PURPOSE: To evaluate trans-left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) blood flow and optimize left ventricular inflow quantification in healthy controls and patients after atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients after AVSD correction and 25 controls underwent 4DFlow MRI. Using streamline visualization in four- and two-chamber views, inflow direction at early and late filling was defined at the annulus level and at the peak inflow velocity (PIV) level. Trans-LAVV flow volume and velocity were assessed from a static 2D-multiplanar-reformat (MPR), a 4D-MPR tracking LAVV annulus and a 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, angulated perpendicular to the inflow. RESULTS: In patients, on average 9° more laterally directed inflow was found at the PIV-level compared to controls. In controls, 4DFlow velocity mapping with LAVV annulus tracking resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (3 (1-8) mL) than with static 2D-MPR (7 (4-16) mL, P = 0.001). In patients, 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (2 (1-4) mL) than with 4D-MPR LAVV annulus tracking (6 (2-10) mL, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Streamline visualization of 4DFlow MRI data revealed dynamic trans-LAVV inflow and more lateral flow after AVSD correction. Streamline visualization improved trans-LAVV flow quantification as the positioning and angulation of the measurement plane was optimized, allowing an accurate assessment of left ventricular inflow.
PURPOSE: To evaluate trans-left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) blood flow and optimize left ventricular inflow quantification in healthy controls and patients after atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients after AVSD correction and 25 controls underwent 4DFlow MRI. Using streamline visualization in four- and two-chamber views, inflow direction at early and late filling was defined at the annulus level and at the peak inflow velocity (PIV) level. Trans-LAVV flow volume and velocity were assessed from a static 2D-multiplanar-reformat (MPR), a 4D-MPR tracking LAVV annulus and a 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, angulated perpendicular to the inflow. RESULTS: In patients, on average 9° more laterally directed inflow was found at the PIV-level compared to controls. In controls, 4DFlow velocity mapping with LAVV annulus tracking resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (3 (1-8) mL) than with static 2D-MPR (7 (4-16) mL, P = 0.001). In patients, 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (2 (1-4) mL) than with 4D-MPR LAVV annulus tracking (6 (2-10) mL, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Streamline visualization of 4DFlow MRI data revealed dynamic trans-LAVV inflow and more lateral flow after AVSD correction. Streamline visualization improved trans-LAVV flow quantification as the positioning and angulation of the measurement plane was optimized, allowing an accurate assessment of left ventricular inflow.
Authors: Emmeline E Calkoen; Jos J M Westenberg; Lucia J M Kroft; Nico A Blom; Mark G Hazekamp; Marry E Rijlaarsdam; Monique R M Jongbloed; Albert de Roos; Arno A W Roest Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Mohammed S M Elbaz; Rob J van der Geest; Emmeline E Calkoen; Albert de Roos; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Arno A W Roest; Jos J M Westenberg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Vivian P Kamphuis; Jos J M Westenberg; Roel L F van der Palen; Nico A Blom; Albert de Roos; Rob van der Geest; Mohammed S M Elbaz; Arno A W Roest Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Vivian P Kamphuis; Roel L F van der Palen; Patrick J H de Koning; Mohammed S M Elbaz; Rob J van der Geest; Albert de Roos; Arno A W Roest; Jos J M Westenberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Pankaj Garg; Jos J M Westenberg; Pieter J van den Boogaard; Peter P Swoboda; Rahoz Aziz; James R J Foley; Graham J Fent; F G J Tyl; L Coratella; Mohammed S M ElBaz; R J van der Geest; David M Higgins; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Petter Dyverfeldt; Malenka Bissell; Alex J Barker; Ann F Bolger; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers; Christopher J Francios; Alex Frydrychowicz; Julia Geiger; Daniel Giese; Michael D Hope; Philip J Kilner; Sebastian Kozerke; Saul Myerson; Stefan Neubauer; Oliver Wieben; Michael Markl Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 5.364