Melissa M Garrido1, Shannon T Harrington, Holly G Prigerson. 1. Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, New York; Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify targets for interventions to reduce end-of-life care disparities among patients with advanced cancer. To do this, the authors evaluated the degree to which end-of-life care values and preferences are associated with advance care planning within racial/ethnic minority groups. METHODS: The Coping with Cancer study recruited patients with advanced cancer from outpatient clinics in 5 states from 2002 to 2008. Then, the rates of 1 type of advance care planning-do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders-reported at baseline interviews by 606 patients were investigated. Bivariate tests determined associations among DNR order completion, religious values, and treatment preferences within racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS: Non-Latino white patients were significantly more likely to have a DNR order (45%) than black (25%) and Latino (20%) patients (P<.001). A preference against specific life-prolonging treatment (eg, chemotherapy, ventilation) was the only factor significantly associated with higher DNR order likelihood in each group, with non-Latino white patients more likely than Latino or black patients to express preferences against life-prolonging care (eg, 26% of non-Latino white patients, 46% of black patients, and 41% of Latino patients wanted a feeding tube if it would extend life for 1 more day; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preferences against life-prolonging care differ dramatically by race/ethnicity, but they have a uniform significant association with DNR order completion rates across racial/ethnic groups of patients with advanced cancer. Advance care planning interventions that target preferences associated with DNR orders across racial/ethnic groups may reach a broad patient population and reduce end-of-life care disparities.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify targets for interventions to reduce end-of-life care disparities among patients with advanced cancer. To do this, the authors evaluated the degree to which end-of-life care values and preferences are associated with advance care planning within racial/ethnic minority groups. METHODS: The Coping with Cancer study recruited patients with advanced cancer from outpatient clinics in 5 states from 2002 to 2008. Then, the rates of 1 type of advance care planning-do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders-reported at baseline interviews by 606 patients were investigated. Bivariate tests determined associations among DNR order completion, religious values, and treatment preferences within racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS:Non-Latino whitepatients were significantly more likely to have a DNR order (45%) than black (25%) and Latino (20%) patients (P<.001). A preference against specific life-prolonging treatment (eg, chemotherapy, ventilation) was the only factor significantly associated with higher DNR order likelihood in each group, with non-Latino whitepatients more likely than Latino or black patients to express preferences against life-prolonging care (eg, 26% of non-Latino whitepatients, 46% of black patients, and 41% of Latino patients wanted a feeding tube if it would extend life for 1 more day; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preferences against life-prolonging care differ dramatically by race/ethnicity, but they have a uniform significant association with DNR order completion rates across racial/ethnic groups of patients with advanced cancer. Advance care planning interventions that target preferences associated with DNR orders across racial/ethnic groups may reach a broad patient population and reduce end-of-life care disparities.
Authors: Paul K Maciejewski; Andrea C Phelps; Elizabeth L Kacel; Tracy A Balboni; Michael Balboni; Alexi A Wright; William Pirl; Holly G Prigerson Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Elizabeth T Loggers; Paul K Maciejewski; Rachel Jimenez; Matthew Nilsson; Elizabeth Paulk; Heather Stieglitz; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Andrea C Phelps; Paul K Maciejewski; Matthew Nilsson; Tracy A Balboni; Alexi A Wright; M Elizabeth Paulk; Elizabeth Trice; Deborah Schrag; John R Peteet; Susan D Block; Holly G Prigerson Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ana I Tergas; Holly G Prigerson; Megan J Shen; Lisa M Bates; Alfred I Neugut; Jason D Wright; Paul K Maciejewski Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Megan Johnson Shen; Cyndi Gonzalez; Benjamin Leach; Paul K Maciejewski; Elissa Kozlov; Holly G Prigerson Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2020-06
Authors: James Gerhart; Yasmin Asvat; Emily Lattie; Sean O'Mahony; Paul Duberstein; Michael Hoerger Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Huzaifah Salat; Andrei Javier; Edward D Siew; Rocio Figueroa; Loren Lipworth; Edmond Kabagambe; Aihua Bian; Thomas G Stewart; Maie H El-Sourady; Mohana Karlekar; Cesar Y Cardona; T Alp Ikizler; Khaled Abdel-Kader Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Meng-Yun Lin; Nancy R Kressin; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Eun Ji Kim; Lenny López; Jennifer E Rosen; Amresh D Hanchate Journal: Med Care Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.983