Literature DB >> 19493565

Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine in women aged 24-45 years: a randomised, double-blind trial.

Nubia Muñoz1, Ricardo Manalastas, Punee Pitisuttithum, Damrong Tresukosol, Joseph Monsonego, Kevin Ault, Christine Clavel, Joaquin Luna, Evan Myers, Sara Hood, Oliver Bautista, Janine Bryan, Frank J Taddeo, Mark T Esser, Scott Vuocolo, Richard M Haupt, Eliav Barr, Alfred Saah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the peak incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection occurs in most populations within 5-10 years of first sexual experience, all women remain at risk for acquisition of HPV infections. We tested the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the quadrivalent HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) L1 virus-like-particle vaccine in women aged 24-45 years.
METHODS: Women aged 24-45 years with no history of genital warts or cervical disease were enrolled from community health centres, academic health centres, and primary health-care providers into an ongoing multicentre, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Participants were allocated by computer-generated schedule to receive quadrivalent HPV vaccine (n=1911) or placebo (n=1908) at day 1, and months 2 and 6. All study site investigators and personnel, study participants, monitors, and central laboratory personnel were blinded to treatment allocation. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were 6 months' or more duration of infection and cervical and external genital disease due to HPV 6, 11, 16, 18; and due to HPV 16 and 18 alone. Primary efficacy analyses were done in a per-protocol population, but intention-to-treat analyses were also undertaken. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00090220.
FINDINGS: 1910 women received at least one dose of vaccine and 1907 at least one dose of placebo. In the per-protocol population, efficacy against the first coprimary endpoint (disease or infection related to HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18) was 90.5% (95% CI 73.7-97.5, four of 1615 cases in the vaccine group vs 41/1607 in the placebo group) and 83.1% (50.6-95.8, four of 1601 cases vs 23/1579 cases) against the second coprimary endpoint (disease or infection related to HPV 16 and 18 alone). In the intention-to-treat population, efficacy against the first coprimary endpoint was 30.9% (95% CI 11.1-46.5, 108/1886 cases vs 154/1883 cases) and against the second coprimary endpoint was 22.6% (-2.9 to 41.9, 90/1886 cases vs 115/1883 cases), since infection and disease were present at baseline. We recorded no vaccine-related serious adverse events.
INTERPRETATION: The quadrivalent HPV vaccine is efficacious in women aged 24-45 years not infected with the relevant HPV types at enrolment. FUNDING: Merck (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19493565     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60691-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  148 in total

1.  Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Mohamad Farid Aziz; Uma K Devi; Hextan Y S Ngan; Joo-Hyun Nam; Seung Cheol Kim; Tomoyasu Kato; Hee Sug Ryu; Shingo Fujii; Yoon Soon Lee; Jong Hyeok Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Kung-Liahng Wang; Taek Sang Lee; Kimio Ushijima; Sang-Goo Shin; Yin Nin Chia; Sarikapan Wilailak; Sang Yoon Park; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Toshiharu Kamura; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Randomized trial of HPV4 vaccine assessing the response to HPV4 vaccine in two schedules among Peruvian female sex workers.

Authors:  Brandon Brown; Magaly Blas; Alejandra Cabral; Cesar Carcamo; Patti Gravitt; Neal Halsey
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Design considerations for liposomal vaccines: influence of formulation parameters on antibody and cell-mediated immune responses to liposome associated antigens.

Authors:  Douglas S Watson; Aaron N Endsley; Leaf Huang
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Review of Gardasil.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Stephen L Vierthaler; Jennifer A Santee
Journal:  J Vaccines Vaccin       Date:  2010-11-23

Review 5.  Lessons learned from successful human vaccines: Delineating key epitopes by dissecting the capsid proteins.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Lu Xin; Shaowei Li; Mujin Fang; Jun Zhang; Ningshao Xia; Qinjian Zhao
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Should female sex workers be offered HPV vaccination?

Authors:  Maarten F Schim van der Loeff; Alex Vorsters; Elske Marra; Pierre Van Damme; Arjan Hogewoning
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Human papillomavirus infection and reinfection in adult women: the role of sexual activity and natural immunity.

Authors:  Helen Trottier; Silvaneide Ferreira; Patricia Thomann; Maria C Costa; Joao S Sobrinho; José Carlos M Prado; Thomas E Rohan; Luisa L Villa; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Immunogenicity of Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine in Children with CKD.

Authors:  Delphine R Nelson; Alicia M Neu; Alison Abraham; Sandra Amaral; Donald Batisky; Jeffrey J Fadrowski
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Persistence of immune response to HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted cervical cancer vaccine in women aged 15-55 years.

Authors:  Tino F Schwarz; Marek Spaczynski; Achim Schneider; Jacek Wysocki; Andrzej Galaj; Karin Schulze; Sylviane M Poncelet; Gregory Catteau; Florence Thomas; Dominique Descamps
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2011-09-01

10.  Drivers and barriers to acceptance of human-papillomavirus vaccination among young women: a qualitative and quantitative study.

Authors:  Gitte Lee Mortensen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.