Literature DB >> 26181174

Breast Cancer After Use of Estrogen Plus Progestin and Estrogen Alone: Analyses of Data From 2 Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials.

Rowan T Chlebowski1, Thomas E Rohan2, JoAnn E Manson3, Aaron K Aragaki4, Andrew Kaunitz5, Marcia L Stefanick6, Michael S Simon7, Karen C Johnson8, Jean Wactawski-Wende9, Mary J O'Sullivan10, Lucile L Adams-Campbell11, Rami Nassir12, Lawrence S Lessin13, Ross L Prentice4.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) continues in clinical practice, but reports are conflicting concerning the longer-term breast cancer effects of relatively short-term use.
OBJECTIVE: To report the longer-term influence of menopausal HT on breast cancer incidence in the 2 Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized clinical trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 27,347 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years were enrolled at 40 US centers from 1993 to 1998 and followed up for a median of 13 years through September 2010.
INTERVENTIONS: A total of 16,608 women with a uterus were randomized to conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg/d [estrogen]) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg/d [progestin]) (E + P) or placebo with a median intervention duration of 5.6 years, and 10,739 women with prior hysterectomy were randomized to conjugated equine estrogens alone (0.625 mg/d) or placebo with a median intervention duration of 7.2 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time-specific invasive breast cancer incidence rates and exploratory analyses of breast cancer characteristics by intervention and postintervention phases in the 2 HT trials.
RESULTS: In the E + P trial, hazard ratios (HRs) for the influence of combined HT on breast cancer were lower than 1 for 2 years (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47-1.08) and steadily increased throughout intervention, becoming significantly increased for the entire intervention phase (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.53). In the early postintervention phase (within 2.75 years from intervention), there was a sharp decrease in breast cancer incidence in the combined HT group, though the HR remained higher than 1 (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.90-1.70). During the late postintervention phase (requiring patient re-consent), the HR for breast cancer risk remained higher than 1 through 5.5 years (median) of additional follow-up (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.77). In the estrogen alone trial, the HR for invasive breast cancer risk was lower than 1 throughout the intervention phase (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-1.02) and remained lower than 1 in the early postintervention phase (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89), but risk reduction was not observed during the late postintervention follow-up (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.73-1.87). Characteristics of breast cancers diagnosed during early and late postintervention phases differed in both trials. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the E + P trial, the higher breast cancer risk seen during intervention was followed by a substantial drop in risk in the early postintervention phase, but a higher breast cancer risk remained during the late postintervention follow-up. In the estrogen alone trial, the lower breast cancer risk seen during intervention was sustained in the early postintervention phase but was not evident during the late postintervention follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26181174      PMCID: PMC6871651          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  40 in total

1.  Estrogen alone in postmenopausal women and breast cancer detection by means of mammography and breast biopsy.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Garnet Anderson; JoAnn E Manson; Mary Pettinger; Shagufta Yasmeen; Dorothy Lane; Robert D Langer; F Allan Hubbell; Anne McTiernan; Susan Hendrix; Robert Schenken; Marcia L Stefanick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Trends in menopausal hormone therapy use of US office-based physicians, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Sandra A Tsai; Marcia L Stefanick; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1998-02

4.  Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jacques E Rossouw; Garnet L Anderson; Ross L Prentice; Andrea Z LaCroix; Charles Kooperberg; Marcia L Stefanick; Rebecca D Jackson; Shirley A A Beresford; Barbara V Howard; Karen C Johnson; Jane Morley Kotchen; Judith Ockene
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study.

Authors:  Valerie Beral
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  National use of postmenopausal hormone therapy: annual trends and response to recent evidence.

Authors:  Adam L Hersh; Marcia L Stefanick; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States.

Authors:  Peter M Ravdin; Kathleen A Cronin; Nadia Howlader; Christine D Berg; Rowan T Chlebowski; Eric J Feuer; Brenda K Edwards; Donald A Berry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: scientific review.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Linda L Humphrey; Peggy Nygren; Steven M Teutsch; Janet D Allan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women's Health Initiative randomized trials.

Authors:  JoAnn E Manson; Rowan T Chlebowski; Marcia L Stefanick; Aaron K Aragaki; Jacques E Rossouw; Ross L Prentice; Garnet Anderson; Barbara V Howard; Cynthia A Thomson; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Rebecca D Jackson; Marian Limacher; Karen L Margolis; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Shirley A Beresford; Jane A Cauley; Charles B Eaton; Margery Gass; Judith Hsia; Karen C Johnson; Charles Kooperberg; Lewis H Kuller; Cora E Lewis; Simin Liu; Lisa W Martin; Judith K Ockene; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Lynda H Powell; Michael S Simon; Linda Van Horn; Mara Z Vitolins; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Jim Ingle; Alan Coates; John Forbes; Judith Bliss; Marc Buyse; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Marco Colleoni; Charles Coombes; Claire Snowdon; Michael Gnant; Raimund Jakesz; Manfred Kaufmann; Francesco Boccardo; Jon Godwin; Christina Davies; Richard Peto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  The Intestinal Microbiome and Estrogen Receptor-Positive Female Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Claudia S Plottel; Martin J Blaser; Sylvia Adams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The modulation of estrogen-induced apoptosis as an interpretation of the women's health initiative trials.

Authors:  Balkees Abderrahman; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-12-23

3.  The Influence of Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Potential Lifestyle Interactions in Female Cancer Development-a Population-Based Prospective Study.

Authors:  Marianne Holm; Anja Olsen; Cecilie Kyrø; Kim Overvad; Niels Kroman; Anne Tjønneland
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 4.  Long-term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Jane Marjoribanks; Cindy Farquhar; Helen Roberts; Anne Lethaby; Jasmine Lee
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-17

5.  Estrogen alone and health outcomes in black women by African ancestry: a secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Wendy Barrington; Aaron K Aragaki; JoAnn E Manson; Gloria Sarto; Mary J OʼSullivan; Daniel Wu; Jane A Cauley; Lihong Qi; Robert L Wallace; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment.

Authors:  Janet M Gray; Sharima Rasanayagam; Connie Engel; Jeanne Rizzo
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Risk reduction surgery (RRS) for tubo-ovarian cancer in an Irish gynaecological practice: an analysis of indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Claire Thompson; Ciara McCormick; Waseem Kamran; Ciaran O'Riain; Lucy Norris; David Gallagher; Noreen Gleeson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Postmenopausal Female Hormone Use and Estrogen Receptor-Positive and -Negative Breast Cancer in African American Women.

Authors:  Lynn Rosenberg; Traci N Bethea; Emma Viscidi; Chi-Chen Hong; Melissa A Troester; Elisa V Bandera; Christopher A Haiman; Laurence N Kolonel; Andrew F Olshan; Christine B Ambrosone; Julie R Palmer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Rat models of 17β-estradiol-induced mammary cancer reveal novel insights into breast cancer etiology and prevention.

Authors:  James D Shull; Kirsten L Dennison; Aaron C Chack; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  Impact of progesterone on stem/progenitor cells in the human breast.

Authors:  Heidi N Hilton; Christine L Clarke
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.