Literature DB >> 2514829

Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees.

C Gilbert1, K W Fulford, C Parker.   

Abstract

A survey of ethics committees in district health authorities was carried out to find out the size and make up of committees and what information and guidance they offered to scientists who apply to do research. A sample (n = 28) of committees in England (n = 190), half from teaching districts and half from non-teaching districts, was contacted by post requesting this information. A high degree of diversity was found, not only in the methods that committees used but also in the ethical criteria each considered to be pertinent for research. It was also shown that published guidelines have made little impact. It is suggested that issuing more guidelines will be of limited use. Rather, the following are needed: information about why guidelines have been widely ignored, better communication between committees, some form of education for committee members, and a formal register of committees compiled.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2514829      PMCID: PMC1838281          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6713.1437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  3 in total

1.  Ethics committees for clinical research. Experience in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  F O Wells; J P Griffin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Compensation and drug trials.

Authors:  A L Diamond; D R Laurence
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-09-03

3.  Research ethical committees in Scotland.

Authors:  I E Thompson; K French; K M Melia; K M Boyd; A A Templeton; B Potter
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-02-28
  3 in total
  19 in total

1.  Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.

Authors:  R Dal-Ré; J Espada; R Ortega
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Responses by four Local Research Ethics Committees to submitted proposals.

Authors:  G Kent
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.

Authors:  G Kent
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.

Authors:  E Cave; S Holm
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  The role of local research ethics committees.

Authors:  P Moodie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-02

Review 6.  Monitoring research ethical committees.

Authors:  S Lock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-01-13

7.  Too many ethical committees.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-19

8.  Research ethics.

Authors:  C G Foster
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Local research ethics committees.

Authors:  K G Alberti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-09

10.  Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experience.

Authors:  C Middle; A Johnson; T Petty; L Sims; A Macfarlane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.