tilapia sex determination is gaining momentum. The mutual influence of environmental and genetic factors hampers disentangling the complex sex determination mechanism in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Previous linkage analyses have demonstrated quantitative trait loci for the phenotypic sex on linkage groups 1, 3, and 23. Quantitative trait loci for temperature-dependent sex reversal similarly reside on linkage group 23. The anti-Müllerian hormone gene (amh), located in this genomic region, is important for sexual fate in higher vertebrates, and shows sexually dimorphic expression in Nile tilapia. Therefore this study aimed at detecting allelic variants and marker-sex associations in the amh gene. Sequencing identified six allelic variants. A significant effect on the phenotypic sex for SNP ss831884014 (p<0.0017) was found by stepwise logistic regression. The remaining variants were not significantly associated. Functional annotation of SNP ss831884014 revealed a non-synonymous amino acid substitution in the amh protein. Consequently, a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) based genotyping assay was developed and validated with a representative sample of fish. A logistic linear model confirmed a highly significant effect of the treatment and genotype on the phenotypic sex, but not for the interaction term (treatment: p<0.0001; genotype: p<0.0025). An additive genetic model proved a linear allele substitution effect of 12% in individuals from controls and groups treated at high temperature, respectively. Moreover, the effect of the genotype on the male proportion was significantly higher in groups treated at high temperature, giving 31% more males on average of the three genotypes. In addition, the groups treated at high temperature showed a positive dominance deviation (+11.4% males). In summary, marker-assisted selection for amh variant ss831884014 seems to be highly beneficial to increase the male proportion in Nile tilapia, especially when applying temperature-induced sex reversal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25157978 PMCID: PMC4144872 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Experimental design to obtain a genetically female (XX) population in order to study temperature effects on the male proportion in a selected line of Nile tilapia.
Figure 2Gene structure, pairwise linkage disequilibrium (r) between SNPs, and functional annotation of the Nile tilapia amh gene derived from the Ensembl database.
a) Gene structure of the amh gene derived from Scaffold GL831234.1. Exons 1–7 (E1–7) are represented by filled grey boxes. Blue and red dashed lines show positions of polymorphic SNPs in the amh gene. SNP ss831884015 (C>T) is located −225 bp upstream of the start codon ATG, SNP ss831884018 was located in the intron between exon 6 and 7. Variants ss831884014 and ss831884019 were found in exons 6 and 7. SNP ss831884014 (G>C) and ss831884019 (C>T) were missense mutations leading to amino acid changes from glutamic acid to glutamine (codons Gaa/Caa) and alanine to valine (codons gCg/gTg). Table 1 deals with the functional annotation of all six SNPs. b) Pairwise linkage disequilibrium heat map of four polymorphic allelic variants in the Nile tilapia amh gene. c) Partial DNA to protein translation of exon 6 in the Nile tilapia amh gene, depicting a non-synonymous amino acid substitution at position 376 of the putative amh-protein (indicated by black arrow) coded by an allelic variant ss831884014 of scaffold GL831234.1. d) Partial comparative alignment of the amh genomic exon 6 sequences for six teleost species derived from the Ensembl database. e) Partial comparative alignment of the amh protein sequence for six teleost species derived from the Ensembl database.
Functional annotation of six allelic variants in the Nile tilapia amh gene.
| SNP ID | Allele1 | Consequence1 | Position | Position in cDNA | Position in CDS | Position in protein | Amino acid change1 | Codon change1 |
|
| C/T | upstream gene variant | 5′UTR | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| A/T | intron variant | Intron 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| C/G | synonymous variant | Exon 5 | 696 | 696 | 232 | G (no change) |
|
|
| G/C | missense variant | Exon 6 | 1126 | 1126 | 376 | E/Q |
|
|
| G/A | intron variant | Intron 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| T/C | missense variant | Exon 7 | 1157 | 1157 | 386 | A/V |
|
(1The annotation of functional effects was carried out using SNPEff 2.0.5 (http://SNPeff.sourceforge.net/) using the Oreochromis niloticus genome sequence deposited in the Ensembl database (scaffold GL831234.1)).
Allele frequencies, polymorphism information content (PIC), heterozygosity and allelic diversity for four allelic variants in the amh gene detected in a genetically all-female (XX) Nile tilapia population.
| SNP locus | n individuals | Allele frequency | PIC | Heterozygosity | Allelic diversity |
|
| 93 | 0.90 (C) | 0.1595 | 0.1935 | 0.1748 |
|
| 931 | 0.71 (C) | 0.3245 | 0.4194 | 0.4075 |
| 4302 | 0.58 (C) | 0.3677 | 0.5186 | 0.4856 | |
|
| 93 | 0.71 (A) | 0.3245 | 0.4194 | 0.4075 |
|
| 93 | 0.84 (C) | 0.2340 | 0.3226 | 0.2706 |
(1 Initially 93 individuals were Sanger-sequenced for the amh gene. The genotyped sample was comprised of three families including the corresponding three dams and sires; 2 In total 337 individuals were investigated using the FRET-assay, in order to obtain a total of 430 genotypes at SNP ss831884014 (including the before mentioned Sanger-sequenced individuals)).
Effect of SNP ss831884014 genotypes, temperature treatment (28°C vs. 36°C from 10–20 dpf) and their interaction on the phenotypic sex in Nile tilapia.
| Scale | Effect |
|
| ||||
| df Numerator | F-statistics | Pr>F | df Numerator | F-statistics | Pr>F | ||
| Logit link | treatment | 1 | 4.60 | <.0326 | 1 | 15.49 | <.0001 |
| function | SNP genotype | 1 | 12.66 | 0.0004 | 2 | 5.33 | 0.0025 |
| treat*SNP genotype | 1 | 2.63 | 0.1059 | 2 | 1.83 | 0.1618 | |
| Identity link | treatment | 1 | 8.18 | <.0044 | 1 | 24.02 | <.0001 |
| function | SNP genotype | 1 | 12.15 | 0.0005 | 2 | 6.87 | 0.0012 |
| treat*SNP genotype | 1 | 0.68 | 0.4102 | 2 | 1.35 | 0.2593 | |
(The effects were estimated using a GLM with binominal error distribution and logit link function and were validated using a GLM with identity link function; Equation 1: Linear regression model ; Equation 2: Fixed effect model .
Figure 3Relationship between male proportion and genotype at amh variant ss831884014 in Nile tilapia, reared at 28°C or 36°C from 10 to 20 days post fertilisation.
Linear least-square regression of the genotypic values (LSmean male proportion) for genotypes C/C, G/C, and G/G at locus ss831884014 of the amh gene (Scaffold GL831234.1). The genotypic values were derived from the regression models by either excluding the interaction between SNP and treatment (LSmeans 1: red and blue line) or by including the interaction between SNP and treatment (LSmeans 2: red and blue triangles) as effect class. Numbers of individuals per genotype were 26/79/20 and 114/144/47 for genotypes C/C, G/C, and G/G, for the control group (28°C) and the group reared at high temperature (36°C), respectively.
Dominance and additive effects of the variant ss831884014 on the male proportion in Nile tilapia reared at 28°C or 36°C from 10–20 dpf.
| Genetic parameter | Treatment | Estimate1 | Back transformed Lsmeans2 | Estimate3 | t-value1 | p-Value1 | |
| Dominance | = μCG−(μCC+μGG)/2 | 28°C | 0.1719 (0.6250) | −0.0400 | −0.0400 (0.0868) | 0.28 | 0.7834 |
| = μCG−(μCC+μGG)/2 | 36°C | 0.4709 (0.2484) | 0.1135 | 0.1135 (0.0560) | 1.90 | 0.0586 | |
| Homozygous additive allele effect | = (μCC−μGG)/2 | 28°C | 1.2372 (0.5512) | 0.1673 | 0.1673 (0.0693) | 2.24 | 0.0253 |
| = (μCC−μGG)/2 | 36°C | 0.5381 (0.1830) | 0.1299 | 0.1299 (0.0404) | 2.94 | 0.0035 | |
(Values given brackets are standard errors of the estimates; 1) Parameters were derived from GLM with binominal error distribution and logit link function; 2) Dominance and homozygous additive allele effects were derived from back transformed LSmeans; 3) Parameters were derived from GLM with identity link function).