| Literature DB >> 25136686 |
Meili Gao1, Yongfei Li2, Aqun Zheng3, Xiaochang Xue4, Lan Chen5, Yu Kong1.
Abstract
We investigated oxidative stress/genotoxic effects levels, immunoglobulin levels, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) levels exposed in 126 coke oven workers and in 78 control subjects, and evaluated the association between oxidative stress/genotoxic effects levels and immunoglobulin levels. Significant differences were observed in biomarkers, including 1-hydroxypyrene levels, employment time, percentages of alcohol drinkers, MDA, 8-OHdG levels, CTL levels and CTM, MN, CA frequency, and IgG, IgA levels between the control and exposed groups. Slightly higher 1-OHP levels in smoking users were observed. For the dose-response relationship of IgG, IgA, IgM, and IgE by 1-OHP, each one percentage increase in urinary 1-OHP generates a 0.109%, 0.472%, 0.051%, and 0.067% decrease in control group and generates a 0.312%, 0.538%, 0.062%, and 0.071% decrease in exposed group, respectively. Except for age, alcohol and smoking status, IgM, and IgE, a significant correlation in urinary 1-OHP and other biomarkers in the total population was observed. Additionally, a significant negative correlation in genotoxic/oxidative damage biomarkers of MDA, 8-OH-dG, CTL levels, and immunoglobins of IgG and IgA levels, especially in coke oven workers, was found. These data suggest that oxidative stress/DNA damage induced by PAHs may play a role in toxic responses for PAHs in immunological functions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25136686 PMCID: PMC4129152 DOI: 10.1155/2014/801346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Demographic characteristics of workers in the control and exposed groups.
| Variables | Control group (78) | Exposed group (126) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-OHP ( | 0.55 ± 0.28 | 9.36 ± 2.14∗∗∗ | <0.001a |
| Age (year) | 32.4 ± 4.9 | 33.6 ± 5.2 | 0.103a |
| Employment time (year) | 12.7 ± 2.5 | 14.1 ± 2.7∗∗∗ | <0.001a |
| Current smokers, yes (%) | 41 (52.6%) | 79 (62.7%) | 0.153b |
| Alcohol users, yes (%) | 18 (23.1%) | 57 (45.2%) | 0.001b |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 1.23 ± 0.37 | 1.97 ± 0.61∗∗∗ | <0.001a |
| 8-OH-dG (nmol/mol creatinine) | 1.29 ± 0.15 | 2.20 ± 0.19∗∗∗ | <0.001a |
| CTL ( | 3.16 ± 0.58 | 7.49 ± 0.89∗∗∗ | <0.001a |
| CTM | 0.85 ± 0.23 | 10.48 ± 3.52∗∗∗ | <0.001a |
| MN (‰) | 1.83 ± 0.51 | 2.78 ± 0.63∗∗∗ | <0.001a |
| CA (N, AR%) | 10, 12.8% | 36, 28.6% | 0.009b |
| IgG (g/L) | 0.36 ± 0.11 | 0.12 ± 0.03∗∗∗ | <0.001a |
| IgA (g/L) | 2.09 ± 0.44 | 1.66 ± 0.44∗∗∗ | <0.001a |
| IgM (g/L) | 1.76 ± 0.69 | 1.62 ± 0.72 | 0.172a |
| IgE (IU/mL) | 173.90 ± 30.24 | 167.76 ± 43.16 | 0.273a |
1-OHP: 1-hydroxypyrene; CTL: comet tail length; CTM: comet tail moment; MN: micronucleus; CA: chromosomal aberrations. Values are shown mean ± SD except where indicated. awhen compared with control by Mann-Whitney test, bwhen compared with control by chi-square test.
***P < 0.001.
1-OHP levels by smoking use status in control and exposed group.
| Control group | Exposed group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking (No) | Smoking (yes) | Smoking (No) | Smoking (yes) | |
|
| 37 | 41 | 47 | 79 |
| 1-OHP level | 0.48 ± 0.21 | 0.57 ± 0.31 | 8.62 ± 2.12 | 9.58 ± 3.65 |
|
| 0.142 | 0.096 | ||
awhen compared between nonsmoking and smoking users control and exposed group by chi-square test.
Dose-response relationship with the levels of 1-OHP with immunoglobins.
| 1-OHP level | IgG (g/L) | IgA (g/L) | IgM (g/L) | IgE (IU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Control group | −0.109 | −0.472 | −0.051 | −0.067 |
| (−0.359–0.130) | (−0.438–0.296) | (−0.445–0.283) | (−0.941–0.518) | |
| 0.353 | <0.001 | 0.658 | 0.565 | |
|
| ||||
| Exposed group | −0.312 | −0.538 | −0.062 | −0.071 |
| (−0.3455–0.176) | (−0.463–0.211) | (−0.903–0.465) | (−0.233–0.098) | |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.592 | 0.420 | |
Correlations of 1-OHP levels and the other studied variables in total subjects.
| Variables |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 0.157 | 0.233a |
| Employment time (year) | 0.455 | <0.001a |
| Current smokers, yes (%) | 0.329 | 0.073b |
| Alcohol users, yes (%) | 0.165 | 0.209b |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 0.623 | <0.001a |
| 8-OH-dG (nmol/mol creatinine) | 0.668 | <0.001a |
| CTL ( | 0.571 | <0.001a |
| CTM | 0.682 | <0.001a |
| MN (‰) | 0.459 | <0.001a |
| CA (N, AR%) | 0.422 | 0.009b |
| IgG (g/L) | −0.732 | <0.001a |
| IgA (g/L) | −0.677 | <0.001a |
| IgM (g/L) | −0.209 | 0.127a |
| IgE (IU/mL) | −0.187 | 0.211a |
aSpearman rank correlation coefficient. bSpearman rank correlation coefficient for the comparisons between each of the studied variables.
Figure 1Correlation between MDA level and 8-OH-dG level in lymphocytes of workers in control group ((a), r = 0.556, P < 0.001) and exposed group ((b), r = 0.640, P < 0.001), and correlation between 8-OH-dG and CTL level in lymphocytes of workers in control group ((c), r = 0.644, P < 0.001) and exposed group ((d), r = 0.794, P < 0.001).
Figure 2Correlation between MDA and IgG, IgA level in lymphocytes of workers in control group ((a), r = −0.498, P < 0.001; (c), r = −0.363, P = 0.001) and exposed group ((b), r = −0.606, P < 0.001; (d), r = −0.814, P < 0.001), respectively; correlation between 8-OH-dG and IgG, IgA level in lymphocytes of workers in control group ((e), r = −0.229, P = 0.004; (g), r = −0.080, P = 0.486) and exposed group ((f), r = −0.405, P < 0.001; (h), r = −0.523, P < 0.001), respectively; correlation between CTL and IgG, IgA level in lymphocytes of workers in control group ((i), r = −0.126, P = 0.270; (k), r = −0.110, P = 0.339) and exposed group ((j), r = −0.312, P < 0.001; (l), r = −0.350, P < 0.001), respectively.