Literature DB >> 25136169

Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications.

Shiba Mittal1, Sachin Pardeshi1, Niranjan Mayadeo1, Janki Mane1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cesarean delivery rates over the last decade and to examine the indications contributing to changed trends, if any.
METHODS: To compare the rate and indications of cesarean delivery over the last decade, the data were collected in a retrospective manner from all the deliveries that occurred between January 1 and December 31 in 2001, 2006, and 2011, in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, a large tertiary care municipal hospital in Western India. A cohort of 20853 delivered women was studied. The rates and indications of primary and repeat cesarean sections were analyzed among the live births to estimate the relative contribution of each indication to the overall increase in rate.
RESULTS: The cesarean delivery rate increased from 171.70 to 289.30 per 1,000 live births, with an increase in primary cesarean delivery rate from 118.53 (69.03 %) in 2001 to 210.09 (72.62 %) in 2011 per 1,000 live births. Fetal distress, arrest of descent, multiple gestations, and fetal indications contributed to this increase.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant increase in the total cesarean rate with primary cesarean accounting for most of the increase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean rate; Indications; Primary cesarean birth; Repeat cesarean birth

Year:  2014        PMID: 25136169      PMCID: PMC4126949          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-013-0491-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  15 in total

1.  Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; I D Rusen; K S Joseph; Robert Liston; Michael S Kramer; Shi Wu Wen; Robert Kinch
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2004-08

Review 2.  Advanced maternal age and the risk of cesarean birth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hamideh Bayrampour; Maureen Heaman
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  [Comparison of indications for cesarean section in 1985-86 and 2000-01. Analysis of changes].

Authors:  Alina Krychowska; Katarzyna Kosińska; Anna Karwan-Płońska
Journal:  Ginekol Pol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Primary and repeat caesarean sections: comparison of indications.

Authors:  A Abu-Heija; F Zayed
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital.

Authors:  Cheryl Chong; Lin Lin Su; Arijit Biswas
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 6.  [Increased rate of Caesarean sections--causes and consequences].

Authors:  Mette Christophersen Tollånes
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2009-06-25

7.  Delivery after one previous cesarean section.

Authors:  M J Turner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Lisbet S Lundsberg; Kathleen Belanger; Christian M Pettker; Edmund F Funai; Jessica L Illuzzi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Efty P Stavrou; Jane B Ford; Antonia W Shand; Jonathan M Morris; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Cesarean delivery rates in Saudi Arabia: a ten-year review.

Authors:  Hassan S Ba'aqeel
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

View more
  5 in total

1.  Trends, Regional Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Births in India, 2010-2016.

Authors:  Christophe Z Guilmoto; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  The efficacy of TAP block versus ilioinguinal block for post-cesarean section pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tikuneh Yetneberk; Basazinew Chekol; Diriba Teshome
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-08-13

3.  Previous mode of delivery affects subsequent pregnancy outcomes: a Chinese birth register study.

Authors:  Xiaoxu Chen; Jinsong Gao; Juntao Liu; Jing Hu; Sijian Li; Yabin Tang; Mei Zhong; Jing He; Sibiu Liao; Jimmying Yang; Xiaowei Liu; Xietong Wang; Xiaohong Liu; Xinghui Liu; Yinli Cao; Tianyun Wang; Caixia Liu; Jingxia Sun
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

4.  The Health Impact of Surgical Techniques and Assistive Methods Used in Cesarean Deliveries: A Systemic Review.

Authors:  Li-Hsuan Wang; Kok-Min Seow; Li-Ru Chen; Kuo-Hu Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Combination of medical and surgical management in successful treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a case report series.

Authors:  Anda Pristavu; Angela Vinturache; Elena Mihalceanu; Radu Pintilie; Mircea Onofriescu; Demetra Socolov
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.