Literature DB >> 2515277

Transient, steady-state and rebreathing responses to carbon dioxide in man, at rest and during light exercise.

M S Jacobi1, C P Patil, K B Saunders.   

Abstract

1. The transient ventilatory response to CO2, measured using short pulses at constant inflow, was compared with the steady-state response at rest and during exercise at 50 W, and with the rebreathing response at rest, in nine healthy subjects. At rest CO2 was given at flow rates of 0.2 and 0.4 l min-1 and during exercise, to compensate for the smaller inhaled CO2 fraction as ventilation increased, at flow rates of 0.4 and 0.8 l min-1. 2. We calculated two indexes of gain for the transient response: the ratio of the peaks of the ventilation and PCO2 pulses, and the ratio of their integrals. 3. The steady-state response was greater than the transient response at rest and during exercise, but there was no correlation between the two. The rebreathing response was greater than both. Both the transient and the steady-state responses were greater during exercise than at rest. 4. To assess alinearity, the steady-state responses to the two CO2 flow rates were compared. At rest, there was no significant difference. During exercise, the response was greater to 0.4 than 0.8 l min-1, indicating alinearity concave downwards. 5. We conclude that the transient response as we calculate it is not representative of steady-state gain, and that the CO2 response in light exercise is steeper, and concave downwards in shape. The rebreathing technique overestimates CO2 sensitivity near the control point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2515277      PMCID: PMC1190513          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  13 in total

1.  Ventilatory sensitivity to inhaled carbon dioxide around the control point during exercise.

Authors:  A R Cummin; J Alison; M S Jacobi; V I Iyawe; K B Saunders
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.124

2.  A comparison of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide by steady-state and rebreathing methods during metabolic acidosis and alkalosis.

Authors:  R A Linton; P A Poole-Wilson; R J Davies; I R Cameron
Journal:  Clin Sci Mol Med       Date:  1973-08

3.  Ventilatory responses to transient hypoxia and hypercapnia in man.

Authors:  N H Edelman; P E Epstein; S Lahiri; N S Cherniack
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  1973-04

4.  Transient ventilatory response to graded hypercapnia in man.

Authors:  W J Reynolds; H T Milhorn; G H Holloman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  The ventilatory response to CO2 in chronic airways obstruction measured by a rebreathing method.

Authors:  T J Clark
Journal:  Clin Sci       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 6.124

6.  Blood-brain tissue Pco2 relationships and ventilation during rebreathing.

Authors:  D J Read; J Leigh
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Ventilatory responses to inhaled carbon dioxide at rest and during exercise in man.

Authors:  M S Jacobi; V I Iyawe; C P Patil; A R Cummin; K B Saunders
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 6.124

8.  A clinical method for assessing the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide.

Authors:  D J Read
Journal:  Australas Ann Med       Date:  1967-02

9.  Computerized determination of pneumotachometer characteristics using a calibrated syringe.

Authors:  M P Yeh; R M Gardner; T D Adams; F G Yanowitz
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1982-07

10.  Comparison of chemoreflex gains obtained with two different methods in cats.

Authors:  J DeGoede; A Berkenbosch; D S Ward; J W Bellville; C N Olievier
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1985-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  On a pseudo-rebreathing technique to assess the ventilatory sensitivity to carbon dioxide in man.

Authors:  A Dahan; A Berkenbosch; J DeGoede; I C Olievier; J G Bovill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.182

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.