Literature DB >> 25151538

Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT.

Sabrina T Heijkoop1, Thomas R Langerak2, Sandra Quint2, Luiza Bondar2, Jan Willem M Mens2, Ben J M Heijmen2, Mischa S Hoogeman2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid target motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Each of the 64 patients had four markers implanted in the vaginal fornix to verify the position of the cervix during treatment. Full and empty bladder computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired prior to treatment to build a bladder volume-dependent cervix-uterus motion model for establishment of the plan library. In the first phase of clinical implementation, the library consisted of one IMRT plan based on a single model-predicted internal target volume (mpITV), covering the target for the whole pretreatment observed bladder volume range, and a 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) motion-robust backup plan based on the same mpITV. The planning target volume (PTV) combined the ITV and nodal clinical target volume (CTV), expanded with a 1-cm margin. In the second phase, for patients showing >2.5-cm bladder-induced cervix-uterus motion during planning, two IMRT plans were constructed, based on mpITVs for empty-to-half-full and half-full-to-full bladder. In both phases, a daily cone beam CT (CBCT) scan was acquired to first position the patient based on bony anatomy and nodal targets and then select the appropriate plan. Daily post-treatment CBCT was used to verify plan selection.
RESULTS: Twenty-four and 40 patients were included in the first and second phase, respectively. In the second phase, 11 patients had two IMRT plans. Overall, an IMRT plan was used in 82.4% of fractions. The main reasons for selecting the motion-robust backup plan were uterus outside the PTV (27.5%) and markers outside their margin (21.3%). In patients with two IMRT plans, the half-full-to-full bladder plan was selected on average in 45% of the first 12 fractions, which was reduced to 35% in the last treatment fractions.
CONCLUSIONS: The implemented online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for locally advanced cervical cancer enables (almost) daily tissue-sparing IMRT.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151538     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  28 in total

Review 1.  Problems and solutions in IGRT for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Iván Ríos; Ilse Vásquez; Elsa Cuervo; Óscar Garzón; Johnny Burbano
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-05-26

Review 2.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The Stacked-Ellipse Algorithm: An Ultrasound-Based 3-D Uterine Segmentation Tool for Enabling Adaptive Radiotherapy for Uterine Cervix Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah A Mason; Ingrid M White; Susan Lalondrelle; Jeffrey C Bamber; Emma J Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Variability in clinical target volume delineation for intensity modulated radiation therapy in 3 challenging cervix cancer scenarios.

Authors:  Karen Lim; Beth Erickson; Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; David Gaffney; Carien L Creutzberg; Akila Viswanathan; Lorraine Portelance; Sushil Beriwal; Aaron Wolfson; Walter Bosch; Jennifer De Los Santos; Catheryn Yashar; Anuja Jhingran; Mahesh Varia; Issam El Naqa; Bronwyn King; Anthony Fyles
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-02

5.  Practical Clinical Workflows for Online and Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Olga L Green; Lauren E Henke; Geoffrey D Hugo
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.934

6.  Early morbidity and dose-volume effects in definitive radiochemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective cohort study covering modern treatment techniques.

Authors:  Yvette Seppenwoolde; Katarina Majercakova; Martin Buschmann; Elke Dörr; Alina E Sturdza; Maximilian P Schmid; Richard Pötter; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Take Action Protocol: A radiation therapist led approach to act on anatomical changes seen on CBCT.

Authors:  Monica Buijs; Floris Pos; Marloes Frantzen-Steneker; Maddalena Rossi; Peter Remeijer; Folkert Koetsveld
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 8.  Image-guided radiotherapy and -brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Suresh Dutta; Nam Phong Nguyen; Jacqueline Vock; Christine Kerr; Juan Godinez; Satya Bose; Siyoung Jang; Alexander Chi; Fabio Almeida; William Woods; Anand Desai; Rick David; Ulf Lennart Karlsson; Gabor Altdorfer
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Short-course PET based simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Marius Røthe Arnesen; Bernt Louni Rekstad; Caroline Stokke; Kjersti Bruheim; Ayca Muftuler Løndalen; Taran Paulsen Hellebust; Eirik Malinen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) Strategies and Technical Considerations: A State of the ART Review From NRG Oncology.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Percy Lee; Adam D Yock; Jeffrey R Olsen; Minsong Cao; Farzan Siddiqui; William Parker; Anthony Doemer; Yi Rong; Amar U Kishan; Stanley H Benedict; X Allen Li; Beth A Erickson; Jason W Sohn; Ying Xiao; Evan Wuthrick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.