Literature DB >> 25155642

The performance of contemporary cystatin C-based GFR equations in predicting gentamicin clearance.

Paul K L Chin1, Janice S C Chew-Harris, Christopher M Florkowski, Evan J Begg.   

Abstract

AIMS: We aimed to compare the performances of contemporary cystatin C (Cys)-based GFR equations, and the creatinine only Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for predicting gentamicin clearance.
METHODS: The bias and imprecision of the CKD-EPI, CKD-EPI_Cys and creatinine-cystatin C CKD-EPI (CKD-EPI_CrCys) equations for predicting gentamicin clearances, were assessed in 260 patients treated with gentamicin during 2012-2013. The creatinine-cystatin C Berlin Initiative Study equation (BIS_CrCys) was examined in the ≥70 year subgroup. The reference gentamicin clearance was calculated using post-dose plasma concentrations.
RESULTS: The CKD-EPI_CrCys equation had the highest percentage of estimates within 30% of the reference gentamicin clearance (70%, P = 0.003) and lowest root mean square error (95% CI) of 29 (25, 23) ml min(-1) of the three equations for the entire cohort. There was no significant improvement in the performances of the equations with the exclusion of 41 patients with abnormal thyroid function tests or steroid co-prescription at the time of the index gentamicin dose. Of the remaining 219 patients, adjustment for individual BSA improved the performances of all GFR equations (P ≤ 0.003) in those with body mass indices (BMI) <18.5 or ≥30 kg m(-2) , but not those with BMI 18.5-29.9 kg m(-2) . There was no advantage of the BIS_CrCys over the CKD-EPI_CrCys equation in the ≥70 year subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: The CKD-EPI_CrCys equation provided the best estimate of gentamicin clearance. If used for guiding gentamicin dosing, the results from GFR equations should be adjusted for individual BSA at the extremes of body size.
© 2014 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clearance; cystatin C; gentamicin; glomerular filtration rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25155642      PMCID: PMC4309632          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  43 in total

1.  Poor correlation between body surface area and glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  M J Dooley; S G Poole
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Estimating equations for glomerular filtration rate in the era of creatinine standardization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Earley; Dana Miskulin; Edmund J Lamb; Andrew S Levey; Katrin Uhlig
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Glenn M Chertow; Elisabeth Burdick; Melissa Honour; Joseph V Bonventre; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Drug dosing consideration in patients with acute and chronic kidney disease-a clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).

Authors:  Gary R Matzke; George R Aronoff; Arthur J Atkinson; William M Bennett; Brian S Decker; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Thomas Golper; Darren W Grabe; Bertram Kasiske; Frieder Keller; Jan T Kielstein; Ravindra Mehta; Bruce A Mueller; Deborah A Pasko; Franz Schaefer; Domenic A Sica; Lesley A Inker; Jason G Umans; Patrick Murray
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C.

Authors:  Lesley A Inker; Christopher H Schmid; Hocine Tighiouart; John H Eckfeldt; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Jane Manzi; Frederick Van Lente; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The performances of the Cockcroft-Gault, modification of diet in renal disease study and chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equations in predicting gentamicin clearance.

Authors:  P K L Chin; C M Florkowski; E J Begg
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.057

7.  Biological variation of cystatin C and creatinine.

Authors:  Mark Reinhard; Erland J Erlandsen; Else Randers
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.713

8.  Promoter-mediated, dexamethasone-induced increase in cystatin C production by HeLa cells.

Authors:  M Bjarnadóttir; A Grubb; I Olafsson
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.713

9.  Effect of prednisone on renal function in man.

Authors:  B A van Acker; M F Prummel; J A Weber; W M Wiersinga; L Arisz
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 10.  Cystatin C--properties and use as diagnostic marker.

Authors:  A O Grubb
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.394

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prediction of Vancomycin Levels Using Cystatin C in Overweight and Obese Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study of Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Hilary R Teaford; Ryan W Stevens; Andrew D Rule; Kristin C Mara; Kianoush B Kashani; John C Lieske; John O'Horo; Erin F Barreto
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Estimation of creatinine clearance using plasma creatinine or cystatin C: a secondary analysis of two pharmacokinetic studies in surgical ICU patients.

Authors:  Thomas Steinke; Stefan Moritz; Stefanie Beck; Carsten Gnewuch; Martin G Kees
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.