Literature DB >> 25134816

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement and dysplasia using computer-assisted measurements.

Jeffrey J Nepple1, John M Martell2, Young-Jo Kim3, Ira Zaltz4, Michael B Millis3, David A Podeszwa5, Daniel J Sucato5, Ernest L Sink6, John C Clohisy7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive evaluation of hip radiographs in the young adult with hip pain has become increasingly complex and time consuming. The interobserver reliability of manually performed measurements of femoroacetabular impingement, including the alpha angle, has been questioned. Methods to improve the reliability of a radiographic evaluation may increase the clinical utility of these parameters.
PURPOSE: To determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a computer-assisted radiographic analysis of the young adult hip in a clinically relevant setting. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A reliability study of a comprehensive computer-assisted radiographic evaluation was performed, which included 25 radiographic parameters of proximal femoral morphology, acetabular morphology, hip osteoarthritis, and pelvic tilt/rotation. Anteroposterior pelvis and 45° Dunn lateral radiographs of 70 consecutive patients undergoing hip preservation surgery were included. Each radiograph was analyzed by 4 experienced hip surgeons. The reliability of continuous measurements was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), while categorical parameters were analyzed using κ values and percentages of agreement.
RESULTS: The interobserver reliability of the parameters of proximal femoral morphology, acetabular morphology, and osteoarthritis was generally substantial to excellent. Parameters with lesser interobserver reliability included the alpha angle (ICC, 0.43), Tönnis osteoarthritis classification (κ = 0.22), and classification of pelvic tilt (using the coccyx or sacrococcygeal joint) (κ = 0.43 and 0.61, respectively).
CONCLUSION: A computer-assisted analysis of young adult hip radiographs generally demonstrates substantial to excellent levels of interobserver reliability for most parameters. However, alpha angle measurements demonstrated only moderate interobserver reliability, despite excellent intraobserver reliability. Measurements of the joint space width appear to be significantly more reliable than the use of the Tönnis osteoarthritis classification in this population. The classification of pelvic tilt utilizing the coccyx or sacrococcygeal joint is only moderately reliable.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  dysplasia; femoroacetabular impingement; hip; radiographic analysis; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25134816     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514542797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  28 in total

1.  Modified head-neck offset for diagnosing anterior femoro-acetabular impingement.

Authors:  Aloїs Espié; Fanny Elia; Jérôme Murgier; Philippe Chiron; Benoit Chaput
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Does Compensatory Anterior Pelvic Tilt Decrease After Bilateral Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Authors:  Erika Daley; Nickolas Nahm; Denise Koueiter; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Classifications in Brief: Tönnis Classification of Hip Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Boris Kovalenko; Prashoban Bremjit; Navin Fernando
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Patient-Reported Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy from the Prospective ANCHOR Cohort Study.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; Jeffrey Ackerman; Geneva Baca; Jack Baty; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; David A Podeszwa; Perry L Schoenecker; Rafael J Sierra; Ernest L Sink; Daniel J Sucato; Robert T Trousdale; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  The borderline dysplastic hip: when and how is it abnormal?

Authors:  Sarah D Bixby; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04

6.  Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; YoungJae Shin; Praful Agrawal; Shireen Y Elhabian; Ross T Whitaker; Jeffrey A Weiss; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The Pattern of Acetabular Cartilage Wear Is Hip Morphology-dependent and Patient Demographic-dependent.

Authors:  Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; Deborah J Li; George Grammatopoulos; Elizabeth L Yanik; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?

Authors:  Michael P McClincy; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Rapidly Progressive Arthritis in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Patient Characteristics and Risk Factors for Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Age of Forty.

Authors:  Kevin A Schafer; John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

10.  Relationship between crossover sign and anterior center-edge angle.

Authors:  Robert A Christian; Michael H McCarthy; Bennet A Butler; Ekamjeet S Dhillon; Michael A Terry; Vehniah K Tjong
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.