Literature DB >> 25138542

Bone augmentation using a synthetic hydroxyapatite/silica oxide-based and a xenogenic hydroxyapatite-based bone substitute materials with and without recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.

D S Thoma1, A Kruse, C Ghayor, R E Jung, F E Weber.   

Abstract

AIM: To test whether or not bone regeneration using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) is comparable to hydroxyapatite/silica oxide (HA/SiO) and to test the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) as an adjunct to DBBM for localized bone regeneration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In each of the 10 rabbits, 4 titanium cylinders were placed on the external cortical plates of their calvaria. Four treatment modalities were randomly allocated: (i) empty, (ii) HA/SiO, (iii) DBBM, and (iv) DBBM plus rhBMP-2 (DBBM/BMP). The animals were sacrificed at week 8. Descriptive histology and histomorphometric assessment using a superimposed test grid of points and cycloids were performed.
RESULTS: The mean number of points of the test grid coinciding with bone within the cylinder reached 124 ± 35 bone points for empty controls, 92 ± 40 bone points for DBBM, 98 ± 44 bone points for synthetic HA/SiO, and 146 ± 34 bone points DBBM/BMP. The P-value for DBBM with and without BMP reached a borderline statistical significance of 0.051. However, the area of bone regeneration within the cylinders peaked for DBBM/BMP and was statistically significantly higher compared with empty cylinders (P < 0.05). The bone-to-bone substitute contact ranged between 32.9% ± 21.7 for DBBM, 39.6 ± 18.4% for HA/SiO, and 57.8% ± 10.2 for DBBM/BMP. The differences between DBBM/BMP and controls (DBBM, HA/SiO) were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: DBBM and HA/SiO rendered comparable amounts of bone regeneration. The addition of rhBMP-2 to DBBM resulted in more favorable outcomes with respect to the area of bone regeneration and to bone-to-implant contact, thereby indicating the potential of this growth factor to enhance bone regeneration within this animal model.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone augmentation; bone substitute material; nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25138542     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  3 in total

1.  Repair of Critical Size Bone Defects Using Synthetic Hydroxyapatite or Xenograft with or without the Bone Marrow Mononuclear Fraction: A Histomorphometric and Immunohistochemical Study in Rat Calvaria.

Authors:  Jorge Luís da Silva Pires; Jorge José de Carvalho; Mario José Dos Santos Pereira; Igor da Silva Brum; Ana Lucia Rosa Nascimento; Paulo Gonçalo Pinto Dos Santos; Lucio Frigo; Ricardo Guimaraes Fischer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 2.  Animal models of vertical bone augmentation (Review).

Authors:  Zepeng Zhang; Yaxin Gan; Yarong Guo; Xuguang Lu; Xianqi Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Cellular responses to deproteinized bovine bone mineral biofunctionalized with bone-conditioned medium.

Authors:  Ludovica Parisi; Daniel Buser; Vivianne Chappuis; Maria B Asparuhova
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.573

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.