Literature DB >> 25139100

Glycolytic activity with 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts final neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer.

Ana María García Vicente1, Miguel Ángel Cruz Mora, Antonio Alberto León Martín, María Del Mar Muñoz Sánchez, Fernanda Relea Calatayud, Ober Van Gómez López, Ruth Espinosa Aunión, Ana Gonzalez Ageitos, Angel Soriano Castrejón.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to explore the relation between glycolytic metabolism assessed by (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and final neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) response in locally advanced breast tumors. Of women with breast cancer, 126 were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT previous to NC. Standard uptake value (SUV) max was calculated in the primary tumor. After NC, residual primary tumor specimen was histopathologically classified according to Miller and Payne tumor regression grades (TRG), from G1 to G5 and in response groups as good responders (G4 or G5), partial responders (G2 or G3), and non-responders (G1). Furthermore, residual lesions were classified following a binary assessment as responders (G4 or G5) and non-responders (the rest of cases). The relationship between SUV max with TRG and response groups was evaluated. Of tumors, 127 were assessed (a patient had bilateral breast lesions). TRG were as follows: G1 (27), G2 (27), G3 (32), G4 (11), and G5 (30). Forty-one were classified as good responders, 59 as partial responders, and 27 as non-responders. For the binary assessment, 41 lesions were classified as responders and 86 as non-responders. We found statistical differences (p=0.02) between the mean SUV max and TRG with greater SUV values for G5 compared to the other TRG. Good responders showed greater mean SUV max ± SD compared to partial responders and non-responders (10.51 ± 6.64 for good responders, 6.94 ± 5.81 for partial responders, and 5.23 ± 2.76 for non-responders; p=0.001). Baseline tumor metabolism assessing by FDG PET/CT was associated with the final histopathologic status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with greater SUV max values for good responders compared to the less responder cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25139100     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2495-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  27 in total

1.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography optimizes neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer to achieve pathological complete response.

Authors:  Shigeto Ueda; Toshiaki Saeki; Takashi Shigekawa; Jiro Omata; Tomoyuki Moriya; Junji Yamamoto; Akihiko Osaki; Nobuko Fujiuchi; Misono Misumi; Hideki Takeuchi; Takaki Sakurai; Hitoshi Tsuda; Katsumi Tamura; Jiro Ishida; Yoshiyuki Abe; Etsuko Imabayashi; Ichiei Kuji; Hiroshi Matsuda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  [Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-FDG. PET Working Group. Procedures Committee of the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine].

Authors:  J R García Garzón; A Rodríguez; A Cabrera
Journal:  Rev Esp Med Nucl       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

3.  Monitoring primary breast cancer throughout chemotherapy using FDG-PET.

Authors:  Garry M McDermott; Andrew Welch; Roger T Staff; Fiona J Gilbert; Lutz Schweiger; Scott I K Semple; Tim A D Smith; Andrew W Hutcheon; Iain D Miller; Ian C Smith; Steven D Heys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Predictive value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy failure in breast cancer using FDG-PET after the first course.

Authors:  Hélène Kolesnikov-Gauthier; Laurence Vanlemmens; Marie-Christine Baranzelli; Philippe Vennin; Véronique Servent; Charles Fournier; Philippe Carpentier; Jacques Bonneterre
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Kristine Broglio; Shu-Wan Kau; Massimo Cristofanilli; Aman U Buzdar; Vicente Valero; Thomas Buchholz; Funda Meric; Lavinia Middleton; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Added value of baseline 18F-FDG uptake in serial 18F-FDG PET for evaluation of response of solid extracerebral tumors to systemic cytotoxic neoadjuvant treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henriëtte M E Quarles van Ufford; Harm van Tinteren; Sigrid G Stroobants; Ingrid I Riphagen; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27.

Authors:  Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Roy E Smith; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Ann M Brown; Andre Robidoux; Richard Margolese; Morton S Kahlenberg; Soonmyung Paik; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer: relationship to response to therapy.

Authors:  David A Mankoff; Lisa K Dunnwald; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Aaron Charlop; Thomas J Lawton; Erin K Schubert; Jeffrey Tseng; Robert B Livingston
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy.

Authors:  I C Smith; A E Welch; A W Hutcheon; I D Miller; S Payne; F Chilcott; S Waikar; T Whitaker; A K Ah-See; O Eremin; S D Heys; F J Gilbert; P F Sharp
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Koosha Paydary; Siavash Mehdizadeh Seraj; Mahdi Zirakchian Zadeh; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Sara Pourhassan Shamchi; Saeid Gholami; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by Dual Time Point [18F]FDG PET/CT in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Relation with Tumor Biology.

Authors:  Ana María Garcia-Vicente; Julián Pérez-Beteta; Víctor Manuel Pérez-García; David Molina; German Andrés Jiménez-Londoño; Angel Soriano-Castrejón; Alicia Martínez-González
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Stefanie Avril; Raymond F Muzic; Donna Plecha; Bryan J Traughber; Shaveta Vinayak; Norbert Avril
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  GlucoCEST MRI for the Evaluation Response to Chemotherapeutic and Metabolic Treatments in a Murine Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Comparison with[18F]F-FDG-PET.

Authors:  Martina Capozza; Annasofia Anemone; Chetan Dhakan; Melania Della Peruta; Martina Bracesco; Sara Zullino; Daisy Villano; Enzo Terreno; Dario Livio Longo; Silvio Aime
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Glucose is a key driver for GLUT1-mediated nanoparticles internalization in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Leonardo Venturelli; Silvia Nappini; Michela Bulfoni; Giuseppe Gianfranceschi; Simone Dal Zilio; Giovanna Coceano; Fabio Del Ben; Matteo Turetta; Giacinto Scoles; Lisa Vaccari; Daniela Cesselli; Dan Cojoc
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three-Dimensional Positron Emission Mammography versus Whole Body Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Dong Dai; Xiuyu Song; Man Wang; Lin Li; Wenchao Ma; Wengui Xu; Yunchuan Ma; Juntian Liu; Jin Zhang; Peifang Liu; Xiaoyue Gu; Yusheng Su
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Prediction of Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival by the 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomic Features in Patients with Primary Gastric Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Xue-Lei Ma; Lu-Tong Pu; Ruo-Fan Zhou; Xue-Jin Ou; Rong Tian
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.161

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.