Literature DB >> 25148010

Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging grading and pathological grading in meningioma.

Bon-Jour Lin1, Kuan-Nein Chou, Hung-Wen Kao, Chin Lin, Wen-Chiuan Tsai, Shao-Wei Feng, Meei-Shyuan Lee, Dueng-Yuan Hueng.   

Abstract

OBJECT: This study investigated the specific preoperative MRI features of patients with intracranial meningiomas that correlate with pathological grade and provide appropriate preoperative planning.
METHODS: From 2006 to 2012, 120 patients (36 men and 84 women, age range 20-89 years) with newly diagnosed symptomatic intracranial meningiomas undergoing resection were retrospectively analyzed in terms of radiological features of preoperative MRI. There were 90 WHO Grade I and 30 WHO Grade II or III meningiomas. The relationships between MRI features and WHO histopathological grade were analyzed and scored quantitatively.
RESULTS: According to the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, age ≥ 75 years, indistinct tumorbrain interface, positive capsular enhancement, and heterogeneous tumor enhancement were identified factors in the prediction of advanced histopathological grade. The prediction model was quantified as a scoring scale: 2 × (age) + 5 × (tumor-brain interface) + 3 × (capsular enhancement) + 2 × (tumor enhancement). The calculated score correlated positively with the probability of high-grade meningioma.
CONCLUSIONS: This scoring approach may be useful for clinicians in determining therapeutic strategy and in surgical planning for patients with intracranial meningiomas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient; DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; FLAIR = fluidattenuated inversion recovery; OR = odds ratio; WHO grade; histopathological; magnetic resonance imaging; meningioma; oncology; radiological prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25148010     DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  39 in total

1.  Grading meningiomas utilizing multiparametric MRI with inclusion of susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Shun Zhang; Gloria Chia-Yi Chiang; Jacquelyn Marion Knapp; Christina M Zecca; Diana He; Rohan Ramakrishna; Rajiv S Magge; David J Pisapia; Howard Alan Fine; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Yize Zhao; Linda A Heier; Yi Wang; Ilhami Kovanlikaya
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.447

2.  The diagnostic value of using combined MR diffusion tensor imaging parameters to differentiate between low- and high-grade meningioma.

Authors:  Kerim Aslan; Hediye Pinar Gunbey; Leman Tomak; Lutfi Incesu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Can amide proton transfer-weighted imaging differentiate tumor grade and predict Ki-67 proliferation status of meningioma?

Authors:  Hao Yu; Xinrui Wen; Pingping Wu; Yueqin Chen; Tianyu Zou; Xianlong Wang; Shanshan Jiang; Jinyuan Zhou; Zhibo Wen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Diagnostic challenges in meningioma.

Authors:  Martha Nowosielski; Norbert Galldiks; Sarah Iglseder; Philipp Kickingereder; Andreas von Deimling; Martin Bendszus; Wolfgang Wick; Felix Sahm
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Diffusion Profiling via a Histogram Approach Distinguishes Low-grade from High-grade Meningiomas, Can Reflect the Respective Proliferative Potential and Progesterone Receptor Status.

Authors:  Georg Alexander Gihr; Diana Horvath-Rizea; Nikita Garnov; Patricia Kohlhof-Meinecke; Oliver Ganslandt; Hans Henkes; Hans Jonas Meyer; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Alexey Surov; Stefan Schob
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Clinical features, radiological findings, and treatment outcomes of high-grade lateral ventricular meningiomas: a report of 26 cases.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Liang Lv; Jiuhong Li; Weichao Ma; Cheng Chen; Peizhi Zhou; Shu Jiang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Imaging and diagnostic advances for intracranial meningiomas.

Authors:  Raymond Y Huang; Wenya Linda Bi; Brent Griffith; Timothy J Kaufmann; Christian la Fougère; Nils Ole Schmidt; Jöerg C Tonn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth Aldape; Farshad Nassiri; Gelareh Zadeh; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Stereotactic LINAC radiosurgery for the treatment of typical intracranial meningiomas. Efficacy and safety after a follow-up of over 12 years.

Authors:  Mustafa El-Khatib; Faycal El Majdoub; Stefan Hunsche; Mauritius Hoevels; Martin Kocher; Volker Sturm; Mohammad Maarouf
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Imaging and extent of surgical resection predict risk of meningioma recurrence better than WHO histopathological grade.

Authors:  William L Hwang; Ariel E Marciscano; Andrzej Niemierko; Daniel W Kim; Anat O Stemmer-Rachamimov; William T Curry; Fred G Barker; Robert L Martuza; Jay S Loeffler; Kevin S Oh; Helen A Shih; Mykol Larvie
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Radiomics and machine learning may accurately predict the grade and histological subtype in meningiomas using conventional and diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Yae Won Park; Jongmin Oh; Seng Chan You; Kyunghwa Han; Sung Soo Ahn; Yoon Seong Choi; Jong Hee Chang; Se Hoon Kim; Seung-Koo Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.