Literature DB >> 25136534

Expected efficacy of HPV vaccine in prevention of cervix cancer in Thailand.

Beuy Joob1, Viroj Wiwanitkit2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25136534      PMCID: PMC4134618          DOI: 10.4103/2278-330X.136821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Asian J Cancer        ISSN: 2278-330X


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The HPV vaccine is the first human cancer vaccine. It is recommended as the primary prevention for cervix cancer.[1] It was mentioned the available HPV vaccine is safe and “HPV vaccination will result in approximately 70% reduction of cervical cancers.[2]” In Thailand, the HPV vaccine is presently available and recommended for sexually active females. In fact, the trial of the HPV before official launch was performed in several setting including Thailand.[3] However, the vaccination is presently not successfully and there are many obstacles. The big problem is due to the cost of vaccine. According to the report by Songthap et al., “willingness to pay was relatively low.[4]” Nevertheless, Termrungruanglert et al., found that the HPV vaccine was cost-effective in Thailand.[5] An interesting remained question is still left for the efficacy of the vaccine in each individual. As already noted, the reduction of cancer can be expected in only seven-tenths of all cases and the protection is HPV-type specific. The present vaccine covers only 4 HPV types (6,11,16,18). Here, the authors tried to estimated expected efficacy of vaccine in each individual. According to the previous study on HPV type in Thai females with cervix cancer, only 71% of the patients had the HPV in either one of the mentioned 4 HPV types (6, 11, 16, 18).[6] Based on basic probability principle, the efficacy of vaccine for protection of an individual should be equal to “0.7 × 0.71 = 0.497.” This means less than half of vaccinated females can be expected for successful prevention. In fact, there are also other factors that can also decreased the protective ability of the vaccine such as the vaccination technique, complication to vaccination program, etc. As Henderson et al., noted, “clearer information is needed concerning the incomplete protection offered by the vaccine, and that cervical screening will still be required.[7]”
  7 in total

1.  Cost and effectiveness evaluation of prophylactic HPV vaccine in developing countries.

Authors:  Wichai Termrungruanglert; Piyalamporn Havanond; Nipon Khemapech; Somrat Lertmaharit; Sathirakorn Pongpanich; Chonlakiet Khorprasert; Surasak Taneepanichskul
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Teeraporn Chinchai; Jira Chansaenroj; Sukumarn Swangvaree; Pairoj Junyangdikul; Yong Poovorawan
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Human papillomavirus, vaccines, and protection from cervical cancer.

Authors:  Sadiman K Altinbas; Omer L Tapisiz
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 4.  Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines as an option for preventing cervical malignancies: (how) effective and safe?

Authors:  Lucija Tomljenovic; Jean Pierre Spinosa; Christopher A Shaw
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine in women aged 24-45 years: a randomised, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Nubia Muñoz; Ricardo Manalastas; Punee Pitisuttithum; Damrong Tresukosol; Joseph Monsonego; Kevin Ault; Christine Clavel; Joaquin Luna; Evan Myers; Sara Hood; Oliver Bautista; Janine Bryan; Frank J Taddeo; Mark T Esser; Scott Vuocolo; Richard M Haupt; Eliav Barr; Alfred Saah
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of a human papilloma virus vaccine among students, parents and teachers in Thailand.

Authors:  Archin Songthap; Punnee Pitisuttithum; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; Wijitr Fungladda; Valai Bussaratid
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.267

7.  'A false sense of security'? Understanding the role of the HPV vaccine on future cervical screening behaviour: a qualitative study of UK parents and girls of vaccination age.

Authors:  Lorna Henderson; Alison Clements; Sarah Damery; Clare Wilkinson; Joan Austoker; Sue Wilson
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.136

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Limitations of cytological cervical cancer screening (Papanicolaou test) regarding technical and cultural aspect in rural India.

Authors:  Dhiraj B Nikumbh; Roopali D Nikumbh; Shivraj N Kanthikar
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.