Literature DB >> 25141597

Positive display polarity is particularly advantageous for small character sizes: implications for display design.

Cosima Piepenbrock, Susanne Mayr, Axel Buchner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the display luminance hypothesis of the positive polarity advantage and gain insights for display design, the joint effects of display polarity and character size were assessed with a proofreading task
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that dark characters on light background (positive polarity) lead to better legibility than do light characters on dark background (negative polarity), presumably due to the typically higher display luminance of positive polarity presentations.
METHOD: Participants performed a proofreading task with black text on white background or white text on black background. Texts were presented in four character sizes (8, 10, 12, and 14 pt; corresponding to 0.22 degrees, 0.25 degrees, 0.31 degrees, and 0.34 degrees of vertical visual angle).
RESULTS: A positive polarity advantage was observed in proofreading performance. Importantly, the positive polarity advantage linearly increased with decreasing character size.
CONCLUSION: The findings are in line with the assumption that the typically higher luminance of positive polarity displays leads to an improved perception of detail. Application: The implications seem important for the design of text on such displays as those of computers, automotive control and entertainment systems, and smartphones that are increasingly used for the consumption of text-based media and communication. The sizes of these displays are limited, and it is tempting to use small font sizes to convey as much information as possible. Especially with small font sizes, negative polarity displays should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25141597     DOI: 10.1177/0018720813515509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  6 in total

1.  Gray scale inversion imaging (GSI) in Trauma and Orthopaedics.

Authors:  A Shah; K P Iyengar; R Botchu
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-16

2.  Learning Experience Design in Health Professions Education: A Conceptual Review of Evidence for Educators.

Authors:  Joann Pan; Jessica Sheu; Lauren Massimo; Kevin R Scott; Andrew W Phillips
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  Utilising psychophysical techniques to investigate the effects of age, typeface design, size and display polarity on glance legibility.

Authors:  Jonathan Dobres; Nadine Chahine; Bryan Reimer; David Gould; Bruce Mehler; Joseph F Coughlin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The effect of pupil size and peripheral brightness on detection and discrimination performance.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Mathôt; Yavor Ivanov
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Baseline MNREAD Measures for Normally Sighted Subjects From Childhood to Old Age.

Authors:  Aurélie Calabrèse; Allen M Y Cheong; Sing-Hang Cheung; Yingchen He; MiYoung Kwon; J Stephen Mansfield; Ahalya Subramanian; Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Age-related differences in the legibility of degraded text.

Authors:  Benjamin Wolfe; Jonathan Dobres; Anna Kosovicheva; Ruth Rosenholtz; Bryan Reimer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.