| Literature DB >> 25140090 |
Jeong Il Kang1, Yong-Nam Kim2, Hyun Choi3.
Abstract
[Purpose] We investigated the effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and cryotherapy on joint function recovery and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of patients with total knee replacement. [Subjects] Forty-six patients with total knee replacement were recruited and allocated to either low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy (n=15), cryotherapy (n=15), or a combination of both (n=16). Therapy was administered once a day, 5 times a week for 3 weeks. To determine functional joint recovery and reduction of inflammation, changes in the Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (K-WOMAC), range of motion (ROM), and CRP were assessed postsurgically and four times over a 3-week period. Using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), homogeneity tests were performed based on participants' general characteristics. To recognize changes in time-variant K-WOMAC, ROM, and CRP values between groups, repeated measures ANOVA was performed, and Tukey's test was used for post-test analysis. Values at α=0.05 were considered significant.Entities:
Keywords: C-reactive protein; Crytherapy; Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy
Year: 2014 PMID: 25140090 PMCID: PMC4135191 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.1033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
General characteristics of each group
| Group A (n=15) | Group B (n=15) | Group C (n=16) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 66.6±3.9a | 68.5±4.7 | 67.6.±3.5 |
| Height (cm) | 155.4±4.7 | 156.2±4.6 | 157.1±3.6 |
| Weight (kg) | 56.6±3.7 | 59.1±8.2 | 58.9±5.1 |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 3.8±1.3 | 3.5±1.0 | 3.9±1.2 |
| ROM (°) | 86.9±7.7 | 87.1±7.5 | 88.3±7.0 |
| K-WOMAC (points) | 74.1±3.5 | 74.3±2.7 | 73.9±1.9 |
aMean± SD. Group A: low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy group, Group B: cryotherapy group, Group C: low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy + cryotherapy group, CRP: C-reactive protein, ROM: range of motion, K-WOMAC: Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
Comparison of joint function and C-reactive protein levels among the three experimental groups
| Variable | Group | Before | 1 weeks | 2 weeks | 3 weeks | Sourceb | Post-Hocc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-WOMAC | Group A | 74.1±3.5a | 66.9±3.0 | 50.3±2.2 | 29.0±2.4 | T*** | |
| Group B | 74.3±2.7 | 66.5±2.3 | 47.5±1.9 | 29.8±1.7 | T×G* | ||
| Group C | 73.9±1.9 | 66.0±2.3 | 46.7±2.3 | 28.7±2.3 | G* | C•B>B•A | |
| ROM | Group A | 86.9±7.7 | 102.6±5.6 | 124.1±4.5 | 134.4±4.6 | T*** | |
| Group B | 87.1±7.5 | 105.8±8.0 | 124.8±3.9 | 138.1±3.5 | T×G | ||
| Group C | 88.3±7.0 | 108.6±6.1 | 126.4±5.7 | 140.2±4.4 | G** | C•B>B•A | |
| CRP | Group A | 3.8±1.3 | 3.3±1.1 | 1.8±0.8 | 0.4±0.1 | T*** | |
| Group B | 3.5±1.0 | 2.3±0.6 | 1.6±0.7 | 0.5±0.2 | T×G*** | ||
| Group C | 3.9±1.2 | 2.0±0.6 | 1.3±0.3 | 0.3±0.1 | G* | C•B>B•A |
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. aMean± SD, bRepeated ANOVA, cTukey’s test. Group A: low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy group, Group B: cryotherapy group, Group C: low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy + cryotherapy group, K-WOMAC: Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, ROM: range of motion, CRP: C-reactive protein, T: Time, T×G: Time×Group, G: Group