| Literature DB >> 25150839 |
Charles Wang1, Binsheng Gong2, Pierre R Bushel3, Jean Thierry-Mieg4, Danielle Thierry-Mieg4, Joshua Xu5, Hong Fang6, Huixiao Hong5, Jie Shen5, Zhenqiang Su5, Joe Meehan5, Xiaojin Li7, Lu Yang7, Haiqing Li7, Paweł P Łabaj8, David P Kreil9, Dalila Megherbi10, Stan Gaj11, Florian Caiment11, Joost van Delft11, Jos Kleinjans11, Andreas Scherer12, Viswanath Devanarayan13, Jian Wang14, Yong Yang14, Hui-Rong Qian14, Lee J Lancashire15, Marina Bessarabova15, Yuri Nikolsky16, Cesare Furlanello17, Marco Chierici17, Davide Albanese18, Giuseppe Jurman17, Samantha Riccadonna18, Michele Filosi17, Roberto Visintainer17, Ke K Zhang19, Jianying Li20, Jui-Hua Hsieh21, Daniel L Svoboda22, James C Fuscoe23, Youping Deng24, Leming Shi25, Richard S Paules26, Scott S Auerbach21, Weida Tong5.
Abstract
The concordance of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) with microarrays for genome-wide analysis of differential gene expression has not been rigorously assessed using a range of chemical treatment conditions. Here we use a comprehensive study design to generate Illumina RNA-seq and Affymetrix microarray data from the same liver samples of rats exposed in triplicate to varying degrees of perturbation by 27 chemicals representing multiple modes of action (MOAs). The cross-platform concordance in terms of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) or enriched pathways is linearly correlated with treatment effect size (R(2)0.8). Furthermore, the concordance is also affected by transcript abundance and biological complexity of the MOA. RNA-seq outperforms microarray (93% versus 75%) in DEG verification as assessed by quantitative PCR, with the gain mainly due to its improved accuracy for low-abundance transcripts. Nonetheless, classifiers to predict MOAs perform similarly when developed using data from either platform. Therefore, the endpoint studied and its biological complexity, transcript abundance and the genomic application are important factors in transcriptomic research and for clinical and regulatory decision making.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25150839 PMCID: PMC4243706 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Biotechnol ISSN: 1087-0156 Impact factor: 54.908