Lieveke Ameye1, Caroline Antoine2, Marianne Paesmans1, Evandro de Azambuja3, Serge Rozenberg4. 1. Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet, Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Rue Haute 322, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: caroline_antoine@stpierre-bru.be. 3. Department of Medical Oncology and Breast Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet, Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Rue Haute 322, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The first 'Women's Health Initiative' (WHI) randomised controlled trial assessed use of continuous combined menopausal hormone therapy (cc-MHT). It was prematurely stopped because of an increased invasive breast cancer (BC), coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and pulmonary embolism risk. Consequently, scientific societies recommended use of MHT at the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration. As a result, a sharp decline in MHT use occurred worldwide. AIM: To report in a uniform way the change in MHT use in European countries. To evaluate whether the variability of the MHT changes were related to some medical indicators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IMS Health provided MHT sales data for the years 2002 till 2010 for 17 countries. We tested several hypotheses to explain the heterogeneity of MHT use changes. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In 2002, the estimated MHT rate in women 45-69 years old varied considerably between countries ranging from less than 5% to more than 25%. In all countries a profound decrease occurred between 2002 and 2010, ranging from 50% to 77%. By the end of 2010, the MHT uptake was lower than 10% in all countries except in Finland. MHT use change was not correlated to MHT use and prevailing BC incidence at baseline, nor to the number of gynaecologists per 100,000 women or to the level of information about MHT. CONCLUSION: The global MHT use experienced a sharp decrease in all the analysed countries, although some variability exists. The decrease was unrelated to the assessed parameters.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The first 'Women's Health Initiative' (WHI) randomised controlled trial assessed use of continuous combined menopausal hormone therapy (cc-MHT). It was prematurely stopped because of an increased invasive breast cancer (BC), coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and pulmonary embolism risk. Consequently, scientific societies recommended use of MHT at the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration. As a result, a sharp decline in MHT use occurred worldwide. AIM: To report in a uniform way the change in MHT use in European countries. To evaluate whether the variability of the MHT changes were related to some medical indicators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IMS Health provided MHT sales data for the years 2002 till 2010 for 17 countries. We tested several hypotheses to explain the heterogeneity of MHT use changes. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In 2002, the estimated MHT rate in women 45-69 years old varied considerably between countries ranging from less than 5% to more than 25%. In all countries a profound decrease occurred between 2002 and 2010, ranging from 50% to 77%. By the end of 2010, the MHT uptake was lower than 10% in all countries except in Finland. MHT use change was not correlated to MHT use and prevailing BC incidence at baseline, nor to the number of gynaecologists per 100,000 women or to the level of information about MHT. CONCLUSION: The global MHT use experienced a sharp decrease in all the analysed countries, although some variability exists. The decrease was unrelated to the assessed parameters.
Authors: Rowan T Chlebowski; Thomas E Rohan; JoAnn E Manson; Aaron K Aragaki; Andrew Kaunitz; Marcia L Stefanick; Michael S Simon; Karen C Johnson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Mary J O'Sullivan; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Rami Nassir; Lawrence S Lessin; Ross L Prentice Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Joanne Kotsopoulos; Jacek Gronwald; Beth Y Karlan; Tomasz Huzarski; Nadine Tung; Pal Moller; Susan Armel; Henry T Lynch; Leigha Senter; Andrea Eisen; Christian F Singer; William D Foulkes; Michelle R Jacobson; Ping Sun; Jan Lubinski; Steven A Narod Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Anja Rudolph; Peter A Fasching; Sabine Behrens; Ursula Eilber; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Deborah Thompson; Kamila Czene; Judith S Brand; Jingmei Li; Christopher Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathleen Brandt; Emily Hallberg; Janet E Olson; Adam Lee; Matthias W Beckmann; Arif B Ekici; Lothar Haeberle; Gertraud Maskarinec; Loic Le Marchand; Fredrick Schumacher; Roger L Milne; Julia A Knight; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C Southey; Miroslav K Kapuscinski; John L Hopper; Irene L Andrulis; Graham G Giles; Christopher A Haiman; Kay-Tee Khaw; Robert Luben; Per Hall; Paul D P Pharoah; Fergus J Couch; Douglas F Easton; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Celine Vachon; Jenny Chang-Claude Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2015-08-16 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Ginger D Constantine; Shelli Graham; Cathy Clerinx; Brian A Bernick; Mitchell Krassan; Sebastian Mirkin; Heather Currie Journal: Post Reprod Health Date: 2016-02-18
Authors: Úna McMenamin; Blánaid Hicks; Carmel Hughes; Peter Murchie; Julia Hippisley-Cox; Tom Ranger; Carol Coupland; Chris Cardwell Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Michael E Jones; Minouk J Schoemaker; Lauren Wright; Emily McFadden; James Griffin; Dawn Thomas; Jane Hemming; Karen Wright; Alan Ashworth; Anthony J Swerdlow Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Graeme L Fraser; Samuel Lederman; Arthur Waldbaum; Robin Kroll; Nanette Santoro; Misun Lee; Laurence Skillern; Steven Ramael Journal: Menopause Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.310