Literature DB >> 25139864

Human vision is attuned to the diffuseness of natural light.

Yaniv Morgenstern1, Wilson S Geisler2, Richard F Murray3.   

Abstract

All images are highly ambiguous, and to perceive 3-D scenes, the human visual system relies on assumptions about what lighting conditions are most probable. Here we show that human observers' assumptions about lighting diffuseness are well matched to the diffuseness of lighting in real-world scenes. We use a novel multidirectional photometer to measure lighting in hundreds of environments, and we find that the diffuseness of natural lighting falls in the same range as previous psychophysical estimates of the visual system's assumptions about diffuseness. We also find that natural lighting is typically directional enough to override human observers' assumption that light comes from above. Furthermore, we find that, although human performance on some tasks is worse in diffuse light, this can be largely accounted for by intrinsic task difficulty. These findings suggest that human vision is attuned to the diffuseness levels of natural lighting conditions.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffuseness; ideal observer; lighting statistics; lightness; prior

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25139864      PMCID: PMC4141658          DOI: 10.1167/14.9.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  32 in total

1.  Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties.

Authors:  Roland W Fleming; Ron O Dror; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity.

Authors:  Huseyin Boyaci; Katja Doerschner; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-08-23       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Measurements of the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness.

Authors:  Caterina Ripamonti; Marina Bloj; Robin Hauck; Mitha Kiran; Scott Greenwald; Shannon I Maloney; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Matching illumination of solid objects.

Authors:  Sylvia C Pont; Jan J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-04

7.  The human visual system's assumption that light comes from above is weak.

Authors:  Yaniv Morgenstern; Richard F Murray; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement.

Authors:  A L Gilchrist
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Depth discrimination from shading under diffuse lighting.

Authors:  M S Langer; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 10.  Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

View more
  11 in total

1.  Naturally glossy: Gloss perception, illumination statistics, and tone mapping.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Gizem Kucukoglu; Michael S Landy; Rafal K Mantiuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  To compute lightness, illumination is not estimated, it is held constant.

Authors:  Alan L Gilchrist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The visual light field in real scenes.

Authors:  Ling Xia; Sylvia C Pont; Ingrid Heynderickx
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-28

4.  Illumination discrimination in real and simulated scenes.

Authors:  Ana Radonjic; Bradley Pearce; Stacey Aston; Avery Krieger; Hilary Dubin; Nicolas P Cottaris; David H Brainard; Anya C Hurlbert
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real Scene.

Authors:  Ling Xia; Sylvia C Pont; Ingrid Heynderick
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-01-01

6.  A model of lightness perception guided by probabilistic assumptions about lighting and reflectance.

Authors:  Richard F Murray
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Hyperspectral environmental illumination maps: characterizing directional spectral variation in natural environments.

Authors:  Takuma Morimoto; Sho Kishigami; João M M Linhares; Sérgio M C Nascimento; Hannah E Smithson
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Effects of light map orientation and shape on the visual perception of canonical materials.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Huib de Ridder; Pascal Barla; Sylvia Pont
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Discrimination of spectral reflectance under environmental illumination.

Authors:  Takuma Morimoto; Hannah E Smithson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Illumination discrimination in the absence of a fixed surface-reflectance layout.

Authors:  Ana Radonjic; Xiaomao Ding; Avery Krieger; Stacey Aston; Anya C Hurlbert; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.