Literature DB >> 25143314

Characterization and improved quantification of left ventricular inflow using streamline visualization with 4DFlow MRI in healthy controls and patients after atrioventricular septal defect correction.

Emmeline E Calkoen1,2, Arno A W Roest1, Lucia J M Kroft3, Rob J van der Geest3, Monique R M Jongbloed2, Pieter J van den Boogaard3, Nico A Blom1, Mark G Hazekamp4, Albert de Roos3, Jos J M Westenberg3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate trans-left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) blood flow and optimize left ventricular inflow quantification in healthy controls and patients after atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) correction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients after AVSD correction and 25 controls underwent 4DFlow MRI. Using streamline visualization in four- and two-chamber views, inflow direction at early and late filling was defined at the annulus level and at the peak inflow velocity (PIV) level. Trans-LAVV flow volume and velocity were assessed from a static 2D-multiplanar-reformat (MPR), a 4D-MPR tracking LAVV annulus and a 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, angulated perpendicular to the inflow.
RESULTS: In patients, on average 9° more laterally directed inflow was found at the PIV-level compared to controls. In controls, 4DFlow velocity mapping with LAVV annulus tracking resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (3 (1-8) mL) than with static 2D-MPR (7 (4-16) mL, P = 0.001). In patients, 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (2 (1-4) mL) than with 4D-MPR LAVV annulus tracking (6 (2-10) mL, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Streamline visualization of 4DFlow MRI data revealed dynamic trans-LAVV inflow and more lateral flow after AVSD correction. Streamline visualization improved trans-LAVV flow quantification as the positioning and angulation of the measurement plane was optimized, allowing an accurate assessment of left ventricular inflow.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4DFlow MRI; atrioventricular septal defect; intracardiac flow

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25143314     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  14 in total

Review 1.  4D flow MRI applications in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Judy Rizk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Characterization and quantification of dynamic eccentric regurgitation of the left atrioventricular valve after atrioventricular septal defect correction with 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and retrospective valve tracking.

Authors:  Emmeline E Calkoen; Jos J M Westenberg; Lucia J M Kroft; Nico A Blom; Mark G Hazekamp; Marry E Rijlaarsdam; Monique R M Jongbloed; Albert de Roos; Arno A W Roest
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 3.  Advanced Analysis Techniques for Intra-cardiac Flow Evaluation from 4D Flow MRI.

Authors:  Rob J van der Geest; Pankaj Garg
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-05-20

Review 4.  Hemodynamic Measurement Using Four-Dimensional Phase-Contrast MRI: Quantification of Hemodynamic Parameters and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Hojin Ha; Guk Bae Kim; Jihoon Kweon; Sang Joon Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Deok Hee Lee; Dong Hyun Yang; Namkug Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Assessment of viscous energy loss and the association with three-dimensional vortex ring formation in left ventricular inflow: In vivo evaluation using four-dimensional flow MRI.

Authors:  Mohammed S M Elbaz; Rob J van der Geest; Emmeline E Calkoen; Albert de Roos; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Arno A W Roest; Jos J M Westenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Unravelling cardiovascular disease using four dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Vivian P Kamphuis; Jos J M Westenberg; Roel L F van der Palen; Nico A Blom; Albert de Roos; Rob van der Geest; Mohammed S M Elbaz; Arno A W Roest
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  In-scan and scan-rescan assessment of LV in- and outflow volumes by 4D flow MRI versus 2D planimetry.

Authors:  Vivian P Kamphuis; Roel L F van der Palen; Patrick J H de Koning; Mohammed S M Elbaz; Rob J van der Geest; Albert de Roos; Arno A W Roest; Jos J M Westenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in whole-heart four-dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two-center, 1.5 Tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Jos J M Westenberg; Pieter J van den Boogaard; Peter P Swoboda; Rahoz Aziz; James R J Foley; Graham J Fent; F G J Tyl; L Coratella; Mohammed S M ElBaz; R J van der Geest; David M Higgins; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Creating hemodynamic atlases of cardiac 4D flow MRI.

Authors:  Merih Cibis; Mariana Bustamante; Jonatan Eriksson; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement.

Authors:  Petter Dyverfeldt; Malenka Bissell; Alex J Barker; Ann F Bolger; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers; Christopher J Francios; Alex Frydrychowicz; Julia Geiger; Daniel Giese; Michael D Hope; Philip J Kilner; Sebastian Kozerke; Saul Myerson; Stefan Neubauer; Oliver Wieben; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.