Literature DB >> 25141903

Age trend of the male to female sex ratio in surgical gastric cancer patients at a single institution.

Junxiu Yu1, Yongjun He, Zhen Guo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In previous reports concerning the association between sex disparity and age, gastric cancer (GC) patients were simply divided into younger and older groups by age. We analyzed the age trend of the male to female sex ratio (MFSR) in GC based on patient sequential age in order to observe the changing process of MFSR with age.
METHODS: One thousand seven hundred fifty-one surgical gastric adenocarcinoma patients aged 26 to 85 years were investigated between January 1996 and December 2010. The patients were grouped by age intervals of 5 years. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to determine how the MFSR changed with age.
RESULTS: The median age of the 1,751 patients with GC was 60 years (26 to 85 years). There were 1,334 male and 417 female patients (MFSR was 3.20). Cochran-Armitage trend test analysis showed that total MFSR increased significantly with age (Z = 5.964, P < 0.0001). Further studies on age groups of 26 to 60 years and 61 to 85 years were conducted. The trend test showed that MFSR increased significantly with age from 26 to 60 years (Z = 7.433, P < 0.0001). However, MFSR did not increase in ages 61 to 85 years (Z = -0.607, P = 0.544).
CONCLUSIONS: MFSR in GC presented an increasing trend until 60 years of age. The male GC patients showed an increasing tendency, and female GC patients showed a decreasing tendency with age. This trend reached a plateau phase after 60 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25141903      PMCID: PMC4155119          DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1477-7819            Impact factor:   2.754


Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is among the most common malignant tumors worldwide, even taking into consideration that the incidence of GC has recently decreased in some countries. In 2008, nearly 995,000 new GC patients were identified worldwide. Among these new cases, a total of 646,000 were male and 349,000 were female. The male-female sex ratio (MFSR) was 1.851 [1]. A total of 377,000 new GC cases were estimated to occur in China in 2005; the MFSR was 2.04 [2]. Similar results were reported by GLOBOCAN 2008; the male-female sex ratio was 1.84 and 2.13 in the world and China, respectively. Additionally, the male cases were more numerous compared to female cases in hospitalized GC patients. The MFSR from a large series of data for Japanese surgical patients with GC that was collected from 187 hospitals in 2001 was 2.29:1 [3]. Jeong et al. [4] reported that MFSR was 2.05:1 in data from 14,658 surgical GC patients that were collected from 59 Korean institutions in 2009. The MFSR of 1,451 GC patients who underwent surgery from 1999 to 2003 from a single Chinese institute was 2.19:1 [5]. However, male GC patients were not predominant at every age. Qiu et al. [6] reported that the MFSR increased with an increase in age. The total MFSR was 2.15:1. But, the MFSR of young GC patients (aged 50 years or younger) was 1.39. The MFSR of older GC cases (over 50 years of age) was 2.64. Chung et al. [7] analyzed 3,242 young patients with GC between 18 and 45 years of age. The total MFSR was 1.17. The MFSR were 0.63, 1.01, and 1.67 in 18 to 30-year, 31 to 40-year, 41 to 45-year age groups, respectively. Thus, the MFSR was lower in young GC patients compared to older GC patients. The above-mentioned studies demonstrated that there are sex disparities in GC patients in different age groups. There may be more female GC patients compared to males at an early age. Therefore, the number of female GC patients decreases with age. However, in previous studies concerning the association between sex disparity and age, the patients were simply divided into younger and older groups by age. It has remained unclear how the MFSR changed; moreover, the time point at which the change stops has not been elucidated. Thus, in this study, we analyzed the changing process of MFSR by sequential GC patient age in order to observe the age trend of MFSR in GC. And, we hope our study could potentially be helpful to explore the factors that influence the pathogenesis of GC in female adults.

Methods

Patient population

Data were obtained from surgical patients from Liaocheng People’s Hospital (Shandong, China) from January 1996 to December 2010. All medical records of cases diagnosed with GC were reviewed. The patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were selected. The patients with GC of other histological types were eliminated. A total of 1,758 cases with medical records that satisfied the study requirements were investigated. All patients were grouped by interval ages of 5 years. Five patients (three cases were male, two were female) aged 20 to 25 years, and two patients (one from each sex) aged 86 to 88 years, were excluded from the study because the number of patients was too small to complete an age group. Finally, a total of 1,751 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were included in this study. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Liaocheng People’s Hospital.

Statistical analysis

The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to identify the age trend of MFSR. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance was defined as a P value less than 0.05. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

The median age of 1,751 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma was 60 years (26 to 85 years). A histogram of all patient ages according to sex is shown in Figure  1; there were 1,334 male and 417 female patients. The MFSR of all GC patients was 3.20. The median age of patients was 58 years (27 to 84 years) in females and 61 years (26 to 85 years) in males.
Figure 1

A histogram of male and female gastric cancer patients by age.

A histogram of male and female gastric cancer patients by age. The Cochran-Armitage trend test showed that the MFSR increased significantly with age (Z = 5.964, P < 0.0001) in total GC cases. The MFSR curve (Basis spline) by each age group is shown in Figure  2.
Figure 2

The male-female sex ratio (MFSR) of each age group patients with gastric cancer, and the Basis spline.

The male-female sex ratio (MFSR) of each age group patients with gastric cancer, and the Basis spline. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to analyze whether there was a variation in trend for MFSR from ages 26 to 60 years and from ages 61 to 85 years. The results showed that MFSR increased significantly with age from 26 to 60 years (Z = 7.433, P < 0.0001). However, MFSR did not increase with age from 61 to 85 years (Z = -0.607, P = 0.544). As shown in Figure  2, the MFSR increased until the 56 to 60 age group, and MFSR reached a plateau after this age group.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to analyze the age trend of MFSR in GC using a trend test based on patient sequential age. These results, which are based on continuous data, are more reliable compared to previous studies that divided patients simply into younger and older age groups. The results show that MFSR increased gradually with age. The percentage of female GC cases gradually decreased with age. The percentage of male GC cases gradually increased with age. Compared to male GC patients, female patients exhibited a decreasing trend with age. Our results are in concordance with data from the National Cancer Center of China. The data from 2003 to 2007 showed that the male to female incidence ratio of GC was elevated with age [8]. Rutegard et al. [9] found similar results based on a study of the sex disparities in GC incidence in Sweden from 1970 to 2006. The sex (male to female) ratios of gastric non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma presented increasing tendency in the 1970 to 1986 and 1987 to 2006 periods. The MFSR did not continue to increase after 60 years; it reached a plateau in our study. The Cochran-Armitage trend test showed that the MFSR increased gradually in the 26 to 60 years group but did not increase in the 61 to 85 years group. Our results are supported in a study by Rutegard et al. [9]. They reported the sex (male to female) ratios of non-cardia GC patients increased steadily with age and reached a plateau in the age group 65 to 74 years. The male to female ratio of incidence of GC in China present as an ‘S" type [8]. The ratio remained almost the same before 30 years of age and began to increase markedly at 30 years of age, reaching a plateau after 60 years. Thus, the MFSR in our study was in conformity with the incidence of GC in China. It is unfortunate that the trend of MFSR before 30 years of age could not statistically analyzed in our study due to limited data. There are few studies of the trend of MFSR in GC. This study did not evaluate why the proportion of female GC patients showed a decreasing tendency and the proportion of male GC patients showed an increasing tendency with age. Presumably, male individuals experience a greater attack from environmental pathogenic factors (such as H. pylori infection, high salt diet, smoking, etcetera) compared to females by the time adulthood is reached. Some studies [10] have suggested that a later acquisition of H. pylori gastritis in females compared to males causes later onset of GC. Therefore, the abovementioned fact may explain why the proportion of male GC patients tended to increase after 30 years of age. Another reason may be the protective effect of estrogen for GC [11-14]. Duell et al. [15] found that women with an ovariectomy had a 79% increased risk of GC compared with women who had no ovariectomy. A population-based prospective study of women aged 40 to 70 years was conducted based on 73,442 Shanghai women with 154 GC patients [16]. The results showed that there were no associations between GC risk and age of menarche, number of children, breast feeding, or oral contraceptive use. However, there were associations between GC risk and age of menopause and years of fertility. Recently, a meta-analysis demonstrated that exposure to ovarian or exogenous estrogen may decrease the risk of GC [17]. Longer years of fertility (RR = 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.86) and hormone replacement therapy decreased GC risk (RR = 0.74, 0.77, respectively). However, the age at menarche, age at menopause, years of fertility, parity, age at first birth, and oral contraceptive use were not found to be associated with GC risk. A Korean multicenter cancer cohort study demonstrated that isoflavone and phytoestrogens were associated with decreased risk for GC [18]. Some reports have indicated that treatment with tamoxifen, an antiestrogen, increased the incidence of GC in women and men [12, 19].

Conclusions

In conclusion, Cochran-Armitage trend test analysis indicated that the proportion of female GC patients showed a decreasing tendency and proportion of male GC patients showed an increasing tendency with age. However this trend stops after 60 years of age.
  18 in total

Review 1.  Estrogen and gastrointestinal malignancy.

Authors:  A M Hogan; D Collins; A W Baird; D C Winter
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.102

2.  Estrogen and risk of gastric cancer: a protective effect in a nationwide cohort study of patients with prostate cancer in Sweden.

Authors:  Mats Lindblad; Weimin Ye; Carlos Rubio; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Isoflavones from phytoestrogens and gastric cancer risk: a nested case-control study within the Korean Multicenter Cancer Cohort.

Authors:  Kwang-Pil Ko; Sue K Park; Boyoung Park; Jae Jeong Yang; Lisa Y Cho; Chungwon Kang; Cheong Sik Kim; Jin Gwack; Aesun Shin; Yeonju Kim; Jeongseon Kim; Han-Kwang Yang; Daehee Kang; Soung-Hoon Chang; Hai-Rim Shin; Keun-Young Yoo
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Menstrual and reproductive factors, exogenous hormone use, and gastric cancer risk in a cohort of women from the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition.

Authors:  Eric J Duell; Noémie Travier; Leila Lujan-Barroso; M C Boutron-Ruault; F Clavel-Chapelon; Domenico Palli; Vittorio Krogh; Amalia Mattiello; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Laudina Rodriguez; Emilio Sanchez-Cantalejo; Carmen Navarro; Aurelio Barricarte; Miren Dorronsoro; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas Wareham; Naomi E Allen; Konstantinos K Tsilidis; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Suzanne M Jeurnink; M E Numans; Petra H M Peeters; Pagona Lagiou; Elisabeth Valanou; Antonia Trichopoulou; Rudolf Kaaks; Annekatrin Lukanova-McGregor; Manuela M Bergman; Heiner Boeing; Jonas Manjer; Björn Lindkvist; Roger Stenling; Göran Hallmans; Christina C Dahm; Kim Overvad; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjonneland; Kjersti Bakken; Eiliv Lund; Mazda Jenab; Valerie McCormack; Sabina Rinaldi; Dominique Michaud; Traci Mouw; Gabriella Nesi; Fatima Carneiro; Elio Riboli; Carlos A González
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Sex differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma in Sweden 1970-2006.

Authors:  Martin Rutegård; Richard Shore; Yunxia Lu; Pernilla Lagergren; Mats Lindblad
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  Incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in China.

Authors:  Ling Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Menstrual and reproductive risk factors and risk for gastric adenocarcinoma in women: findings from the canadian national enhanced cancer surveillance system.

Authors:  Sarah Frise; Nancy Kreiger; Steven Gallinger; George Tomlinson; Michelle Cotterchio
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 8.  Oestrogen and the enigmatic male predominance of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Evangelos Chandanos; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry.

Authors:  Yoh Isobe; Atsushi Nashimoto; Kohei Akazawa; Ichiro Oda; Kenichi Hayashi; Isao Miyashiro; Hitoshi Katai; Shunichi Tsujitani; Yasuhiro Kodera; Yasuyuki Seto; Michio Kaminishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Oh Jeong; Young-Kyu Park
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  4 in total

1.  Treatment features of systemic chemotherapy in young adults with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

Authors:  Izuma Nakayama; Keisho Chin; Daisuke Takahari; Mariko Ogura; Takashi Ichimura; Takeru Wakatsuki; Hiroki Osumi; Yumiko Ota; Takeshi Suzuki; Mitsukuni Suenaga; Eiji Shinozaki; Kensei Yamaguchi
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Association study between genetic polymorphisms in folate metabolism and gastric cancer susceptibility in Chinese Han population: A case-control study.

Authors:  Lusha Wei; Fanglin Niu; Jiamin Wu; Fulin Chen; Hua Yang; Jing Li; Tianbo Jin; Yifei Wu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.183

3.  Influence of age on postoperative complications especially pneumonia after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chikashi Shibata; Hitoshi Ogawa; Toru Nakano; Kaori Koyama; Kuniharu Yamamoto; Munenori Nagao; Daisuke Takeyama; Kazuhiro Takami; Akihiro Yasumoto; Tomohiko Sase; Shun-Ichi Kimura; Kentaro Sawada; Yu Katayose
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Sex-based differences in histology, staging, and prognosis among 2983 gastric cancer surgery patients.

Authors:  Yonghoon Choi; Nayoung Kim; Ki Wook Kim; Hyeong Ho Jo; Jaehyung Park; Hyuk Yoon; Cheol Min Shin; Young Soo Park; Dong Ho Lee; Hyeon Jeong Oh; Hye Seung Lee; Young Suk Park; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Yun-Suhk Suh; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Ji-Won Kim; Jin Won Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Won Chang; Ji Hoon Park; Yoon Jin Lee; Kyoung Ho Lee; Young Hoon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.