The structurally related exocyclic guanine adducts α-hydroxypropano-dG (α-OH-PdG), γ-hydroxypropano-dG (γ-OH-PdG), and M1dG are formed when DNA is exposed to the reactive aldehydes acrolein and malondialdehyde (MDA). These lesions are believed to form the basis for the observed cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of acrolein and MDA. In an effort to understand the enzymatic pathways and chemical mechanisms that are involved in the repair of acrolein- and MDA-induced DNA damage, we investigated the ability of the DNA repair enzyme AlkB, an α-ketoglutarate/Fe(II) dependent dioxygenase, to process α-OH-PdG, γ-OH-PdG, and M1dG in both single- and double-stranded DNA contexts. By monitoring the repair reactions using quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometry, it was established that AlkB can oxidatively dealkylate γ-OH-PdG most efficiently, followed by M1dG and α-OH-PdG. The AlkB repair mechanism involved multiple intermediates and complex, overlapping repair pathways. For example, the three exocyclic guanine adducts were shown to be in equilibrium with open-ring aldehydic forms, which were trapped using (pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine (PFBHA) or NaBH4. AlkB repaired the trapped open-ring form of γ-OH-PdG but not the trapped open-ring of α-OH-PdG. Taken together, this study provides a detailed mechanism by which three-carbon bridge exocyclic guanine adducts can be processed by AlkB and suggests an important role for the AlkB family of dioxygenases in protecting against the deleterious biological consequences of acrolein and MDA.
The structurally related exocyclicguanine adducts α-hydroxypropano-dG (α-OH-PdG), γ-hydroxypropano-dG (γ-OH-PdG), and M1dG are formed when DNA is exposed to the reactive aldehydesacrolein and malondialdehyde (MDA). These lesions are believed to form the basis for the observed cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of acrolein and MDA. In an effort to understand the enzymatic pathways and chemical mechanisms that are involved in the repair of acrolein- and MDA-induced DNA damage, we investigated the ability of the DNA repair enzyme AlkB, an α-ketoglutarate/Fe(II) dependent dioxygenase, to process α-OH-PdG, γ-OH-PdG, and M1dG in both single- and double-stranded DNA contexts. By monitoring the repair reactions using quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometry, it was established that AlkB can oxidatively dealkylate γ-OH-PdG most efficiently, followed by M1dG and α-OH-PdG. The AlkB repair mechanism involved multiple intermediates and complex, overlapping repair pathways. For example, the three exocyclicguanine adducts were shown to be in equilibrium with open-ring aldehydic forms, which were trapped using (pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine (PFBHA) or NaBH4. AlkB repaired the trapped open-ring form of γ-OH-PdG but not the trapped open-ring of α-OH-PdG. Taken together, this study provides a detailed mechanism by which three-carbon bridge exocyclicguanine adducts can be processed by AlkB and suggests an important role for the AlkB family of dioxygenases in protecting against the deleterious biological consequences of acrolein and MDA.
Reactive aldehydes,
such as acrolein and malondialdehyde (MDA),
react with DNA and form exocyclic adducts. Acrolein, an α,β-unsaturated
aldehyde commonly found in tobacco smoke[1] and other exogenous sources (petroleum industry waste,[2] automobile exhaust,[3,4] and overcooked
food[5]) is a mutagenic agent[6−10] that has been implicated in the etiology of lung cancer.[11,12] Acrolein is also formed endogenously as a byproduct of lipid peroxidation,[13,14] alongside structurally related molecules such as MDA. As a reactive
aldehyde, acrolein condenses with deoxyguanosine (dG) through a Michael
addition and subsequent cyclization[15−17] to form two exocyclic
adducts: α-OH-PdG (3-(2′-deoxy-β-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-6-hydroxypyrimido[1,2-α]purin-10(3H)-one) and γ-OH-PdG (3-(2′-deoxy-β-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-8-hydroxypyrimido[1,2-α]purin-10(3H)-one) (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Reactions of the environmental
pollutant acrolein and of the lipid
peroxidation byproduct malondialdehyde with DNA guanine bases generate
the structurally similar exocyclic deoxyguanosine lesions α-OH-PdG,
γ-OH-PdG, and M1dG.
Reactions of the environmental
pollutant acrolein and of the lipid
peroxidation byproduct malondialdehyde with DNA guanine bases generate
the structurally similar exocyclicdeoxyguanosine lesions α-OH-PdG,
γ-OH-PdG, and M1dG.The acrolein–DNA adducts have deleterious biological
consequences
and are believed to underlie the mutagenic effects of acrolein[18−21] and its ability to promote carcinogenesis.[22,23] α-OH-PdG can block DNA replication in human cells and can
cause G to A and G to T mutations.[24,25] By contrast,
γ-OH-PdG is efficiently bypassed by certain polymerases in both
bacterial and mammalian cells;[26−29] however, γ-OH-PdG can also form inter- and
intrastrand cross-links[30−33] (via an open-ring aldehydic form), which are difficult
to bypass and can cause mutations.[34−36]MDA is an important
biomarker of lipid peroxidation, a deleterious
reaction between cellular lipids and reactive oxygen species produced
by inflammatory processes.[13,14,37] Similar to acrolein, MDA can also form an exocyclic dG adduct, M1dG (3-(2′-deoxy-β-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)pyrimido[1,2-α]purin-10(3H)-one).[38] This adduct is both a strong
block to replication and mutagenic,[39−41] properties that may
contribute to inflammation-associated humanmalignancies, including
aging[42] and cancer.[13,37]Given the toxicity and mutagenicity of the acrolein- and MDA-derived
exocyclicdeoxyguanosine adducts, it is important to investigate if
these adducts are substrates for DNA repair pathways. While the nucleotide
excision repair (NER) pathway can remove these lesions from DNA,[23] acrolein, the agent responsible for generating
the exocyclic dG lesions, inhibits NER.[23] Little is known about the contribution of a direct reversal repair
pathway for removal of acrolein- and MDA-derived exocyclicguanine
DNA adducts.AlkB, the Escherichia coli direct
reversal DNA repair enzyme, can efficiently repair a wide range of
DNA and RNA alkyl lesions.[43−53] As an Fe(II)- and α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase, AlkB
uses molecular oxygen to oxidize and remove simple alkyl DNA lesions
(such as 3-methylcytosine,[51] 1-methyladenine,[51] 3-methylthymine,[51] 6-methyladenine,[50] 1- methylguanine (m1G),[51] 2-methylguanine(m2G),[52] and 2-ethylguanine(e2G)[52]) and exocyclic
bridged lesions (N1,N6-ethenoadenine (εA),[46,47] N1,N6-ethanoadenine (EA),[49,50] 3,N4-ethenocytosine (εC),[46,48] hydroxy-3,N4-ethanocytosine,[48,53] and hydroxy-3,N4-propanocytosine).[48,53] Given the ability of AlkB to remove alkyl groups from both N1[51] and N2 positions[52] of guanine, we suspected that the exocyclicguanine adducts α-OH-PdG, γ-OH-PdG, and M1dG
could also be potential substrates for AlkB.This study investigated
the ability of AlkB to repair the acrolein-
and MDA-derived exocyclic dG lesions in single-straned (ssDNA) or
double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). We established that all three exocyclic
dG lesions can exist in open-ring forms in the sequence context studied,
and we also investigated whether these open-ring forms are substrates
for AlkB repair. Using high-resolution quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF)
MS, we found that AlkB can oxidize all three exocyclic dG adducts,
in both the open- and closed-ring forms. The AlkB activity on the
lesions was more efficient in ssDNA than in dsDNA, with the base opposite
the lesion dictating the repair efficiency. Among the three lesions
studied, γ-OH-PdG was most efficiently repaired, followed by
M1dG and α-OH-PdG, respectively. By identifying and
characterizing the AlkB reaction intermediates and products using
MS, MS/MS, and biochemical trapping experiments, a model for the chemical
mechanism of repair of exocyclic dG lesions by AlkB is proposed. The
observation that these important lesions are oxidized by AlkB provides
evidence that direct reversal enzymes, such as AlkB, may play important
roles as modulators of the biological consequences of acrolein and
MDA.
Experimental Procedures
Oligonucleotide
Synthesis
Oligonucleotide 16-mers of
sequence 5′-GAAGACCTXGGCGTCC-3′ (X = adduct)
bearing exocyclicguanine adducts, α-OH-PdG,[54,55] γ-OH-PdG,[56,57] and M1dG[58] (Figure 1) were prepared
using the solid-phase methods[59] and were
deprotected, purified, and characterized as described previously.
Table 1 shows the calculated MWs of all the
oligonucleotides used in this study and their observed intermediates.
To determine the oligonucleotides’ concentrations, the extinction
coefficients (ε) of normal DNA bases at 260 nm were used; alkyl-modified
bases were approximated as guanines.
Table 1
Calculated
and Observed Monoisotopic
Molecular Weights of Oligonucleotides Observed in the Present Study
lesion or base (structures)
MW (calcd) of neutral species
calcd monoisotopic m/z (−4 charge)
obsvd monoisotopic m/z (−4 charge)
(1a)/(1b)
4960.88
1239.21
1239.16
1239.19
1239.20
(2)/(18)
4942.87
1234.71
1234.68
1234.70
(3a)/(3b)/(21)
4976.88
1243.21
1243.17
1243.18
1243.24
(4)/(20)
4958.87
1238.71
1238.67
1238.68
1238.70
(5a)/(5b)
4960.88
1239.21
1239.23
(6)
4904.86
1225.21
1225.17
1225.19
(7)
4940.86
1234.21
1234.17
1234.19
(8)
4956.85
1238.20
1238.19
1238.24
(9)/(13)/(14)
4974.86
1242.71
1242.73
1242.69
(10)
4992.87
1247.21
1247.19
1247.25
(11a)/(11b)/ (12a)/(12b)
4958.87
1238.71
not observed
(15)
4944.89
1235.21
1235.16
(16)
4962.90
1239.72
1239.71
(17)
4978.89
1243.72
1243.71
(19)
4958.68
1239.67
1239.67
AlkB Repair of Exocyclic
dG Lesions (α-OH-PdG, γ-OH-PdG,
and M1dG) in Single- and Double-Stranded DNA Oligonucleotides
AlkB incubations were performed with the AlkBΔN11 protein,
a version of AlkB lacking the first 11 amino acids. This truncated
protein has been previously shown to have activity similar to that
of wild-type AlkB.[49] The AlkBΔN11
protein was expressed in BL21(DE3) cells and purified as described
previously.[49] The AlkB incubations were
performed at 37 °C for 2 h in a reaction buffer containing 45
mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 0.9 mM α-ketoglutarate, 67 μM Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2·6H2O, and 1.8 mM ascorbate, followed by HPLC/Q-TOF MS analysis. Typically,
100 pmol DNA was reacted with 5 μM AlkB (or enzyme diluent for
control reactions) in the presence of all cofactors in a 20 μL
reaction volume. The AlkB incubations with double-stranded DNA were
performed under similar conditions except that prior to AlkB addition
1.2 equiv of complementary oligonucleotides were annealed by heating
the mixture at 65 °C for 5 min. The mixtures were cooled at a
rate of 0.1 °C/s to 4 °C and then used in AlkB reactions
as described above.
Quantification of AlkB Repair Efficiency
The AlkB repair
efficiencies were estimated from the fraction of starting material
converted into intermediates and products (Table 2). These values were determined by integrating the extracted
ion chromatogram (EIC) peaks corresponding to each of the species
observed in the AlkB reactions (starting material, intermediates,
and products) and calculating the percentage of each species formed
after AlkB incubation relative to the total amount of material (Table 3). In each reaction, the total amount of material
was calculated by summing the areas corresponding to the starting
material and all intermediates and products derived from the starting
material. All of the values were background-corrected for the amount
of species (intermediate or product) that may have been present in
the AlkB untreated control reactions.
Table 2
Percentage
of Lesion-Containing Oligonucleotides
Chemically Modified by AlkB in a 2 h Reaction
X = lesion
α-OH-PdG (%)
γ-OH-PdG (%)
M1dG (%)
ssDNA
8.0
58.8
31.0
dsDNA (T: X)
1.6
17
45.5
dsDNA (G: X)
1.0
10.4
22.0
dsDNA (C: X)
0.6
<0.5
18.1
dsDNA (A: X)
0.7
11.2
15.2
Table 3
Intermediates and Products from the
2 h Incubation of AlkB with α-OH-PdG (A), γ-OH-PdG (B),
and M1dG (C)
(A)
α-OH-PdG (%)
intermediates
(%)
product (%)
X = lesion (α-OH-PdG)
(1a)/(1b) 1239.20
(2) 1234.70
(3a)/(3b) 1243.18
(4) 1238.68
(6) 1225.20
ssDNA
74.0
18.0
5.5
2.5
<0.1
dsDNA (T: X)
84.4
14.0
1.3
0.3
<0.1
dsDNA (G: X)
84.0
14.9
0.9
0.1
<0.1
dsDNA (C: X)
84.7
14.6
0.3
0.4
<0.1
dsDNA (A: X)
84.2
15.1
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
Trapping Experiments of
DNA Adducts with PFBHA
Trapping
reactions of oligonucleotides with PFBHA were performed in water at
room temperature for 1 h using 5 μM DNA and 500 μM PFBHA
in a 10 μL incubation volume, followed by HPLC/Q-TOF MS analysis,
as described previously.[50] The calculated
MWs of the trapped intermediates are included in Table S1.
Melting Temperature Analysis
Melting
temperatures were
measured on the dsDNA obtained by mixing the 16-mer oligonucleotides
containing lesions with equimolar amounts of the complementary oligonucleotides
containing each of the four possible natural bases (C, T, G, and A)
opposite the lesion site. The oligonucleotides (4 μM in a total
volume of 25 μL) were mixed in AlkB reaction buffer (45 mM HEPES,
pH 8, 0.9 mM α-ketoglutarate, 1.8 mM ascorbate, 67 μM
Fe(II)) supplemented with the high-resolution melting dye LCGreen
Plus (Idaho Technologies Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) to a final concentration
of 1×. Annealing was done by heating at 75 °C for 5 min,
followed by a slow cooling (0.1 °C/s) to 4 °C. Melting temperature, Tm, was measured using a Roche LightCycler 480
spectrophotometer, by heating the samples from 37 to 95 °C at
a rate of 0.1 °C/s and recording fluorescence five times every
degree Celsius. Data analysis was performed using LightCycler480 software.
For each oligonucleotide and complement pair, three independent measurements
were performed and averaged.
Reduction of Exocyclic dG Lesions by NaBH4 and Their
Repair by AlkB
Reduction of exocylic dG lesions (α-OH-PdG,
γ-OH-PdG, and M1dG) was performed by incubating ∼1
nmol of 16-mer oligonucleotide in 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 8.0,
with ∼1 M NaBH4 for 1 h at 37 °C in 10 μL
reaction volume. To prevent excess pressure from hydrogengas accumulation
from the NaBH4 hydrolysis, the tubes were uncapped and
continuously spun in a microfuge during the incubation. Subsequently,
the excess NaBH4 and salts were removed by passing the
reaction mixtures through homemade dry-spun Sephadex G50 Fine (Amersham
Biosciences) columns. After concentration by centrifugation under
vacuum, the purified reduced oligonucleotides were used in AlkB reactions
using the conditions described previously. All samples (untreated,
NaBH4 treated, and NaBH4 then AlkB treated)
were analyzed using HPLC-ESI-TOF mass spectrometry.
HPLC/Q-TOF
MS and MS/MS Analysis
Oligonucleotide analyses
were performed using Agilent Q-TOF 6510 mass spectrometer (Palo Alto,
CA) setup as follows: needle voltage, 3.5 kV; nitrogen drying gas,
8 L/min; heated capillary, 340 °C; and nebulizer, 30 psig. The
reaction mixtures were separated by HPLC on a Zorbax SB-Aq column
(2.1 × 150 mm; 3.5 μm; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto,
CA) at a 0.2 mL/min flow rate at room temperature. Solvents were 10
mM ammonium acetate in water (A) and 100% acetonitrile (B). A linear
gradient of 1–18% B over 21 min was used. Data analysis was
performed using the Agilent MassHunter workstation software.LC–MS/MS analyses were performed on the Agilent 6510 Q-TOF
instrument, operated in the negative ion mode with the following parameters:
gas temperature, 340 °C; ESI capillary voltage, 3.5 kV; nebulizer
pressure, 30 psi; drying nitrogengas, 8 L/min; and fragmentation
energy, 30–35 V. The theoretical fragmentation pattern of a
16-mer oligonucleotide is shown in Figure 2A; the expected monoisotopic masses of the fragments were calculated
using Mongo Oligo Mass Calculator, version 2.06 (http://mods.rna.albany.edu/Masspec-Toolbox). A typical fragmentation spectrum (e.g., intermediate 3a/3b) is shown in Figure 2B. The
comparison between the calculated and observed m/z values for the MS/MS spectrum of 3a/3b is shown in Figure 2C. MS/MS analyses
of the observable reactants, intermediates, and products for all of
the AlkB reactions with 16-mer oligonucleotides containing α-OH-PdG,
γ-OH-PdG, and M1dG are included in the Supporting Information (Figures S10–S17
and Tables S2–S9).
Figure 2
MS/MS analysis of prototypic 16-mer oligonucleotide
containing
the AlkB-oxidized form of γ-OH-PdG. (Top) Predicted collision-induced
dissociation (CID) fragmentation pattern of the 16-mer oligonucleotide.
X denotes the lesion or repair reaction intermediate or product. (Bottom)
MS/MS fragmentation spectrum of 16-mer containing the AlkB-oxidized
form of γ-OH-PdG. A comparison of predicted and observed m/z values for the MS/MS fragmentation
pattern shown at the bottom of the figure is included in the Supporting Information (Table S6).
MS/MS analysis of prototypic 16-mer oligonucleotide
containing
the AlkB-oxidized form of γ-OH-PdG. (Top) Predicted collision-induced
dissociation (CID) fragmentation pattern of the 16-mer oligonucleotide.
X denotes the lesion or repair reaction intermediate or product. (Bottom)
MS/MS fragmentation spectrum of 16-mer containing the AlkB-oxidized
form of γ-OH-PdG. A comparison of predicted and observed m/z values for the MS/MS fragmentation
pattern shown at the bottom of the figure is included in the Supporting Information (Table S6).
Results
Exocyclic Guanine DNA Adducts
Are Substrates for AlkB in ssDNA
The ability of AlkB to repair
acrolein- and MDA-derived exocyclic
dG adducts was measured by incubating site-specifically modified 16-mer
oligonucleotides with purified AlkB protein. Following a 2 h incubation
at 37 °C, the reaction mixtures were analyzed using high-resolution
MS.[50,52] For each lesion, experiments were conducted
in both the presence and absence of the AlkB protein, with all of
the necessary cofactors. Figure 3 shows representative
MS spectra corresponding to each oligonucleotide containing an exocyclic
dG lesion before and after AlkB treatment. The molecular weight (MW)
of each of the 16-mer oligonucleotides employed was calculated, from
which the −4 charge monoisotopic mass (all 12C, 14N, etc.) was determined (Table 1).
For example, the MW of the 16-mer containing the α-OH-PdG lesion
is 4960.88 (Da); therefore, its monoisotopic −4 charge state
has a theoretical m/z of 1239.21.
In this case, an m/z of 1239.20
was observed experimentally (Figure 3a), which
correlated well with the theoretical value (Table 1). Because the MS conditions used throughout this study produced
robust −4 charge states for all the oligonucleotides analyzed,
all of the m/z numbers discussed
below refer to −4 charge states, unless otherwise specified.
The chemical structures corresponding to the peaks labeled in Figure 3 as well as their proposed AlkB-catalyzed transformations
are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 3
Q-TOF mass spectrometry
analysis of reactants and products of the
oligonucleotides containing exocyclic guanine lesions incubated with
AlkB for 2 h. Data represent the −4 charge envelopes; multiple
ion mass peaks associated with each envelope reflect mostly the number
of 13C atoms in each −4 charge packet. The monoisotopic
peak (all 12C, 14N, etc.) value is labeled above
each peak envelope. (a) α-OH-PdG; (b) α-OH-PdG + AlkB;
(c) γ-OH-PdG; (d) γ-OH-PdG + AlkB; (e) M1dG;
and (f) M1dG + AlkB.
Figure 4
Chemical structures and proposed pathways for AlkB-mediated exocyclic
guanine lesions transformation: (a) α-OH-PdG (dotted border)
and γ-OH-PdG (solid border); (b) M1dG (dashed border).
Q-TOF mass spectrometry
analysis of reactants and products of the
oligonucleotides containing exocyclicguanine lesions incubated with
AlkB for 2 h. Data represent the −4 charge envelopes; multiple
ion mass peaks associated with each envelope reflect mostly the number
of 13C atoms in each −4 charge packet. The monoisotopic
peak (all 12C, 14N, etc.) value is labeled above
each peak envelope. (a) α-OH-PdG; (b) α-OH-PdG + AlkB;
(c) γ-OH-PdG; (d) γ-OH-PdG + AlkB; (e) M1dG;
and (f) M1dG + AlkB.Chemical structures and proposed pathways for AlkB-mediated exocyclicguanine lesions transformation: (a) α-OH-PdG (dotted border)
and γ-OH-PdG (solid border); (b) M1dG (dashed border).Interestingly, the mass spectrum
of α-OH-PdG in the absence
of AlkB showed two peaks: a major peak at m/z 1239.20, which corresponds to the 16-mer containing the
α-OH-PdG lesion (structure 1a, calculated m/z 1239.21), and a minor peak at m/z 1234.70, which corresponds to a dehydrated
form of α-OH-PdG (structure 2, calculated m/z 1234.71) (Figures 3a and 4a). The chemical structure of 2 was confirmed by MS/MS fragmentation analysis (Figures S10–S11 and Tables S2–S3). Upon addition of AlkB protein, two new products were observed
with m/z 1238.68 and 1243.18 (Figures 3b, S1a, and S2). The
product with mass 1243.18 was assigned to the oxidized form of the
parent α-OH-PdG lesion (structure 3a, calculated m/z 1243.21), consistent with the 4 m/z units increase, which in the −4
charge state corresponds to 16 Da, the mass of an oxygen atom. The
product with mass 1238.68 is similarly 4 m/z units higher than the dehydrated form at 1234.70, suggesting
that it could be an oxidized form of 2 (structure 4, calculated m/z 1238.71)
(Figures S1 and S2). However, structure 4 could also arise from dehydration of the oxidized intermediate
(structure 3a), being 4.5 m/z units lower than the 1243.18 species (which, in the −4
charge state, corresponds to the loss of a water molecule, 18 Da).
These data suggest that, under these reaction conditions, AlkB can
oxidize the α-OH-PdG lesion (and its dehydrated form), transforming
it into the diol 3a that could spontaneously lose the
exocyclic bridge to restore the parental deoxyguanosine (Figure 4a). However, the fully repaired deoxyguanosine product
was not observed, perhaps because the amount of oxidized intermediate 3a formed was relatively small, with only 5.5% conversion
(Table 3A).The oligonucleotide containing
γ-OH-PdG had an experimental m/z of 1239.23 (structure 5a, calculated m/z 1239.21). Incubation
with AlkB resulted in the conversion of about 60% of the γ-OH-PdG
starting material into four new species (Figure 3d and Table 2) with m/z values of 1225.17 (dG, structure 6), 1243.17
(diol intermediate 3a), 1238.67 (single-dehydration product 4), and 1234.17 (double-dehydration product 7, M1dG). Relative mass differences between these peaks
(Figure S1b) were used to propose chemical
structures for all of the intermediates (Figure 4a), which were further confirmed by an MS/MS fragmentation analysis
(Figures S12–S14 and Tables S4–S6). The appearance of these intermediates and products suggests the
following reaction course for direct reversal of γ-OH-PdG damage:
AlkB oxidizes the methylene group adjacent to the N2-position of γ-OH-PdG to generate α,γ-dihydroxy-PdG
(3a), which can release MDA to form undamaged guanine
(6). The final step of MDA release from 3a is analogous to the release of glyoxal from the εA glycol
intermediate that forms when AlkB repairs the εA lesion.[46] However, intermediate 3a can also
dehydrate to form 4 and, upon loss of another water molecule,
intermediate 7, which is the MDA adduct M1dG (Figure 4a). As will be shown later, M1dG is itself a substrate for AlkBoxidation. However, given
the small amounts M1dG formed in the reaction of γ-OH-PdG
with AlkB, the intermediates of the M1dG reaction with
AlkB likely were below the limit of detection and therefore were not
observed.When the oligonucleotide containing M1dG
(starting material m/z of 1234.19)
was incubated with AlkB
under similar conditions, four new mass envelopes were observed in
the mass spectrum (Figures 3f and S1c), besides the unreacted starting material.
These peaks suggested a reaction course for direct reversal of M1dG damage by AlkB (Figure 4b). Specifically,
the mass envelope at m/z 1238.19
was consistent with the AlkB-catalyzed formation of an epoxide for
M1dG (structure 8 in Figure 4b, calculated m/z 1238.20,
Table 1). Hydrolysis of the epoxide would generate
glycol 9, observed at m/z 1242.69, consistent with the calculated m/z 1242.71. The additional species observed at m/z 1247.19 indicated the presence of the trihydroxylated
intermediate 10 (calculated m/z 1247.21), which would be the hydration product of glycol 9. The spontaneous loss of 2-hydroxy-MDA from the trihydroxylated
intermediate 10 would generate the undamaged guanine
base, observed at m/z 1225.19 (calculated m/z 1225.21) (Figures 3f and 4b). The assignment of intermediates
was confirmed by MS/MS fragmentation analysis (Figures S15–S17 and Tables S7–S9).
Exocyclic Guanine
DNA Adducts Are Substrates for AlkB in dsDNA
AlkB can repair
alkylated nucleic acid bases in both ssDNA and
dsDNA. While repair in the single-stranded context is typically more
efficient,[61] there are examples of lesions
that are repaired by AlkB equally well in ssDNA and dsDNA.[62] Therefore, it was of interest to investigate
whether the acrolein- and MDA-derived exocyclic dG lesions were also
substrates for AlkB in dsDNA.AlkB repair reactions were carried
out with each of the three exocyclic dG adducts opposite each of the
four canonical bases (T, C, G, and A) (Figures
S3–S5). The amount of the starting material converted
by AlkB (Table 2) was estimated by integrating
the extracted ion chromatograms (EIC) of each peak in the mass spectra
(see Experimental Procedures for details).
Likewise, the relative amounts of the intermediates and repair products
formed in each case were also estimated (Table 3A–C). The data show that the efficiency of AlkB-mediated oxidation
of exocyclic dG adducts depended not only on the type of lesion (as
seen in ssDNA) but also on the nature of the base placed opposite
the lesion. In general, the oxidation was less efficient in dsDNA
compared with that in ssDNA, with M1dG being a notable
exception, for which the maximum conversion of starting material was
observed in dsDNA when placed opposite T (Table 2). As a general trend, lesions were more efficiently converted when
placed opposite T than opposite any other base. The smallest conversion
was observed when lesions were placed opposite C (Table 2).The quantification of intermediates and fully repaired
product
for each of the AlkB reactions above provided some additional insights.
For γ-OH-PdG, the AlkB conversion was at least 3-fold lower
in dsDNA compared with that in ssDNA, and the amount of diol intermediate
(structure 3a) formed in the dsDNA reaction was reduced
by a similar amount. However, the amount of fully repaired product,
dG, was disproportionally reduced (by at least 10-fold with respect
to ssDNA, Table 3B), indicating that the final
step of MDA release from 3a is impeded when AlkB repair
occurs in dsDNA. For M1dG opposite T, the AlkB conversion
was higher in dsDNA than that in ssDNA. However, the amount of fully
repaired product was maximal in ssDNA (8.1%) compared with that in
dsDNA (1.3–4.6%) (Table 3C), suggesting,
as before, that the final step of the release of the oxidized exocyclic
bridge from intermediate 10 was impeded in dsDNA. For
α-OH-PdG in dsDNA, AlkBoxidation was even less efficient than
that in ssDNA, with the oxidized intermediates detected at correspondingly
lower levels (Table 3A). Just as in ssDNA,
no fully repaired dG product was observed in the AlkB reaction of
α-OH-PdG in dsDNA. However, it appears that the equilibrium
between the hydrated (structure 1a) and dehydrated (structure 2) forms of α-OH-PdG shifted toward the structure 1a in dsDNA.
Cytosine Opposite Exocyclic Guanine Adducts
Stabilizes Duplex
DNA
The reactions of AlkB with dsDNA consistently showed
that when the acrolein- and MDA-derived exocyclic dG adducts were
placed opposite C the efficiency of repair was significantly diminished
(Table 2). We hypothesize that this effect
was due to the ability of exocyclic dG lesions to exist in open-ring
structures.[63−65] In the case of γ-OH-PdG[64] and M1dG,[65] the presence
of the cognate base pairing partner (dC) in the opposite strand has
been shown to induce the opening of the exocyclic ring to expose the
Watson–Crick base-pairing side of the damaged guanine and allow
it to form hydrogen bonds. To test this hypothesis in our sequence
context, the thermal melting temperatures (Tm) of the oligonucleotides containing exocyclic dG adducts
opposite all four canonical bases were measured (Table 4). Consistent with this hypothesis and previous observations,[64,65] the melting temperatures containing γ-OH-PdG and M1dG opposite C were the highest in each case (as compared to other
complementary bases) and approached the Tm of a duplex containing a canonical G:C base pair at the lesion site.
When compared with a normal guanine, the presence of M1dG increased the melting temperature of the duplex when opposite
T, G, or A. This effect was likely due to the extended aromatic ring
system of M1dG, which allowed for additional favorable
stacking interactions. By contrast with the other two lesions, the
oligonucleotide containing α-OH-PdG was not stabilized opposite
any of the four canonical bases. This observation was consistent with
the fact that the open-ring structure of α-OH-PdG would allow
only the N2 position of guanine to interact
with the opposite base, while the N1 position would be still blocked.
Table 4
Melting Temperature of Oligonucleotides
Containing α-HOPG, γ-HOPG, M1dG, or G Annealed
to a Complementary Strand Containing C, T, G, or A Opposite the Lesion
Site
oligonucleotides
C
T
G
A
G
63.6 ± 0.3
57.1 ± 0.2
54.1 ± 0.3
56.5 ± 0.3
α-HOPG
53.0 ± 0.5
49.8 ± 0.2
53.4 ± 0.2
52.8 ± 0.7
γ-HOPG
59.0 ± 0.3
54.5 ± 0.3
55.0 ± 0.3
54.0 ± 0.3
M1dG
62.2 ± 0.3
60.1 ± 0.3
56.6 ± 0.2
56.6 ± 0.2
PFBHA Trapping Reveals Open-Ring Forms of
Exocyclic Guanine
DNA Lesions
The γ-OH-PdG[63,64,66] and M1dG[67−70] lesions have been reported to
equilibrate between ring-closed and ring-open forms. In dsDNA, γ-OH-PdG
predominantly exists in open-ring form when placed opposite dC,[64] whereas in ssDNA, it exists mostly in the closed-ring
form. In both cases, γ-OH-PdG could be trapped by peptides,
with the conjugation being more effective in dsDNA than in ssDNA.[66] The reversible, hydrolytic ring-opening of M1dG has also been well-studied,[67−69,65] with the ring-open form of M1dG predominating in dsDNA
when M1dG is placed opposite dC.[65,67]The presence of open-ring forms of the three exocyclic dG
lesions was studied in our sequence context by incubating the site-specifically
modified oligonucleotides used in the AlkB repair studies with O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine (PFBHA), a
nucleophilic alkoxyamine that forms stable oxime linkages with free
aldehydes.[50] After 1 h at room temperature,
the reaction mixtures were analyzed using high-resolution MS (Figure 5). The calculated and experimentally observed m/z values for the oligonucleotides trapped
with PFBHA are listed in Table S1.
Figure 5
Q-TOF mass
spectrometry analysis of the PFBHA trapping reactions
of oligonucleotides containing exocyclic guanine lesions. Data represent
the −4 charge envelopes, as described in Figure 3. (a) α-OH-PdG; (b) α-OH-PdG + PFBHA; (c) γ-OH-PdG;
(d) γ-OH-PdG + PFBHA; (e) M1dG; and (f) M1dG + PFBHA.
Q-TOF mass
spectrometry analysis of the PFBHA trapping reactions
of oligonucleotides containing exocyclicguanine lesions. Data represent
the −4 charge envelopes, as described in Figure 3. (a) α-OH-PdG; (b) α-OH-PdG + PFBHA; (c) γ-OH-PdG;
(d) γ-OH-PdG + PFBHA; (e) M1dG; and (f) M1dG + PFBHA.All three oligonucleotides
containing the exocyclic dG lesions
were trapped by PFBHA, indicating that they can potentially exist
in open-ring forms containing free aldehyde groups (Figure 5). In the case of γ-OH-PdG, PFBHA trapping
provides strong evidence that the exocyclic adduct (5a) exists in equilibrium with an open-ring aldehyde form (5b). For M1dG (7), however, the complete trapping
with PFBHA does not unequivocally demonstrate the existence of the
ring-open aldehyde forms (11b or 12b), because
PFBHA can react directly with the closed-ring form of M1dG and generate the oxime product without the formation of a free
aldehyde. This alternative course of reaction is based on the observation
that the rate of ring opening of M1dG at neutral pH in
water is slower than the rate of trapping of M1dG with
hydroxylamine.[71]The presence of
PFBHA completely trapped the oligonucleotide containing
γ-OH-PdG and M1dG. The parent peak of γ-OH-PdG
at m/z 1239.21 (calculated m/z 1239.21) shifted quantitatively to a PFBHA-trapped species
at m/z 1287.97 (calculated m/z 1287.97). Similarly, the parent peak
of M1dG at m/z 1234.20
(calculated m/z 1234.21) was completely
converted to a PFBHA-trapped species at m/z 1287.47 (calculated m/z 1287.46). In the case of α-OH-PdG, 1a (observed m/z 1239.20, calculated m/z 1239.21) can form an open-ring structure (1b) that can be trapped with PFBHA. However, as described
previously, 1a is also in equilibrium with the imine 2, which could also react with PFBHA to give a trapped product.
Only a partial trapping of the α-OH-PdG was observed (PFBHA-trapped
species at m/z 1287.98, calculated m/z 1287.97), with the relative amounts
of untrapped oligonucleotides suggesting that PFBHA reacted primarily
with 1b and not with 2. Assuming PFBHA trapping
of 1b is fast, these data also suggest that the formation
of the open-ring form of α-OH-PdG is slower than that for γ-OH-PdG.
The Exocyclic dG Adducts Reduced with NaBH4 Are Also
Substrates for AlkB
Given the presence of the open-ring forms
of the three exocyclic dG lesions, it was of interest to investigate
whether AlkB could also act on the open-ring forms. Sodium borohydride
(NaBH4) buffered with sodium phosphate was used to lock
the open-ring forms by reducing the open-ring aldehydes to alcohols,[72] which were detected using high-resolution MS
(Figure 6). For γ-OH-PdG, upon treatment
with NaBH4, the parent peak at m/z 1239.23 was quantitatively converted to a new peak at m/z 1239.71, consistent with the addition
of two hydrogens. Because there are no functional groups reducible
by NaBH4 in the closed-ring structure of γ-OH-PdG,
or on any other normal base, the peak at m/z 1239.71 must correspond to the open-ring alcohol of γ-OH-PdG,
structure 16 (calculated m/z 1239.72) (Figures 6b and S7). Similarly, when the oligonucleotide containing α-OH-PdG
was treated with NaBH4, the parent peak at m/z 1239.16 shifted to m/z 1239.67 (Figures 6a and S6). Similar to the argument made for γ-OH-PdG,
the only functional group that could be reduced by NaBH4 is the aldehyde of the open-ring form of α-OH-PdG (structure 1b, Figure 4a) to generate an open-ring
alcohol (structure 19, calculated m/z 1239.67). The dehydrated form of α-OH-PdG (structure 2), a cyclic imine, was also reduced by NaBH4,
as suggested by the change in the isotopic distribution pattern and
the expansion of the peak envelope toward higher masses (Figure 6a). These changes are consistent with the appearance
of a peak at m/z 1235.16 (Figures 6a and S6), which presumably
corresponded to a fully saturated 1,N2-propano-dG (structure 15, calculated m/z 1235.21) (Figure 6a).
Both reduction products (19 and 15) are
consistent with the reported NaBH4 reduction of the α-OH-PdG
free nucleoside.[54] Additional evidence
for the formation of 15 was obtained by running the NaBH4 reaction at a lower pH (5.8 instead of 7.0), which improved
the yield of reduction of 2 (Figure
S9). However, even at low pH, reduction of 2 was
not quantitative, perhaps due to the lesser reactivity of the aromatically
stabilized cyclic imine toward NaBH4 compared to that of
an aldehyde.
Figure 6
Q-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of the reactions of oligonucleotides
containing exocyclic guanine lesions with NaBH4 and the
subsequent incubation of the reduced forms with AlkB for 2 h. Each
peak is labeled with its monoisotopic m/z value, in the −4 charge state. The corresponding chemical
structures and proposed transformations are included next to each
set of mass spectrometry ion traces. (a) (Top) α-OH-PdG, (Middle)
α-OH-PdG + NaBH4, (Bottom) α-OH-PdG + NaBH4 + AlkB. (b) (Top) γ-OH-PdG, (Middle) γ-OH-PdG
+ NaBH4, (Bottom) γ-OH-PdG + NaBH4 + AlkB.
(c) (Top) M1dG, (Middle) M1dG + NaBH4, (Bottom) M1dG + NaBH4 + AlkB.
Q-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of the reactions of oligonucleotides
containing exocyclicguanine lesions with NaBH4 and the
subsequent incubation of the reduced forms with AlkB for 2 h. Each
peak is labeled with its monoisotopic m/z value, in the −4 charge state. The corresponding chemical
structures and proposed transformations are included next to each
set of mass spectrometry ion traces. (a) (Top) α-OH-PdG, (Middle)
α-OH-PdG + NaBH4, (Bottom) α-OH-PdG + NaBH4 + AlkB. (b) (Top) γ-OH-PdG, (Middle) γ-OH-PdG
+ NaBH4, (Bottom) γ-OH-PdG + NaBH4 + AlkB.
(c) (Top) M1dG, (Middle) M1dG + NaBH4, (Bottom) M1dG + NaBH4 + AlkB.When exposed to NaBH4, the M1dG-containing
oligonucleotide (observed m/z 1234.19,
calculated m/z 1234.21) was converted
to a reduced species detected at m/z 1234.70 (Figures 6c and S8). This product has been previously reported to be structure 18 (Figure 6c).[73,74] The reduced ring-open form of M1dG requires the initial
addition of a water molecule to produce 11a or 12a (calculated m/z 1238.71)
(Figure 4b), which could subsequently be reduced
with NaBH4. However, the open-ring form of M1dG is known to enolize readily and thus is not very reactive toward
NaBH4.[75] Consistent with this
fact, a product with an m/z of 1239.21
corresponding to a reduced version of 11a or 12a could not be detected (Figures 6c and S8); therefore, under the reaction conditions,
M1dG could not be trapped as an open-ring species by NaBH4. Nevertheless, the reaction of AlkB with the reduced form
of M1dG provided additional insights into the regioselectivity
of the AlkB repair reactions on exocyclic dG structures.After
NaBH4 treatment, the oligonucleotides were first
purified using Sephadex G-50 columns to remove excess NaBH4 and other salts and were then allowed to react with AlkB under the
same conditions as those previously described. AlkB produced more
fully repaired product (dG) when incubated with NaBH4-treated
lesions as compared to the incubations with untreated lesions. For
α-OH-PdG, these reaction conditions produced detectable levels
of fully repaired dG (6). The amount of the reduced open-ring
alcohol 19 did not change upon treatment with AlkB, whereas
the amount of 15 was diminished in the AlkB reaction
(Figure 6a). These observations indicated that
the fully repaired dG was not generated from the reduced open-ring
form 19, but rather from the 1,N2-propano-dG reduced intermediate (15) via two
successive oxidations by AlkB, which would generate 3a (Figure 6a).For the reduced ring-open
form of γ-OH-PdG (16), the AlkB reaction intermediates
were consistent with oxidation
at the carbon attached to the N2 position
of guanine with subsequent release of a three-carbon aldehyde to generate
fully repaired dG (Figure 6b). This reaction
was very efficient, with most of the starting material being consumed
along with a high yield (∼50%) of dG. For NaBH4-treated
M1dG, the AlkB reaction generated several intermediates
(Figure 6c), consistent with oxidation of 18 at the carbon attached to the N2 position of guanine to generate 12a, which upon dehydration
yielded the original M1dG lesion (structure 7, observed m/z 1234.23). Subsequently,
M1dG (7) reacted with AlkB, as shown before
(Figures 3f and 4b),
to generate epoxide 8, triol 10, and, upon
spontaneous loss of 2-hydroxy-MDA, the fully repaired product, dG.
In an alternative reaction course, 18 could react with
AlkB to generate epoxide 20 and upon hydration, diol 21 (Figure 6c). Subsequently, 21 can be further oxidized by AlkB to generate triol 10, leading to additional repair product dG. These additional
reaction pathways could explain the improved yield of fully repaired
product, dG, when NaBH4-treated M1dG was incubated
with AlkB.
Discussion
The three exocyclic dG
lesions investigated (i.e., α-OH-PdG,
γ-OH-PdG, and M1dG) are important biomarkers of exposure
to ubiquitous environmental chemicals[5] and
inflammation-induced lipid peroxidation byproducts,[13,14,37] acrolein and MDA. The present study demonstrates
that the exocyclic dG lesions are processed by AlkB by a complex but
chemically understandable biochemical pathway. Among the three lesions
studied in ssDNA, γ-OH-PdG was repaired most efficiently, followed
by M1dG and α-OH-PdG (Table 2 and Table 3A–C). The overall AlkB
efficiency at repairing the lesions was generally lower in dsDNA than
that in ssDNA, as evidenced by the lower amounts of fully repaired
product formed in each case (Table 3A–C).
However, in the one case, when M1dG was opposite T, the
total amount of starting material consumed was higher than in the
incubation of AlkB with M1dG in ssDNA. The base placed
opposite the lesion also influenced the repair reactions. Generally,
when the lesions were placed opposite T, the repair was most efficient,
with C being the opposite base that gave the lowest conversions (Tables 2 and 3A–C). These
observations can be rationalized by the base-flipping mechanism proposed
for AlkB,[76] in which a mispaired base (i.e.,
lesion opposite T) is more likely to splay out into the enzyme active
site to be repaired. By contrast, when the exocyclic dG lesions are
placed opposite C, a “correct base pair” is formed (in
the case of γ-OH-PdG and M1dG, via their open-ring
forms), which hinders base-flipping, effectively hiding the lesion
from AlkB and reducing the repair efficiency. This mechanism is consistent
with our previous study of AlkB activity on N2-dG alkyl lesions,[52] such as m2G,
e2G, and the bulkier N2-furfuryl-dG and N2-tetrahydrofurfuryl-dG, which are good AlkB
substrates in ssDNA but are poorly repaired when placed in dsDNA opposite
dC.[52] Furthermore, the preference of AlkB
for repairing exocyclic dG lesions in ssDNA suggests that transcriptionally
active regions of the genome are likely to be most protected by AlkB
activity, which complements other repair pathways that target exocyclic
dG lesions only in dsDNA contexts (i.e., NER).[23]All three exocyclic dG lesions studied have been
proposed to exist
in equilibrium with open-ring forms.[33,63,64] The trapping of the α-OH-PdG and γ-OH-PdG
with PFBHA (Figure 5) suggests that there is
a low but kinetically useful concentration of the ring-opened aldehyde
form in equilibrium with the closed-ring form. Subsequently, by using
NaBH4 to reduce the aldehydes and trap the open-ring forms
of α-OH-PdG and γ-OH-PdG, the activity of AlkB on the
open-ring forms was also investigated. N2-(3-Hydroxypropyl)-G, the NaBH4-reduced open-ring form
of γ-OH-PdG, was shown to be a good substrate for AlkB repair,
even better than the closed-ring γ-OH-PdG substrate (Figure 6b). The reduced open-ring form of α-OH-PdG,
N1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-G, was not significantly oxidized by AlkB; instead,
the reduced version of the dehydrated α-OH-PdG, 1,N2-propano-dG (structure 15), reacted with
AlkB (Figure 6a).For M1dG,
however, the PFBHA trapping does not necessarily
support the existence of the ring-opened aldehyde form, because the
trapped product can also be formed by a direct reaction of PFBHA amine
at the carbon adjacent to N1 of M1dG.[65,75] Consistent with this argument, M1dG incubation with NaBH4 did not generate a measurable amount of trapped open-ring
forms; the reduction yielded the closed-ring product 18, which was also a good substrates for AlkB, on par with the parent
species M1dG. Taken together, the trapping experiments
demonstrated that AlkB can process both open-ring species (such as
the open-ring of γ-OH-PdG) and closed-ring species (such as
the ones derived from M1dG). However, due to equilibria
between open- and closed-ring forms, the AlkB repair reactions of
exocyclic dG lesions are complex, involving overlapping pathways with
multiple convergence points (Figure 4).Given the complexity of the repair pathways (Figure 4), it is challenging to establish unambiguously which reaction
pathway (i.e., oxidation of open- or closed-ring intermediates) is
predominant. Specifically, is AlkB processing the exocyclic dG lesions
by directly oxidizing the closed-ring forms or is AlkB reacting primarily
with the open-ring forms, essentially simpler N1- and N2-alkyl guanines that are known to be AlkB substrates?
For α-OH-PdG, the data were more consistent with the AlkBoxidation
on the closed-ring form. When this substrate was reduced to the open-ring
form with NaBH4, no corresponding AlkBoxidation intermediate
was detected; the AlkB reaction presumably occurred only with the
reduced dehydrated version of α-OH-PdG (structure 2), which is a closed-ring form (Figure 6a).
A possible explanation for this preference may be that the open-ring
form of α-OH-PdG generated a bulky alkyl group on the N1 position
of guanine, which did not fit in the active site of AlkB, unlike a
smaller N1-methyl-dG substituent, which is repaired by AlkB.[51]For γ-OH-PdG, the data suggest that
both the closed- and
open-ring forms could be substrates for AlkB. We demonstrated that
AlkB more efficiently repaired the reduced, open-ring form of γ-OH-PdG
than the unreduced, closed-ring γ-OH-PdG lesion. This observation
is consistent with previous work, which demonstrated that AlkB can
repair guanines substituted at N2 positions
with alkyl groups of varying sizes, including bulky alkyl substitutents.[52] It is noted, however, that the observed repair
of the open-ring form does not rule out the possibility that AlkB
can additionally oxidize the closed-ring form of γ-OH-PdG (i.e.,
the 5a to 3a step of Figure 4a).The data on the AlkB repair of M1dG lesion
are most
consistent with the formation of an epoxide intermediate (8) of the closed-ring form, which subsequently gets hydrated twice
to form triol 10. Intermediate 10 can also
be obtained from the oxidation and hydration of intermediates 11a or 12a, which are hydrated forms of M1dG. However, the presence of these hydrated forms was not
detectable in the starting material, and their reduced forms were
not observed in the NaBH4 reaction (Figure 6c). Therefore, the alternative pathways involving 11a and 12a are expected to play a minor role, if any,
in the AlkB reaction (Figure 4b). The data
on M1dG repair by AlkB suggest that the enzyme, similar
to its mechanism on εA, primarily acts on the closed-ring form
of the substrate.The AlkB repair data on exocyclic dG lesions
also provided some
insight on the AlkB selectivity between oxidation at N1- or N2-attached carbons, in the context of an exocyclic
propano adduct. By placing the three-carbon exocycle into a published
AlkB structure,[76] it was determined that
the exocycliccarbon atoms adjacent to the N1 and N2 positions are situated at similar distances relative
to the iron center of AlkB (Figure S19).
This suggests that AlkB, in principle, should oxidize an exocyclic
propano adduct equally well at either the N1 or N2 position. However, in the present study, AlkB repaired
the two OH-PdG lesions with very different efficiencies (Table 2), with γ-OH-PdG being repaired more efficiently
than α-OH-PdG. One explanation for the different AlkB reactivity
toward these isomeric lesions may be the propensity to form open-ring
species. The open-ring form of α-OH-PdG shifts the entire alkyl
substituent to the N1 position, which likely cannot be accommodated
in the AlkB active site; by contrast, the open-ring form of γ-OH-PdG
contains the alkyl substituent at N2,
which can swivel away from the protein to potentially reduce steric
clashes. On the basis of these considerations, we speculate that the
most likely reaction course of the fully reduced exocyclicpropano-dG
(16) with AlkB involves oxidations first at the N1 carbon
(γ-position) and subsequently at the N2 carbon (α-position) to generate the fully repaired
dG.Compared with other known exocyclicAlkB substrates, such
as εA
and EA, the acrolein- and MDA-derived dG lesions are repaired less
efficiently under similar conditions.[46,49,50] One possible explanation is that three-carbon bridges
are bulkier than two-carbon bridges and some of them (i.e., α-OH-PdG,
γ-OH-PdG) can form puckered structures that are harder to accommodate
in the active site of the enzyme. Furthermore, the position of a three-carbon
exocycle between N1 and N2 of guanine
could be suboptimal in the AlkB active site compared with the two-carbon
bridge between N6 and N1 of adenine. Finally, AlkB has
been demonstrated to prefer alkylated adenines compared to alkylated
guanines; specifically, N1-methyl-adenine is repaired significantly
more efficiently than N1-methyl-guanine.[51] This difference in reactivity is believed to be due to the fact
that N1-methyl-adenine has a positive charge on N1, whereas N1-methyl-guanine
is a neutral species. Maciejewska et al. proposed that, in general,
the preference of AlkB toward positively charged lesions is likely
due to the presence of negatively charged aspartate residue (Asp-135)
in the active site.[53] Therefore, it is
not surprising that this trend extends to exocyclic alkyl lesions,
where the exocyclicguanines in the present study are repaired less
efficiently by AlkB than exocyclic adenines, in part because they
are neutral species. Furthermore, the higher repair efficiency of
AlkB when acting on positively charged lesions could also be explained
by the propensity of the AlkBoxidation intermediates of such lesions
to decompose and generate the fully repaired base. Consequently, it
is anticipated that AlkBoxidation intermediates with pKa’s of the base nitrogens altered in a direction
that favors protonation would convert more efficiently to the fully
repaired product. However, in the case of the exocyclic dG lesions,
the AlkBoxidation intermediates are generally more abundant than
fully repaired dG, suggesting that the pKa’s of the N1 or N2 nitrogen of
the intermediates are not altered significantly during the AlkB reactions.The present work established the chemical competence of the E. coli dioxygenase AlkB to oxidize and repair acrolein-
and MDA-derived exocyclicguanine lesions, suggesting that one role
of AlkB may be to alleviate the mutagenic and toxic consequences of
reactive aldehydes derived from these primary toxicants. Additionally,
the ability of AlkB to repair the open-ring forms of exocyclicguanine
lesions suggests that AlkB may also modulate the toxicity and mutagenicity
associated with the formation of inter- and intrastrand cross-links[30−33] generated by the open-ring forms of the acrolein- and MDA-derived
exocyclicguanine lesions. Given that AlkB has nine mammalian homologues[77,78] (ABH1–8, FTO), it is anticipated that these repair pathways
may also be operating in mammalian cells; however, the extent to which
these pathways play a role in modulating the mutagenic and carcinogenic
risk associated with exposure to acrolein and inflammation-derived
MDA is not known and remains to be established.
Authors: Manorama Kanuri; Irina G Minko; Lubomir V Nechev; Thomas M Harris; Constance M Harris; R Stephen Lloyd Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-03-11 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Yo-Chan Jeong; Ramiah Sangaiah; Jun Nakamura; Brian F Pachkowski; Asoka Ranasinghe; Avram Gold; Louise M Ball; James A Swenberg Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Laurie A VanderVeen; Alexandra Druckova; James N Riggins; Jennifer L Sorrells; F Peter Guengerich; Lawrence J Marnett Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Lubomir V Nechev; Ivan D Kozekov; Angela K Brock; Carmelo J Rizzo; Thomas M Harris Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Charles G Knutson; Emily H Rubinson; Dapo Akingbade; Carolyn S Anderson; Donald F Stec; Katya V Petrova; Ivan D Kozekov; F Peter Guengerich; Carmelo J Rizzo; Lawrence J Marnett Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Fangyi Chen; Qi Tang; Ke Bian; Zachary T Humulock; Xuedong Yang; Marco Jost; Catherine L Drennan; John M Essigmann; Deyu Li Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Daria Zdżalik; Anna Domańska; Paulina Prorok; Konrad Kosicki; Erwin van den Born; Pål Ø Falnes; Carmelo J Rizzo; F Peter Guengerich; Barbara Tudek Journal: DNA Repair (Amst) Date: 2015-03-05
Authors: Orrette R Wauchope; William N Beavers; James J Galligan; Michelle M Mitchener; Philip J Kingsley; Lawrence J Marnett Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Fangyi Chen; Ke Bian; Qi Tang; Bogdan I Fedeles; Vipender Singh; Zachary T Humulock; John M Essigmann; Deyu Li Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 3.973
Authors: Kurt Housh; Jay S Jha; Tuhin Haldar; Saosan Binth Md Amin; Tanhaul Islam; Amanda Wallace; Anuoluwapo Gomina; Xu Guo; Christopher Nel; Jesse W Wyatt; Kent S Gates Journal: DNA Repair (Amst) Date: 2020-12-24
Authors: Qi Tang; Ang Cai; Ke Bian; Fangyi Chen; James C Delaney; Sravani Adusumalli; Alvin C Bach; Fatemeh Akhlaghi; Bongsup P Cho; Deyu Li Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2017-11-20