INTRODUCTION: Most cardiomyocytes do not regenerate after myocardial infarction. Porcine small intestinal submucosa has been shown to be effective in tissue repair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate myocardial tissue regeneration and functional effects of SIS implantation in pigs after left ventriculotomy. METHODS: Fifteen pigs were assigned to two groups: porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) (N=10) and control (N=5). The SIS group underwent a mini sternotomy, left ventriculotomy and placement of a SIS patch. The control group underwent a sham procedure. Echocardiography was performed before and 60 days after the surgical procedure. Histological analysis was performed with hematoxylin-eosin stain and markers for actin 1A4, anti sarcomeric actin, connexin43 and factor VIII. RESULTS: Weight gain was similar in both groups. Echocardiography analysis revealed no difference between groups regarding end diastolic and systolic diameters and left ventricular ejection fraction, both pre (P=0.118, P=0.313, P=0.944) and post procedure (P=0.333, P=0.522, P=0.628). Both groups showed an increase in end diastolic (P<0,001 for both) and systolic diameter 60 days after surgery (P=0.005, SIS group and P=0.004, control group). New cardiomyocytes, blood vessels and inflammatory reactions were histologically identified in the SIS group. CONCLUSION: SIS implantation in pigs after left ventriculotomy was associated with angiomuscular regeneration and no damage in cardiac function.
INTRODUCTION: Most cardiomyocytes do not regenerate after myocardial infarction. Porcine small intestinal submucosa has been shown to be effective in tissue repair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate myocardial tissue regeneration and functional effects of SIS implantation in pigs after left ventriculotomy. METHODS: Fifteen pigs were assigned to two groups: porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) (N=10) and control (N=5). The SIS group underwent a mini sternotomy, left ventriculotomy and placement of a SIS patch. The control group underwent a sham procedure. Echocardiography was performed before and 60 days after the surgical procedure. Histological analysis was performed with hematoxylin-eosin stain and markers for actin 1A4, anti sarcomeric actin, connexin43 and factor VIII. RESULTS:Weight gain was similar in both groups. Echocardiography analysis revealed no difference between groups regarding end diastolic and systolic diameters and left ventricular ejection fraction, both pre (P=0.118, P=0.313, P=0.944) and post procedure (P=0.333, P=0.522, P=0.628). Both groups showed an increase in end diastolic (P<0,001 for both) and systolic diameter 60 days after surgery (P=0.005, SIS group and P=0.004, control group). New cardiomyocytes, blood vessels and inflammatory reactions were histologically identified in the SIS group. CONCLUSION:SIS implantation in pigs after left ventriculotomy was associated with angiomuscular regeneration and no damage in cardiac function.
Although several studies have suggested that mitotic division occurs in the heart, the
vast majority of cardiomyocytes do not have the ability to regenerate after myocardial
infarction. Myocardial infarction leads to deterioration of contractile element function
and, if ventricular remodeling is extensive in the infarcted area, heart failure may
occur[.Tissue regeneration after transmural fibrosis remains a major concern. Porcine small
intestinal submucosa (SIS) is a xenogeneic membrane, classified as biodegradable
material since it has natural properties that allow for use as a biomaterial[.Through extensive research in various areas of medicine, SIS has been shown to be
versatile and efficient in tissue repair. It does not trigger an antigenic response and
is capable of inducing regeneration of the native tissue in which it was
deployed[.Tissue replacement in the body and development of new grafts using biomaterials are
major challenges in regenerative surgery. SIS is an alternative that should be further
studied[.Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the ability of myocardial tissue regeneration
following SIS implant after left ventriculotomy in pigs.
METHODS
All experiments were performed in accordance with the Guiding for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals approved by the American Physiological Society[ and the EU Directive 2010/63/EU for
animal experiments.This project was presented to CEUA (Committee of Ethics in Research in Animal Use of the
PUCPR) and approved under article number 563 on 02/09/2010.
Submucosa Preparation and Decontamination
SIS was obtained by resection of the proximal jejunum segment of healthy pigs. The
mesentery was removed, the intestinal segment was inverted and the mucosa was removed
by scraping, taking precautions to not cut the tissue. After reversal of the inverted
segment, the seromuscular extract was removed in the same manner. The resulting
tissue consisting of the submucosal layer of the small intestine was washed in an
isotonic saline solution and stored in a 10% neomycin sulfate solution.
Decontamination was performed with a stabilized chlorine dioxide (0.04%) saline
solution using a shaker (Bureau 109M, New Ethics Ltda.) for 24 hours[.
Experimental Model
This experimental study included 15 (Landrace) adult pigs, with an average weight of
13.75 kg. The animals were randomized 2:1 and divided into two groups:• SIS group (N=10): SIS implantation after left ventriculotomy;• Control group (N=5): Mini lower sternotomy.The animals were anesthetized with intramuscular administration of pre hydrochloride
(1.0 mg/kg), ketamine (20 mg/kg) and acepromazine maleate 1% (0.05 mg/kg) and
received prophylactic antibiotics (gentamicin sulfate 5 mg/kg).The pigs were monitored with an electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry and denitrization
with oxygen at 100%, anesthetized with propofol at a dose of 6 mg/kg and intubated.
The animals were kept under a mechanical ventilation system with a 50% mix of oxygen
and nitrous oxide.Transoperative analgesics included intravenous 2 mg/kg morphine, 2 mg/kg lidocaine,
and 2 mg/kg ketamine. The immediate post operatory analgesic administered was 1.1
mg/kg flunixin meglumine, and in the subsequent post operatory periods 50 mg/kg of
intramuscular tramadol was administered.The animals were placed in a dorsal decubitus position. An incision was performed
from the sixth intercostal space to the xiphoid appendix in the lower third of the
sternum, and subsequently to the lower inferior sternotomy. The pericardium was
opened, and the left and right ventricles were visible.While the heart was beating, partial clamping of the left ventricular apex was
performed excluding the anterior interventricular coronary, and a left ventriculotomy
of approximately 30 mm in diameter was performed (Figures 1A/B). SIS implantation was performed (approximately 60 mm x 30
mm, double layered) on the apical portion of the left ventricle with a polypropylene
5.0 wire suture (Figures 1C/D). The animals
were extubated, monitored in the recovery laboratory, and followed for a period of 60
days.
Fig. 1
A) Partial clamp of the left ventricular apex;
B) Left apical ventriculotomy; C) Implant
of the submucosa in the LV apex. Partial suture with polypropylene 5.0
continuous suture; D) Submucosa implanted in the LV apex.
A) Partial clamp of the left ventricular apex;
B) Left apical ventriculotomy; C) Implant
of the submucosa in the LV apex. Partial suture with polypropylene 5.0
continuous suture; D) Submucosa implanted in the LV apex.Control group animals underwent mini sternotomy, pericardial opening, and subsequent
wound synthesis.
Functional Assessment
The animals underwent echocardiographic analysis at two time points: pre-surgery and
60 days after the procedure, based on the recommendations of the American Society of
Echocardiography[.The following parameters were assessed (M-mode): cardiac frequency (CF, bpm), left
ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD, mm), left ventricular end diastolic
diameter (LVEDD, mm), fractional shortening and left ventricular ejection fraction
(LVEF, %). An Agilent echocardiogram equipment (model Sonos 5500; Andover, MA, USA)
equipped with high frequency, high resolution transducers (12 MHz and 15 MHz, model
21390A, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and a capacity of 120 (Hertz)
frames per second was used.Measurements were taken in M-mode to obtain images of a transversal section of the
heart on the short axis. Diameters of the aorta, left atrium, right ventricle at end
diastole, septum, and posterior wall at end diastole were assessed. Fractional
shortening was obtained using the software provided on the equipment. The LVEF was
obtained by LVEDD cubed minus LVESD cubed divided by LVEDD cubed. All measurements
were performed three times by the same technician, who was blinded to treatment, and
mean values were recorded[.Animals were euthanized after the procedure by intraperitoneal injection of
Thiopentax (0.5 g sodium pentathol).
Histological Assessment
Hearts were removed, quickly washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Gibco, Life
Technologies, São Paulo, Brazil) and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Serial
transverse sections (8 mm) were obtained from a Leica cryostat (model 1850). Slides
were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and modified with Gomori's
trichrome for morphological assessment. Immunohistochemistry was performed with
anti-fast myosin antibody for immunofluorescence (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at a dilution
of 1:400. Slides were then incubated with secondary biotin-labeled affinity-isolated
anti-rabbit and anti-mouse immunoglobulins (LSAB® Kit, Peroxidase; DAKO
Corp., Carpinteria, CA).Antigenic recovery of monoclonal mouse anti-humanactin (smooth muscle) clone 1A4,
monoclonal mouse anti-humanvon Willebrand factor, and monoclonal mouse anti-actin
(sarcomeric) clone alpha-Sr-1 (Dako Cytomation, Denmark) was performed by enzymatic
digestion and 0.1% trypsin diluted in PBS, pH 7.4, in a 37ºC oven for one hour.H&E staining identified inflammatory responses and morphological characteristics.
Factor VIII identified endothelial cells and blood vessels, actin 1A4 identified
smooth muscle fibers and sarcomeric anti-actin indicated cardiomyocytes.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 14.0. Groups were compared
using Student's t-test for independent samples. Comparisons between pre- and
post-operative results were performed by Student's t-test for paired samples. The
condition of normality was evaluated by the Shapiro-Wilk test.
P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Weight
Between preoperative assessment and 60 days after surgery, the mean weight of the
animals in both the control and SIS groups significantly increased (from 13.2±3.6 kg
to 54.2±10.9 kg [P<0.001] and 14.3±2.1 kg to 59.6±8.8 kg
[P<0.001], respectively). Differences in mean weight were not
significantly different between groups at both pre- and post-operative time points
(P=0.456 and P=0.320, respectively) (Table 1).
Table 1
Inter- and intra-group weight analysis (kg) between pre-operative evaluation
and 60 days after surgery.
Group
n
Mean
Standard Deviation
P
Weight pre
SIS
10
14.30
2.06
Control
5
13.20
3.56
0.456
Weight pos
SIS
10
59.60
8.83
Control
5
54.20
10.94
0.320
Group
P (pre x post)
SIS
<0.001
Control
<0.001
Inter- and intra-group weight analysis (kg) between pre-operative evaluation
and 60 days after surgery.
Histology
In the macroscopic analysis, it was identified an integration between the myocardium
and SIS, not presenting a clear cleavage plane between them.Using H&E, connective tissue in the SIS and in the transition zone between the
SIS and the myocardium was identified. The presence of lymphocytes in the transition
zone between the SIS and native myocardium were also observed, suggesting signs of a
local inflammatory response to the sutures. No lymphocytic cells were identified in
the central SIS region. New muscle fibers with a single central nucleus were
identified in both the transition zone between the SIS and myocardium and the SIS
itself. Endothelial cells and newly formed blood vessels were also observed (Figure 2A/B/C/D/E/F).
Fig. 2 - A,B
Myocardium (M), transition zone between myocardium and the submucosa (ZT),
submucosa (S), H-E (hematoxylin-eosin). 20X and 40X.
Fig. 2 - C,D
Submucosa (S), blood vessels (o) and inflammatory reaction with lymphocytes
around the suture, H-E (hematoxylin-eosin). 20X and 40X.
Fig. 2 - E,F
Submucosa (S), transition zone between the myocardium and the submucosa (ZT),
muscle fiber (+) and blood vessel (o), H-E (hematoxylin-eosin). 10X and
20X.
Myocardium (M), transition zone between myocardium and the submucosa (ZT),
submucosa (S), H-E (hematoxylin-eosin). 20X and 40X.Submucosa (S), blood vessels (o) and inflammatory reaction with lymphocytes
around the suture, H-E (hematoxylin-eosin). 20X and 40X.Submucosa (S), transition zone between the myocardium and the submucosa (ZT),
muscle fiber (+) and blood vessel (o), H-E (hematoxylin-eosin). 10X and
20X.Factor VIII identified the presence of new blood vessels in both the transition zone
between the SIS and myocardium and the SIS (Figure
2G/H). Actin 1A4 identified smooth muscle fibers in the walls of the blood
vessels marked by factor VIII. Actin 1A4 negatively stained muscle fibers in the
implanted SIS (Figure 2I/J/K).
Fig. 2 - G,H
Submucosa (S), endothelial cells and blood vessels(●). Factor VIII, 40X
and 100X.
Fig. 2 - I
Submucosa (S), smooth muscle fiber (λ), muscle fiber negative for actin 1A4 (+)
and blood vessels (o). Actin 1A4, 40X.
Fig. 2 - J,K
Submucosa (S), blood vessels (o), smooth muscle fiber (λ) and muscle fiber
negative for actin 1A4 (+). Actin 1A4, 40X.
Sarcomeric anti actin antibody positively marked new cardiomyocytes in both the
transition zone as well as in the implanted SIS (Figure 2L/M).
Submucosa (S), endothelial cells and blood vessels(●). Factor VIII, 40X
and 100X.Submucosa (S), smooth muscle fiber (λ), muscle fiber negative for actin 1A4 (+)
and blood vessels (o). Actin 1A4, 40X.Submucosa (S), blood vessels (o), smooth muscle fiber (λ) and muscle fiber
negative for actin 1A4 (+). Actin 1A4, 40X.Submucosa (S). Cardiomyocyte positively marked (■). Sarcomeric
anti-actin, 10X and 40X.
Echocardiography
The SIS and control groups had similar mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
at the preoperative assessment (68.18±7.7% vs. 68.43±2.9%,
P=0.944). At the post-implant assessment, mean LVEF were also
similar (73.78±9.6% vs. 71.55±3.4%, P=0.628).
Intra-group assessment identified a variation from 68.18±7.7% to 73.78±9.6%
(P=0.240) in the SIS group between the preoperative period and 60
days after surgery. In the control group for the same time period, a variation of
68.43±2.9% to 71.55±3.4% (P=0.262) was observed (Table 2).
Table 2
Inter- and intra-group left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) analysis (%)
between pre-operative evaluation and 60 days after surgery.
Group
n
Mean
Standard Deviation
P
EF pre
SIS
10
68.18
7.67
Control
5
68.43
2.92
0.944
EF pos
SIS
10
73.78
9.60
Control
5
71.55
3.43
0.628
Group
P (pre x post)
SIS
0.240
Control
0.262
SIS - Porcine small intestinal submucosa
Inter- and intra-group left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) analysis (%)
between pre-operative evaluation and 60 days after surgery.SIS - Porcine small intestinal submucosaIn the SIS and control groups, preoperative mean left ventricular end systolic
diameter (LVESD) were 23.95±2.7 mm and 22.4±2.6 mm, respectively
(P=0.313). In post-operative assessment, mean LVESDs were 30±5.6 mm
in the SIS group and 28.2±3.3 mm in the control group (P=0.522).
Increases from 23.95±2.7 mm to 30±5.6 mm (P=0.005) in the SIS group
and 22.4±2.6 mm to 28.2±3.3 mm (P=0.004) in the control group were
identified between pre- and post-operative time periods (Table 3).
Table 3
Inter- and intra-group left ventricular end systolic diameter analysis (mm)
between pre-operative evaluation and 60 days after surgery.
Group
n
Mean
Standard Deviation
P
LVESD pre
SIS
10
23.95
2.73
Control
5
22.40
2.61
0.313
LVESD post
SIS
10
30.00
5.60
Control
5
28.20
3.27
0.522
Group
P (pre x post)
SIS
0.005
Control
0.004
LVESD - Left ventricular end systolic diameter; SIS - Porcine small
intestinal submucosa
Inter- and intra-group left ventricular end systolic diameter analysis (mm)
between pre-operative evaluation and 60 days after surgery.LVESD - Left ventricular end systolic diameter; SIS - Porcine small
intestinal submucosaWith respect to end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) inter-group preoperative assessment
identified mean values of 36.43±3.2 mm in the SIS group and 33.2±3.1 mm in the
control group (P=0.118). In post-operative assessment, 48.4±7.5 mm
was observed in the SIS group and 44.8±3.3 mm in the control group
(P=0.333). In intra-group analysis between the pre- and
post-operative periods, we identified an increase in LVEDD in both the SIS and
control groups (36.43±3.2 mm to 48.4±7.5 mm [P<0.001] and
33.2±3.1 mm to 44.8±3.3 mm [P<0.001], respectively) (Table 4).
Table 4
Inter- and intra-group left ventricular end diastolic diameter analysis (mm)
between pre-operative evaluation and 60 days after surgery.
Group
n
Mean
Standard Deviation
P
LVEDD pre
SIS
10
36.43
3.20
Control
5
33.20
4.15
0.118
LVEDD post
SIS
10
48.40
7.53
Control
5
44.80
3.35
0.333
Group
P (pre x post)
SIS
<0.001
Control
<0.001
LVEDD - Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter; SIS - Porcine small
intestinal submucosa
Inter- and intra-group left ventricular end diastolic diameter analysis (mm)
between pre-operative evaluation and 60 days after surgery.LVEDD - Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter; SIS - Porcine small
intestinal submucosa
DISCUSSION
The aim of many clinical and experimental studies is to find ideal materials with all of
the fundamental characteristics of biocompatibility. SIS has demonstrated superior
results to other collagen-based materials due to its three-dimensional structure and the
presence of growth factors and structural proteins, such as glycoproteins and
proteoglycans. The combination of these factors promotes migration, cellular matrix
interaction, cell differentiation and growth, which are all essential processes for
tissue regeneration[.Decellularized matrices in an injectable form such as a gel have been utilized with the
intent to impede progression of cardiac failure after myocardial infarction. These
matrices can originate from the intestinal submucosa, as suggested by Chiu &
Radisic[, or even from the
pericardium, as Seif-Naraghi et al.[ suggested. However, Singelyn et al.[ confirmed that although synthetic material has the
capacity to allow neoangiogenesis due to its porous structure, it is not a bioactive
substitute for damaged myocardium and does not allow for effective integration between
the injected material and the integral myocardium.The fundamental objective of an injectable biomaterial for post infarction cardiac
repair is to form an in situ graft for cellular colonization and to consequently reduce
left ventricular wall tension and theoretically stabilize ventricular remodeling.
However, these traits were not identified in studies of stem cell injection in the bone
marrow[ or submucosa
utilization in a gel form[.
Implants made of injectable biomaterial may not have the same capacity to reverse
ventricular remodeling given that its action is regional and does not affect the
integral myocardium despite some degree of benefit.Synergic effects between growth factors can increase biological effects beyond that of a
single isolated factor. The capacity of injectable material to promote effects, such as
cell adhesion and migration, in infarction healing can improve the therapeutic response.
Components of the SIS include proteoglycans, glycosominoglycans, collagen, fibronectin,
vascular growth factors, and fibroblasts. These natural components can promote
interactions between host cells and the injected material, creating multiple cellular
adhesions[.One example of catheter access is stem cell injection, which has been utilized in the
peripheral venous system, the intra-coronary venous sinus, and intramuscular endocavity.
However, this therapy in not favorable in some cases due to the manner in which the
cells are transported to the myocardium. Nakamuta et al.[ performed a study comparing several forms of stem cell
injection into the myocardium and found intramuscular injection to be more efficient.
Injection with a fibrin sealant presented an even greater increase in potentiality.
Several articles have reported that cellular loss in a single intramuscular injection
can be more than 80%, and thus injection of the greatest number of cells possible is
necessary. For this reason, use of bioactive grafts is an interesting option because
there is less cellular loss and better adhesion of the graft to the host[.Although there is an increasing tendency towards use of minimally invasive procedures,
the basic causes of a disease cannot be treated using techniques with limited access at
the cost of not achieving a thorough therapeutic treatment. Another important aspect is
to define the objective of treatment using these new materials (i.e., cellular or
mechanical repair) and subsequently define the delivery method into the myocardium. In
the present study, the primary objective was mechanical repair, followed by tissue
repair.The technique used for the SIS implant in the present study followed the current
tendency of using less invasive procedures. As such, a mini-sternotomy was performed,
which can decrease morbidity and mortality given that the pig sternum provides
significant support for the animal.The SIS obtained in development of this study was from the Landrace species, and the
animals utilized were from the same species. Although the procedure was not autologous,
the use of grafts in animals of the same species reduces susceptibility to immunological
responses, despite that fact that many researchers have suggested that the SIS is
immunogenic[.Immunogenicity is of fundamental importance in using xenogenic grafts. As previously
noted, the majority of researchers affirm that SIS is acellular and does not carry
immunological information. However, Zhang et al.[ showed that the SIS presents with porcine characteristics even
after decellularization and sterilization based on PCR identification of pig DNA on
submucosal plaque after skin implantation, which can trigger a local inflammatory
response. These data were obtained after SIS implantation in the rotator cuff in mice
and rabbits and calls into question other studies that have suggested the opposite.
However, identification of a pig gene on the transplanted membrane and the presence of
an inflammatory response can be explained. Tissues that carry DNA and are supposedly
non-immunogenic, even without containing whole cells or leftover DNA in acellular
tissue, are capable of inducing an innate immune response (inflammatory). Zhang et
al.[ suggested this
hypothesis given that mastocytes and lymphocytes were identified in the receptor
regions. The lesion itself in these animal models could have triggered the inflammatory
process.In the present study, we identified lymphocytic cells by H&E at the site of the
implant, indicating an inflammatory reaction. These cells were next to the suture line
that grafted the SIS to native myocardium (in the transition zone). This reaction could
have been triggered by a granuloma response to foreign bodies by the suture and not by
the SIS. No lymphocytes were identified in the central region of implanted SIS.Morphological analysis of the SIS using H&E identified new blood vessels and fibers
with muscular characteristics (a central single nucleus suggestive of cardiac muscle).
This was confirmed by negative actin 1A4 staining of the muscle fibers adjacent to the
myocardium and positive specific staining with the sarcomeric anti-actin antibody,
corroborating development of new cardiomyocytes.Factor VIII, which identified endothelial cells and blood vessels, positively stained
cells in the SIS, confirming the capacity of the membrane to form new vessels. These
vessels were identified both in the transition zone between the SIS and the myocardium
and in the internal portion of the implanted membrane.Actin 1A4 staining, which is specific for smooth muscle fibers, identified muscle fibers
in blood vessel walls, while muscle fibers were negatively stained in the region
adjacent to the SIS. This suggests that these were not smooth muscle fibers. Because
they morphologically presented with a single central nucleus, we can infer that the
fibers were striated, or cardiomyocytes.The sarcomeric anti-actin antibody positively stained muscle fibers in both the
transition zone and the SIS, effectively confirming the presence of new
cardiomyocytes.The presence of new blood vessels, new smooth muscle fibers, and cardiomyocytes in both
the transition zone and the body of the SIS suggests angiomuscular regeneration and
supports the hypothesis of cardiac tissue regeneration.Evidence of new cardiomyocytes was supported by three points: anti sarcomeric antibody
staining (specific for cardiomyocytes), morphological characteristics of the muscle
fibers with H&E (central single nucleus), and negative staining with the actin 1A4
antibody.One hypothesis regarding substitution of the extracellular matrix by host tissue, as
suggested in some articles, states that a combination of cartilaginous tissue, fibrotic
connective tissue, and adipose tissue is present in addition to cardiomyocytes and blood
vessels. The presence of connective collagen in these studies was not unexpected given
that it is well established that damaged or absent adult myocardial tissue can be
substituted by scar tissue. However, according to Badylak et al.[, simultaneous presence of other tissue
types, including adipose, connective and cartilaginous tissue should not occur. Neither
cartilaginous nor adipose tissue were identified in the implanted SIS in the present
study, only loose connective tissue.Upon macroscopic analysis, a suture was identified in the middle of the thickened tissue
after implant of the SIS. This wire used to perform the implant was situated on the
external surface of the myocardium above the epicardium, indicating integration of the
membrane with the myocardium as suggested by Cayan et al.[.The manner in which these cells colonized the implanted SIS could have been a
consequence of direct colonization of the submucosal edge, which was in direct contact
with the myocardium. Growth factors such as VEGF may have stimulated development of
endothelial cells, which are precursors of blood vessels, to consequently generate new
blood vessels. Development of new cardiomyocytes could be explained by the fact that
cardiac resident cells, also called cardiac stem cells, may have undergone hyperplasia
and, under the stimuli of growth factors such as PDGF and fibrinectin to recruit host
cells, proliferated toward the membrane.Stimulus from neoangiogenesis may be another explanation for cardiomyocyte formation in
the transition zone. Growth factors in the SIS could have stimulated proliferation of
cardiac cells that colonized on the SIS toward the extremities and the center of the
membrane.One important detail was thickening of the SIS observed at the time of euthanasia
without calcification, suggesting bioactivity. In other words, the membrane grew
together with the heart, integrating with the host tissue.Echocardiographic functional analysis showed that SIS and control groups were similar
with respect to LVESD, LVEDD, and LVEF in both the pre-and post-operative periods. These
data are comparable with each other without methodological bias. The SIS implanted after
left ventriculotomy did not cause deterioration of cardiac function or ventricular
remodeling.Within groups, there was an increase in left ventricular end systolic and diastolic
diameters between the pre implant period and 60 days after the procedure, although the
LVEF was maintained. This could be a result of animal growth given that weight increased
significantly after 60 days. It is important to point out that the two groups presented
gains proportional to their weight.Although in the present study we did not identify functional improvement in the SIS
group, the proposed experimental model did not present ventricular dysfunction and
showed development of new vessels in the transition zone. Thus, we demonstrated improved
vascularization of this tissue in support of the hypothesis of Lionetti et
al.[. These authors defend
the theory that the autocrine and paracrine mechanisms, mediated by factors released by
resident cells, perform essential roles in the repair process following heart failure.
Such signs can influence the function of cardiac stem cells through several mechanisms,
including survival of cardiomyocytes and neogenesis. In addition to promoting
cytoprotection and angionesis, paracrine factors released by resident cardiac cells can
alter cardiac and local extracellular matrix metabolism, interfering in post lesion
favorable remodeling. Intracellular signs may be activated and modulated temporally and
spatially with several effects in general, depending on the microenvironment as a result
of the alteration in the lesioned myocardium. Chemical, mechanical or genetic activation
of cardiac cells has been demonstrated to release peptides that protect the tissue
against ischemic lesions. These mechanisms can help in the process of supplying specific
proteins produced by these cells for new pharmacological therapy in cardiac
regeneration. Although medication-based therapy to treat heart failure can lead to
better cardiac function, it cannot induce tissue repair or regeneration.Angiogenesis is fundamental for vascular supply to the grafted tissue in formation.
Proliferation and migration of endothelial cells induced by chemotactic factors present
in the extracellular matrix and adjacent cells promotes neoangiogenesis[. These endothelial cells give origin to vascular tubes, stems and
capillaries. This process occurs in the first weeks (2-6 weeks) after the graft implant.
In the present study, we identified cell groupings stained in the graft and formation of
new blood vessels morphologically characterized by H&E and specifically marked by
factor VIII and smooth muscle fibers stained by the 1A4 antibody on the neovessel wall
in the SIS.A contractile graft was proposed by Hata et al.[ using fetal cardiomyocyte cultures in the SIS. However, this
technique can transfer the immunogenicity of fetal cardiomyocytes, which may interfere
in the colonization process of the host tissue in the short and long term and can
present the same collateral effects as synthetic grafts. The ideal mechanism for
contractile graft formation is development by the organism's own muscle fibers.Although Dar et al.[ cultivated
cardiac cells in an alginate membrane, it was not possible to stimulate formation of new
cardiomyocytes. In contrast, Matsubayashi et al.[ performed cell culture in vascular smooth muscle of the aorta in
rats on sponge polymer plates reinforced with poly-L lactic acid for two weeks and
observed tissue formation. The use of cardiomyocytes in some types of culture does not
yield positive results, as shown by Guarita-Souza et al.[ who reported that differentiated cells significantly
reduced their capacity for hyperplasia, contrary to fetal cardiomyocytes, smooth and
skeletal muscle cells.The choice of the left ventriculotomy in the present study originated from Nakamuta et
al.[, in which an
experimental model of a lesion in the right ventricle implanted with SIS is described.
There was doubt as to the membrane's resistance when implanted into a system with
greater pressure. From a mechanical and cellular repair standpoint, the authors
identified 70% recovery in contractile force of muscular fibers formed on the SIS and
identified not only muscular and blood vessels, but also cartilage, fibrotic and adipose
tissue. In the present study, we identified endothelial cells, blood vessels and
cardiomyocytes in the transition zone and in the body of the SIS, however, cartilaginous
cells were not observed.With respect to tissue resistance of the SIS, left ventricular pressure in both the
immediate and late post-operative periods was maintained. A double layer of membrane
could have aided in the process. Long term resistance was satisfactory given that while
the SIS was differentiating through angiomuscular regeneration, it was integrating with
the adjacent myocardium and creating greater adherence and resistance.Another reason for using a left ventriculotomy and SIS implant was the lack of studies
using this experimental model (integral myocardium without infarction or induced
myocardiopathy). The aim of this study was to perform mechanical repair and subsequently
assess the capacity of cellular regeneration in the transition zones between the SIS and
myocardium. In models using myocardial infarction, fibrosis impedes direct contact with
the myocardium and can block access to growth factors. Some authors may have prioritized
utilizing the extracellular matrix in a gel form because this type of graft can remain
between layers with fibrosis.Design of the present study with only two groups was based on the fact that SIS
implanted in the left ventricle has not been previously described in the literature, and
therefore we do not have initial results to compare with other types of grafts. The
inclusion of a control group without intervention in the myocardium was supported by the
fact that if we had performed left ventriculotomy and subsequent suture of the
ventricular apex, we may have induced fibrosis, which could have interfered in
comparison with the study group and created a methodological bias. We would have been
comparing the SIS group with fibrosis rather than native myocardium. A third group with
PTFE and/or bovine pericardium was not proposed because the aim was to define what would
happen using SIS implanted in the left ventricle and not to define which graft was
better.It is important to differentiate experimental animal models of myocardial infarct from
transmural myocardial infarction given that several studies have reported the use of
submucosa injection in a gel form for myocardial infarct without identification of
compromise in the ventricular wall. Physiopathologically, the behavior of the two models
is different from a tissue repair standpoint. Infarction models with thick myocardium
have better regeneration potential because cardiomyocytes are stunned and could benefit
from neoangiogenesis induced by the SIS itself, which has been shown in similar studies
using mononuclear stem cells. However, transmural infarction presents a thin ventricular
wall without cardiomyocytes, and thus the repair mechanism by the graft should be
mechanical and not cellular.With respect to post left ventriculotomy assessment, it is important to confirm
preservation of cardiac contractile function even after SIS implantation. There was
neither ventricular dysfunction nor remodeling despite an identified increase in
systolic and diastolic diameters.Based on these results, we suggest that the SIS can be utilized as repair in
aneurysmectomy surgery of the left ventricle and acts in two different ways: actively by
correcting a mechanical defect, reducing ventricular dilatation and minimizing
ventricular remodeling as suggested by Hsu et al.[; and passively by forming new blood vessels and muscle fibers
around the implanted membrane in the transition zone between the SIS and the integral
myocardium. These two processes could reduce late development of congestive heart
failure.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that 60 days after surgical procedure, the SIS integrated with the
myocardium and new blood vessel were formed, as well as new cardiomyocytes, suggesting a
angiomuscular regeneration.
Abbreviations, acronyms & symbols
CF
Cardiac frequency
CEUA
Committee of Ethics in Research in Animal Use of the PUCPR
H&E
Hematoxylin and Eosin
LVEF
Left ventricular ejection fraction
LVEDD
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter
LVESD
Left Ventricular End Systolic Diameter
PBS
Phosphate-buffered Saline
SIS
Porcine small intestinal submucosa
Authors' roles & responsibilities
CMGR
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; final approval of the manuscript;
conception and design of the study; implementation of operations and/or
experiments; writing of the manuscript or revising it critically for its
content
JCF
Conception and design of the study; implementation of operations and/or
experiments; writing of the manuscript or revising it critically for its
content
MO
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; statistical analysis
KATC
Final approval of the manuscript; conception and design of the study; writing
of the manuscript or revising it critically for its content
RC
Final approval of the manuscript; conception and design of the study;
implementation of operations and/or experiments
BOE
Final approval of the manuscript; writing of the manuscript or revising it
critically for its content
LFJ
Aid in surgery
CPB
Paper discussion
VFA
Aind in surgery
LN
Analysis of slides in pathological anatomy
RMM
Paper review
JRFN
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; final approval of the manuscript;
writing of the manuscript or revising it critically for its content
LCGS
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; final approval of the manuscript;
conception and design of the study; implementation of operations and/or
experiments; writing of the manuscript or revising it critically for its
content
Authors: Sonya B Seif-Naraghi; Michael A Salvatore; Pam J Schup-Magoffin; Diane P Hu; Karen L Christman Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Simone Cosmo; Julio César Francisco; Ricardo Correa da Cunha; Rafael Michel de Macedo; José Rocha Faria-Neto; Rossana Simeoni; Katherine Athayde Teixeira de Carvalho; Marcia Olandoski; Nelson Itiro Miyague; Vivian Ferreira do Amaral; Luiz César Guarita-Souza Journal: Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc Date: 2012-12
Authors: A A Kocher; M D Schuster; M J Szabolcs; S Takuma; D Burkhoff; J Wang; S Homma; N M Edwards; S Itescu Journal: Nat Med Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jay G Shake; Peter J Gruber; William A Baumgartner; Guylaine Senechal; Jennifer Meyers; J Mark Redmond; Mark F Pittenger; Bradley J Martin Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Nelson Bergonse Neto; Lianna Ferrari Jorge; Julio C Francisco; Bruna Olandoski Erbano; Barbara Evelin Gonçalves Barboza; Larissa Luvison Gomes da Silva; Marcia Olandoski; Katherine Athayde Teixeira de Carvalho; Luiz Felipe Pinho Moreira; Jose Rocha Faria Neto; Eltyeb Abdelwahid; Luiz Cesar Guarita-Souza Journal: Stem Cells Int Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 5.443