| Literature DB >> 25148034 |
Piotr Sorokowski1, Krzysztof Kościński2, Agnieszka Sorokowska3, Tomas Huanca4.
Abstract
The issue of cultural universality of waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) attractiveness in women is currently under debate. We tested men's preferences for female WHR in traditional society of Tsimane'(Native Amazonians) of the Bolivian rainforest (N = 66). Previous studies showed preferences for high WHR in traditional populations, but they did not control for the women's body mass.We used a method of stimulus creation that enabled us to overcome this problem. We found that WHR lower than the average WHR in the population is preferred independent of cultural conditions. Our participants preferred the silhouettes of low WHR, but high body mass index (BMI), which might suggest that previous results could be an artifact related to employed stimuli. We found also that preferences for female BMI are changeable and depend on environmental conditions and probably acculturation (distance from the city). Interestingly, the Tsimane' men did not associate female WHR with age, health, physical strength or fertility. This suggests that men do not have to be aware of the benefits associated with certain body proportions - an issue that requires further investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25148034 PMCID: PMC4141791 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Anthropometric data for 180 non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding Tsimane' women at age 18-30.
|
| (min–max) | |
| Height (cm) | 151.17 (4.71) | (138.1–165.3) |
| Weight (kg) | 52.06 (6.03) | (38.4–77.0) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.76 (2.24) | (18.26–31.16) |
| WHR | 0.874 (0.058) | (0.609–1.043) |
Figure 1Experimental stimuli consisting of nine female silhouettes of 3 levels of BMI and WHR.
Descriptive statistics of participants (n = 66).
|
| (min–max) | |
| Age (years) | 33.67 (11.20) | (18.00–50.00) |
| Height (cm) | 166.40 (5.63) | (151.30–180.00) |
| Weight (kg) | 64.27 (6.89) | (46.80–82.70) |
| BMI (kg/m | 23.21 (2.20) | (16.82–29.37) |
| Body fat (%) | 16.56 (5.56) | (8.00–36.00) |
| Arm girth, relaxed (cm) | 28.06 (1.97) | (24.00–33.00) |
| Arm girth, tense (cm) | 30.94 (1.83) | (26.10–35.00) |
| Wealth (arbitrary unit) | 973.51 (410.56) | (156.25–1837.50) |
| Fasting period (hours) | 4.98 (3.43) | (0.00–16.00) |
| TV watching (hours/week) | 4.02 (7.58) | (0.00–28.00) |
Data before log-transformation.
Data after winsorizing the outlying value.
Frequencies of BMI and WHR levels in silhouettes chosen as the most attractive, youngest, healthiest, strongest, and of the highest fertility.
| Attractiveness | Youthfulness | Health | Strength | Fertility | |
| BMI level | |||||
| 1–low | 17 | 42 | 8 | 8 | 17 |
| 2–average | 11 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 24 |
| 3–high | 38 | 13 | 38 | 37 | 25 |
| WHR level | |||||
| 1–low | 33 | 25 | 21 | 25 | 24 |
| 2–average | 18 | 17 | 27 | 19 | 20 |
| 3–high | 15 | 24 | 18 | 22 | 22 |
Figure 2Age (A), distance from city (B), and fasting period (C) of men who chose low, average, and high BMI or WHR as the most attractive.