| Literature DB >> 25157974 |
Xiaowei Jia1, Qiang Jia2, Zhihu Zhang2, Weimin Gao3, Xianan Zhang1, Yong Niu1, Tao Meng1, Bin Feng2, Huawei Duan1, Meng Ye1, Yufei Dai1, Zhongwei Jia4, Yuxin Zheng1.
Abstract
Formaldehyde (FA) is a well-known irritant, and it is suggested to increase the risk of immune diseases and cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate the distribution of major lymphocyte subsets and cytokine expression profiles in the peripheral blood of FA-exposed workers. A total of 118 FA-exposed workers and 79 controls were enrolled in the study. High performance liquid chromatography, flow cytometry, and cytometric bead array were used to analyze FA in air sample and formic acid in urine, blood lymphocyte subpopulations, and serum cytokines, respectively. The FA-exposed workers were divided into low and high exposure groups according to their exposure levels. The results showed that both the low and high FA-exposed groups had a significant increase of formic acid in urine when compared to the controls. Both the low and high exposure groups had a significant increase in the percentage of B cells (CD19+) compared to the control group (p<0.01). A significant increase in the percentage of the natural killer (NK) cells (CD56+) was observed in the low exposure group compared to the control (p = 0.013). Moreover, the FA-exposed workers in both exposure groups showed a significant higher level of IL-10 but lower level of IL-8 than the control (p<0.01). Subjects in the high exposure group had a higher level of IL-4 but a lower level of IFN-γ than the control (p<0.05). Finally, there is a significant correlation between the levels of IL-10, IL-4, and IL-8 and formic acid (p<0.05). The findings from the present study may explain, at least in part, the association between FA exposure and immune diseases and cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25157974 PMCID: PMC4144836 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The FA exposure levels in FA-exposed workers and controls.
| Groups | Number of workers | Number of air samples | FA concentrations (ppm) | |
| mean | range | |||
| High exposure | 70 | 16 | 0.63 | 0.36–1.53 |
| Low exposure | 48 | 8 | 0.15 | 0.07–0.19 |
| Controls | 79 | 4 | <0.008 | |
The limit of detection (0.008 ppm) was used to present the FA level in the control industry.
Demographic data of FA-exposed workers and controls.
| Variables | Control group (n = 79) | Low exposure group (n = 48) | High exposure group (n = 70) | P | P | P |
| C vs L | C vs H | L vs H | ||||
| Age (years, mean±SE) | 36.84±1.01 | 36.04±1.17 | 35.8±0.91 | 0.60 | 0.44 | 0.88 |
| Sex (male, | 62 (78.48) | 35 (72.92) | 53 (75.71) | 0.47 | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| BMI (mean±SE) | 24.59±0.42 | 24.03±0.44 | 24.06±0.34 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.96 |
| Current smokers (yes, n(%)) | 26 (32.91) | 12 (25.00) | 25 (35.71) | 0.35 | 0.72 | 0.22 |
| Alcohol user (yes, n(%)) | 44 (55.70) | 28 (58.33) | 41 (58.57) | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.98 |
| FA exposure history (years, mean±SE) | -- | 3.89±0.41 | 4.29±0.35 | -- | -- | 0.46 |
one-way ANOVA for difference between any two groups.
χ2tests for differences between any two groups.
one-way ANOVA for difference between the low and high exposure groups.
“C vs L” means “control vs low exposure group”, “C vs H” means “control vs high exposure group” and “L vs H” means “low exposure group vs high exposure group”.
Figure 1The level of formic acid in FA-exposed workers (n = 48 in the low exposure group and n = 70 in the high exposure group) and the control (n = 79).
Sample was detected for the level of formic acid by high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC). The final formic acid concentration was adjusted by urine creatinine.
Figure 2The distribution of major lymphocyte subsets in FA-exposed workers (n = 48 in the low exposure group and n = 70 in the high exposure group) and the control (n = 79).
Percentage of different lymphocytes was presented in the three groups. Aliquots of EDTA whole blood were stained with fluorescence labeled antibodies to the CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD19+ and/or CD56+ lymphocytes. Values represent mean±SE; * p<0.05 comparing with control.
Figure 3Comparison of serum cytokine levels between FA-exposed workers (n = 23 in the low exposure group and n = 29 in the high exposure group) and the non-exposed controls (n = 46).
Serum levels of IL-10 (a), IL-4 (b), IFN-γ (c), and IL-8 (d) were measured by multiplexed bead immunoassay. Mann–Whitney U-test was performed to compare FA-exposed workers with the control.
Figure 4Correlation between formic acid and serum cytokine levels.
Correlation between formic acid and IL-10 (a), IL-4 (b), IFN-γ (c), or IL-8 (d).