| Literature DB >> 25147669 |
Samia Siddique1, Quratulain Syed2, Ahmad Adnan1, Fahim Ashraf Qureshi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Secondary metabolite production from wild strains is very low for economical purpose therefore certain strain improvement strategies are required to achieve hundred times greater yield of metabolites. Most important strain improvement techniques include physical and chemical mutagenesis. Broad spectrum mutagenesis through UV irradiation is the most important and convenient physical method.Entities:
Keywords: Avermectin B1b; Hereditary Stability; Mutagenesis; Streptomyces avermitilis; Submerged Fermentation
Year: 2014 PMID: 25147669 PMCID: PMC4138686 DOI: 10.5812/jjm.8626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Jundishapur J Microbiol ISSN: 2008-3645 Impact factor: 0.747
Figure 1.Avermectin Chemical Structure
Figure 2.Effects of Different UV Radiation Times of on the Survival and Lethality Rates
Figure 3.HPLC Chromatogram
(A) Standard solution of Abamectin, (B) B1b produced from the EB 30 strain (minutes) 2, (C) B1b produced from the UV 45 strain (minutes) 3, (D) B1b produced from the EMS 50 strain (minutes) 1
Figure 4.Effects of Different EMS (1 µL/mL) Treatment Times on the Survival and Lethality Rates
Effects of Different Concentrations of EB on the Survival and Lethality Rates
| Conc. of EB | Exposure Time | Colonies, No. | Survival Rate, % | Lethality Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 0 | 150 | 100 | 0.01 | |
| 10 | 140 | 93.33 | 0.010 | |
| 20 | 140 | 93.33 | 0.010 | |
| 30 | 130 | 86.66 | 0.011 | |
| 40 | 120 | 80 | 0.012 | |
| 50 | 120 | 80 | 0.012 | |
| 60 | 100 | 66.66 | 0.015 | |
|
| ||||
| 0 | 150 | 100 | 0.01 | |
| 10 | 100 | 66.66 | 0.015 | |
| 20 | 90 | 60 | 0.016 | |
| 30 | 90 | 60 | 0.016 | |
| 40 | 80 | 53.33 | 0.018 | |
| 50 | 80 | 53.33 | 0.018 | |
| 60 | 70 | 46.66 | 0.021 | |
|
| ||||
| 0 | 150 | 100 | 0.01 | |
| 10 | 5 | 3.33 | 0.300 | |
| 20 | 10 | 6.66 | 0.150 | |
| 30 | 4 | 2.66 | 0.375 | |
| 40 | 10 | 6.66 | 0.150 | |
| 50 | 2 | 1.33 | 0.751 | |
| 60 | 8 | 5.33 | 0.187 | |
|
| ||||
| 0 | 150 | 100 | 0.01 | |
| 10 | 10 | 6.66 | 0.150 | |
| 20 | 10 | 6.66 | 0.150 | |
| 30 | 8 | 5.33 | 0.187 | |
| 40 | 8 | 5.33 | 0.187 | |
| 50 | 6 | 4.00 | 0.25 | |
| 60 | 6 | 4.00 | 0.25 |
Figure 5.Comparative Analysis of Production of Avermectin B1b by Different Mutants With the Parent Original Strain, S. avermitilis 41445
Analysis of Heriditary Stability of UV 45(m) 3 Strain
| Generation | Avermectin B1b Production, mg/L |
|---|---|
|
| 254.14 |
|
| 260.18 |
|
| 230.56 |
|
| 245.36 |
|
| 251.67 |
|
| 258.61 |
|
| 235.81 |
|
| 240.98 |
Comparative Production of avermectin B1b From Different Mutated Strains
| Serial No. | Type of Mutagen | Exposure Time, mmin | Colonies, No. | Number of Colonies Producing avermectin B1b | Concentration of B1b Produced, mg/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| UV | ||||
| 45 | 6 | 2 | UV (45) 1=43.51; UV (45) 3=254.14 | ||
| 55 | 5 | 3 | UV (55) 1=72.43; UV (55) 2=200.27; UV (55) 3=64.11 | ||
| 60 | 4 | 4 | UV (60) 1=64.70; UV (60) 2=31.46; UV (60) 3=49.34; UV (60) 4=106.35 | ||
|
| EMS | ||||
| 20 | 2 | 2 | EMS (10) 1 = 90.01; EMS (10) 2 = 90.01 | ||
| 20 | 2 | 2 | EMS (20)1 = 179.93; EMS (20)2 = 192.06 | ||
| 50 | 1 | 1 | EMS (50)1 = 202.63 | ||
|
| EB | ||||
| 10 | 5 | 2 | EB (10)1 = 70.68; EB (10)2 = 119.48 | ||
| 30 | 4 | 3 | EB (30)1 = 138.43; EB (30)2 = 199.30; EB (30)3 = 63.17 | ||
| 50 | 2 | 2 | EB (50)1 = 52.03; EB (50)2 = 84.96 |