INTRODUCTION: In this study we sought to determine the cross-sectional area (CSA) of peripheral nerves in patients with distinct subtypes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: Ulnar and median nerve ultrasound was performed in 78 ALS patients [classic, n = 21; upper motor neuron dominant (UMND), n = 14; lower motor neuron dominant (LMND), n = 20; bulbar, n = 15; primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), n = 8] and 18 matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Compared with controls, ALS patients had significant, distally pronounced reductions of ulnar CSA (forearm/wrist level) across all disease groups, except for PLS. Median nerve CSA (forearm/wrist level) did not differ between controls and ALS. CONCLUSION: Ulnar nerve ultrasound in ALS subgroups revealed significant differences in distal CSA values, which suggests it has value as a marker of LMN involvement. Its potential was particularly evident in the UMND and PLS groups, which can be hard to separate clinically, yet their accurate separation has major prognostic implications.
INTRODUCTION: In this study we sought to determine the cross-sectional area (CSA) of peripheral nerves in patients with distinct subtypes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: Ulnar and median nerve ultrasound was performed in 78 ALSpatients [classic, n = 21; upper motor neuron dominant (UMND), n = 14; lower motor neuron dominant (LMND), n = 20; bulbar, n = 15; primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), n = 8] and 18 matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Compared with controls, ALSpatients had significant, distally pronounced reductions of ulnar CSA (forearm/wrist level) across all disease groups, except for PLS. Median nerve CSA (forearm/wrist level) did not differ between controls and ALS. CONCLUSION: Ulnar nerve ultrasound in ALS subgroups revealed significant differences in distal CSA values, which suggests it has value as a marker of LMN involvement. Its potential was particularly evident in the UMND and PLS groups, which can be hard to separate clinically, yet their accurate separation has major prognostic implications.
Authors: Kai F Loewenbrück; Julia Liesenberg; Markus Dittrich; Jochen Schäfer; Beate Patzner; Beate Trausch; Jochen Machetanz; Andreas Hermann; Alexander Storch Journal: J Neurol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: José Ríos-Díaz; María Elena Del Baño-Aledo; José I Tembl-Ferrairó; Maria J Chumillas; Juan F Vázquez-Costa; Jacinto J Martínez-Payá Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: C E McIlduff; M G Martucci; C Shin; K Qi; A K Pacheck; H Gutierrez; M Mortreux; S B Rutkove Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 3.708