Literature DB >> 25148129

The Development of a Novel Measure to Assess Motives for Compensatory Eating in Response to Exercise: The CEMQ.

Samantha J Moshier1, Aaron J Landau1, Bridget A Hearon1, Aliza T Stein1, Lee Greathouse1, Jasper A J Smits2, Michael W Otto1.   

Abstract

Compensatory eating in response to exercise may be an obstacle to achieving weight-loss and fitness goals. In this study we develop and conduct a preliminary examination of the psychometric properties of the Compensatory Eating Motives Questionnaire (CEMQ), a self-report questionnaire of motives for compensatory eating. Development and testing of the CEMQ was conducted in two student samples. Of respondents, 75% reported engaging in compensatory eating. Factor analysis yielded factors representing three domains of motives for compensatory eating: Eating for Reward, Eating for Recovery, and Eating for Relief. Internal consistency of the factors was adequate, and the factor structure was replicated. Correlations between the CEMQ subscales and trait questionnaires supported hypotheses for convergent and divergent validity. These results encourage further investigation of compensatory eating as a potential obstacle to weight loss, and support the continued assessment of the CEMQ as a tool to measure three conceptually distinct motives for compensatory eating.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compensatory eating; eating; exercise; motivation; motives

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25148129     DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2014.955077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Med        ISSN: 0896-4289            Impact factor:   3.104


  8 in total

1.  The new TV dinner: effects of television programming content on eating and attitudes towards exercise.

Authors:  Kristin L Szuhany; Michael W Otto
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Does Motivation for Exercise Influence Post-Exercise Snacking Behavior?

Authors:  James A Dimmock; Kym J Guelfi; Jessica S West; Tasmiah Masih; Ben Jackson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Testing the Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an 8-Week Exercise and Compensatory Eating Intervention.

Authors:  Jessica S West; Kym J Guelfi; James A Dimmock; Ben Jackson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Exploring human trainability: Design and rationale of Studies of Twin Responses to Understand Exercise as a Therapy (STRUETH) study.

Authors:  Channa E Marsh; Hannah J Thomas; Louise H Naylor; Katrina J Scurrah; Daniel J Green
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-06-09

5.  Preliminary Validation of the Exercise-Snacking Licensing Scale: Rewarding Exercise with Unhealthy Snack Foods and Drinks.

Authors:  Jessica S West; Kym J Guelfi; James A Dimmock; Ben Jackson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Exercise Shifts Hypothetical Food Choices toward Greater Amounts and More Immediate Consumption.

Authors:  Karsten Koehler; Safiya E Beckford; Elise Thayer; Alexandra R Martin; Julie B Boron; Jeffrey R Stevens
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Attenuation of Post-Exercise Energy Intake Following 12 Weeks of Sprint Interval Training in Men and Women with Overweight.

Authors:  Natalya J Beer; Ben Jackson; James A Dimmock; Kym J Guelfi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Development of a scale to measure reasons for eating less healthily after exercise: the compensatory unhealthy eating scale.

Authors:  Natalie M Reily; Lenny R Vartanian; Kate Faasse
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2020-02-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.