Literature DB >> 25150067

Selective attention and pigeons' multiple necessary cues discrimination learning.

Y Teng1, O V Vyazovska2, E A Wasserman3.   

Abstract

We deployed the Multiple Necessary Cues (MNC) discrimination task to see if pigeons can simultaneously attend to four different dimensions of complex visual stimuli. Specifically, we trained eight pigeons on a simultaneous discrimination to peck only 1 of 16 compound stimuli created from all possible combinations of two stimulus values from four separable visual dimensions: shape (circle/square), size (large/small), line orientation (horizontal/vertical), and brightness (dark/light). Some pigeons had CLHD (circle, large, horizontal, dark) as the positive stimulus (S+), whereas others had SSVL (square, small, vertical, light) as the S+. All eight pigeons acquired the MNC discrimination, suggesting that they had attended to all four dimensions. Learning rate was similar to all four dimensions, with learning along the orientation dimension being a bit faster than along the other three dimensions. The more dimensions along which the S-s differed from the S+, the faster was learning, suggesting an added benefit from increasing perceptual disparities between the S-s and the S+. Of particular note, evidence of attentional tradeoffs among the four dimensions was much weaker with the simultaneous task than with the successive task. We consider several reasons for this empirical disparity.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attentional tradeoff; Dimensional stimulus control; Discrimination learning; Pigeon; Selective attention; Touchscreen pecking; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150067     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  6 in total

1.  Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; F Gregory Ashby; J David Smith; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.

Authors:  Victor M Navarro; Ridhi Jani; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.478

3.  Assessing Attention in Category Learning by Animals.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Leyre Castro
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20

Review 4.  Primate cognition: attention, episodic memory, prospective memory, self-control, and metacognition as examples of cognitive control in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Charles R Menzel; Audrey E Parrish; Bonnie M Perdue; Ken Sayers; J David Smith; David A Washburn
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-10

5.  Pigeons and the Ambiguous-Cue Problem: A Riddle that Remains Unsolved.

Authors:  Óscar García-Leal; Carlos Esparza; Laurent Ávila Chauvet; Héctor O Camarena-Pérez; Zirahuén Vílchez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-08

6.  Lateralization in feeding is food type specific and impacts feeding success in wild birds.

Authors:  Karina Karenina; Andrey Giljov
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.