Literature DB >> 2515178

Strain differences in susceptibility to 2-acetylaminofluorene and phenobarbital promotion of rat hepatocarcinogenesis in a medium-term assay system: quantitation of glutathione S-transferase P-positive foci development.

M Asamoto1, H Tsuda, M Kagawa, J L de Camargo, N Ito, S Nagase.   

Abstract

Strain differences in susceptibility to promotion by the liver carcinogens 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF) and phenobarbital (PB) were examined in the medium-term bioassay system initially developed in our laboratory using male F344 rats as the test animal and glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P)-positive foci as the lesion end-point. Numbers and areas per cm2 of induced GST-P-positive hepatocellular foci were compared in LEW, F344, NAR, SD, WBN, SHR, Wistar and ODS rats initiated with diethylnitrosamine (DEN) and subjected to partial hepatectomy during subsequent administration of 2-AAF or PB. LEW, SD, WBN, and F344 rats were most susceptible to hepatopromotion by both compounds, with a hundred fold increase in lesion area being observed for 2-AAF in the LEW case. NAR and SHR strains demonstrated an intermediate response, while Wistar and, in particular, the related ODS rats demonstrated very low susceptibilities. The obvious strain differences could be expressed in terms of comparative indices of promoting effects of 2-AAF and PB as well as DEN itself regarding each of the 8 strains tested. The use of F344 rats for the bioassay model was validated by the relatively high sensitivity to both DEN and 2-AAF initiation as well as second-stage promotion stimulus exhibited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2515178      PMCID: PMC5917889          DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb01630.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res        ISSN: 0910-5050


2‐acetylaminofluorene diethylnitrosamine phenobarbital glutathione S‐trans‐ferase placental form partial hepatectomy
  35 in total

1.  Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.

Authors:  S M Hsu; L Raine; H Fanger
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test.

Authors:  B N Ames; J Mccann; E Yamasaki
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Morphological transformation of early passage golden Syrian hamster embryo cells derived from cryopreserved primary cultures as a reliable in vitro bioassay for identifying diverse carcinogens.

Authors:  R J Pienta; J A Poiley; W B Lebherz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1977-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Relative merits of immunohistochemical demonstrations of placental, A, B and C forms of glutathione S-transferase and histochemical demonstration of gamma-glutamyl transferase as markers of altered foci during liver carcinogenesis in rats.

Authors:  M Tatematsu; Y Mera; N Ito; K Satoh; K Sato
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Albumin-deficient rat mutant.

Authors:  S Nagase; K Shimamune; S Shumiya
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A method to quantitate the relative initiating and promoting potencies of hepatocarcinogenic agents in their dose-response relationships to altered hepatic foci.

Authors:  H C Pitot; T L Goldsworthy; S Moran; W Kennan; H P Glauert; R R Maronpot; H A Campbell
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Low susceptibility of analbuminemic rats to induction of bladder cancer by N-[4-(5-nitro-2-furyl)-2-thiazolyl]formamide.

Authors:  Y Hosaka; M Muramatsu; T Matsushima; T Niijima; S Nagase
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1985-07

8.  Strain and sex differences in N-nitrosohexamethyleneimine carcinogenesis in NZB, NZC, NZO, and NZY mice.

Authors:  C M Goodall; W Lijinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  High susceptibility of analbuminaemic rats to induced bladder cancer.

Authors:  T Kakizoe; H Komatsu; Y Honma; T Niijima; T Kawachi; T Sugimura; S Nagase
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Selection pressure and altered hepatocellular islands after a single injection of aflatoxin B1.

Authors:  M A Moore; K Nakagawa; T Ishikawa
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1988-02
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Interplay of estrogen receptors and FOXA factors in the liver cancer.

Authors:  Yongbing Zhao; Zhaoyu Li
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.102

2.  Metalloproteinases 2 and 9 activity during promotion and progression stages of rat liver carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Kelly Silva Furtado; Paulo Wagner Pires; Luis Antonio Justulin; Maria Aparecida Marchesan Rodrigues; Sergio Luis Felisbino; Luis Fernando Barbisan
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.611

3.  Strain differences in sensitivity to the promoting effect of sodium L-ascorbate in a two-stage rat urinary bladder carcinogenesis model.

Authors:  T Murai; S Mori; M Hosono; A Takashima; S Machino; T Oohara; H Yamashita; S Makino; T Matsuda; H Wanibuchi; S Fukushima
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1997-03

4.  Strain differences in susceptibility to 2-acetylaminofluorene and phenobarbital promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis: immunohistochemical analysis of cytochrome P-450 isozyme induction by 2-acetylaminofluorene and phenobarbital.

Authors:  M Asamoto; H Tsuda; T Kato; N Ito; T Masuko; Y Hashimoto; S Nagase
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1989-11

5.  Quantitative comparison of initiation and mutation phenotypes in hepatocytes of the analbuminemic rat.

Authors:  Y P Dragan; C Laufer; A J Koleske; N Drinkwater; H C Pitot
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1993-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.