Literature DB >> 25155294

The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of marginal donors allocated by standardized pretransplant donor biopsy assessment: distribution and association with graft outcomes.

I Gandolfini1, C Buzio, P Zanelli, A Palmisano, E Cremaschi, A Vaglio, G Piotti, L Melfa, G La Manna, G Feliciangeli, M Cappuccilli, M P Scolari, I Capelli, L Panicali, O Baraldi, S Stefoni, A Buscaroli, L Ridolfi, A D'Errico, G Cappelli, D Bonucchi, E Rubbiani, A Albertazzi, A Mehrotra, P Cravedi, U Maggiore.   

Abstract

Pretransplant donor biopsy (PTDB)-based marginal donor allocation systems to single or dual renal transplantation could increase the use of organs with Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) in the highest range (e.g. >80 or >90), whose discard rate approximates 50% in the United States. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively calculated the KDPI and analyzed the outcomes of 442 marginal kidney transplants (340 single transplants: 278 with a PTDB Remuzzi score<4 [median KDPI: 87; interquartile range (IQR): 78-94] and 62 with a score=4 [median KDPI: 87; IQR: 76-93]; 102 dual transplants [median KDPI: 93; IQR: 86-96]) and 248 single standard transplant controls (median KDPI: 36; IQR: 18-51). PTDB-based allocation of marginal grafts led to a limited discard rate of 15% for kidneys with KDPI of 80-90 and of 37% for kidneys with a KDPI of 91-100. Although 1-year estimated GFRs were significantly lower in recipients of marginal kidneys (-9.3, -17.9 and -18.8 mL/min, for dual transplants, single kidneys with PTDB score<4 and =4, respectively; p<0.001), graft survival (median follow-up 3.3 years) was similar between marginal and standard kidney transplants (hazard ratio: 1.20 [95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.79; p=0.38]). In conclusion, PTDB-based allocation allows the safe transplantation of kidneys with KDPI in the highest range that may otherwise be discarded. © Copyright 2014 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; clinical research/practice; donors and donation: extended criteria; kidney (allograft) function/dysfunction; kidney transplantation/nephrology; organ acceptance; organ allocation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25155294      PMCID: PMC4400114          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  28 in total

1.  Expanded criteria donors: process and outcomes.

Authors:  Akinlolu O Ojo
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Banff '05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN').

Authors:  K Solez; R B Colvin; L C Racusen; B Sis; P F Halloran; P E Birk; P M Campbell; M Cascalho; A B Collins; A J Demetris; C B Drachenberg; I W Gibson; P C Grimm; M Haas; E Lerut; H Liapis; R B Mannon; P B Marcus; M Mengel; M J Mihatsch; B J Nankivell; V Nickeleit; J C Papadimitriou; J L Platt; P Randhawa; I Roberts; L Salinas-Madriga; D R Salomon; D Seron; M Sheaff; J J Weening
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Double versus single renal allografts from aged donors.

Authors:  A Andrés; J M Morales; J C Herrero; M Praga; E Morales; E Hernández; T Ortuño; J L Rodício; M A Martínez; G Usera; R Díaz; G Polo; F Aguirre; O Leiva
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Early experience with dual kidney transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. Double Kidney Transplant Group (DKG).

Authors:  G Remuzzi; J Grinyò; P Ruggenenti; M Beatini; E H Cole; E L Milford; B M Brenner
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Dual kidneys from marginal adult donors as a source for cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Suphamai Bunnapradist; H Albin Gritsch; Alice Peng; Stanley C Jordan; Yong W Cho
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Dual-kidney transplantation with organs from expanded criteria donors: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Jane C Tan; Edward J Alfrey; Donald C Dafoe; Maria T Millan; John D Scandling
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Outcomes of dual adult kidney transplants in the United States: an analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database.

Authors:  Jagbir Gill; Yong W Cho; Gabriel M Danovitch; Alan Wilkinson; Gerald Lipshutz; Phuong-Thu Pham; John S Gill; Tariq Shah; Suphamai Bunnapradist
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Strategies for compensating for the declining numbers of cadaver donor kidney transplants.

Authors:  Daniel Palmes; Heiner Hubert Wolters; Jens Brockmann; Norbert Senninger; Hans-Ullrich Spiegel; Karl-Heinz Dietl
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.992

View more
  35 in total

1.  Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States.

Authors:  Sumit Mohan; Mariana C Chiles; Rachel E Patzer; Stephen O Pastan; S Ali Husain; Dustin J Carpenter; Geoffrey K Dube; R John Crew; Lloyd E Ratner; David J Cohen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 2.  Kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD): state of the art.

Authors:  Dominic M Summers; Christopher J E Watson; Gavin J Pettigrew; Rachel J Johnson; David Collett; James M Neuberger; J Andrew Bradley
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 3.  Perspective on Clinical Application of Biomarkers in AKI.

Authors:  Chirag R Parikh; Sherry G Mansour
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Strategies for an Expanded Use of Kidneys From Elderly Donors.

Authors:  María José Pérez-Sáez; Núria Montero; Dolores Redondo-Pachón; Marta Crespo; Julio Pascual
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Histopathologic Findings on Implantation Renal Allograft Biopsies Correlate With Kidney Donor Profile Index and 30-Day Serum Creatinine.

Authors:  L-X Chen; L C Francalacci; H Bang; A De Mattos; R V Perez; K-Y Jen
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Long-Term Outcomes and Discard Rate of Kidneys by Decade of Extended Criteria Donor Age.

Authors:  Maria Messina; Davide Diena; Sergio Dellepiane; Gabriella Guzzo; Luca Lo Sardo; Fabrizio Fop; Giuseppe P Segoloni; Antonio Amoroso; Paola Magistroni; Luigi Biancone
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Survival Benefit of Transplantation with a Deceased Diabetic Donor Kidney Compared with Remaining on the Waitlist.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen; Kevin C Eddinger; Jayme E Locke; Kimberly A Forde; Peter P Reese; Deirdre L Sawinski
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Reevaluation of the Kidney Donor Risk Index.

Authors:  Yingchao Zhong; Douglas E Schaubel; John D Kalbfleisch; Valarie B Ashby; Panduranga S Rao; Randall S Sung
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Utility of Applying Quality Assessment Tools for Kidneys With KDPI ≥80.

Authors:  Mona D Doshi; Peter P Reese; Isaac E Hall; Bernd Schröppel; Joseph Ficek; Richard N Formica; Francis L Weng; Rick D Hasz; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Changes in Discard Rate After the Introduction of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI).

Authors:  S Bae; A B Massie; X Luo; S Anjum; N M Desai; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.